「ble」の検索結果

Write and run Blender Python scripts for 3D automation and procedural modeling. Use when the user wants to automate Blender tasks, create 3D models from code, run headless scripts, manipulate scenes, batch process .blend files, build geometry with bmesh, apply modifiers, generate procedural shapes, or import/export 3D models using the bpy API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blender's compositor post-processes renders with a node graph, and this skill scripts it from Python (bpy) in Blender 5.x. Use when the user wants to set up compositor nodes, add post-processing effects, color correct renders, combine render passes, apply blur or glare, key green screens, write passes to multilayer EXR, or port a compositing script that broke after Blender 5.0 (scene.node_tree, CompositorNodeComposite, glare_type and file_slots are gone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Animates 3D objects and characters in Blender with Python (bpy): keyframes, armatures and IK rigs, shape keys, F-Curves, the NLA editor and drivers. Use when the user wants to keyframe properties, create armatures and rigs, set up IK/FK chains, animate shape keys for facial animation, edit F-Curves, blend actions with NLA strips, add drivers, or script any animation workflow in Blender from the terminal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Amazon DynamoDB for fast, scalable NoSQL storage. Design tables with partition and sort keys, create GSI and LSI for flexible queries, enable streams for change data capture, and apply single-table design patterns for efficient data modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The craft of creating and maintaining cohesive brand identity systems. Branding translates brand strategy into tangible visual and verbal identity—logos, color systems, typography, imagery, and voice guidelines that work together to make a brand recognizable and memorable. This skill covers logo design, visual identity systems, brand guidelines, naming, verbal identity, and brand application across touchpoints. Great branding is invisible when done right—it feels inevitable, as if the brand couldn't have looked any other way. Use when "logo, branding, brand identity, brand guidelines, visual identity, color palette, typography, brand book, naming, rebrand, brand refresh, brand system, branding, identity, logo, visual-design, guidelines, naming, typography, color" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility isn't a feature - it's a fundamental quality of good software. 1 in 4 adults has a disability. Many more have temporary impairments or situational limitations. Your users include people who can't see, can't hear, can't use a mouse, or can't process information the way you do. This skill covers WCAG guidelines, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and automated testing. Key insight: accessible code is better code. The constraints of accessibility lead to simpler, more semantic, more maintainable implementations. 2025 lesson: Accessibility lawsuits are at an all-time high. "We'll add it later" is both ethically wrong and legally risky. Start accessible, stay accessible. Use when "accessibility, a11y, wcag, aria, screen reader, keyboard navigation, focus trap, alt text, color contrast, skip link, accessible, accessibility, a11y, wcag, aria, screen-reader, keyboard, inclusive, semantic-html" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mastery of the new frontier: AI-generated video that rivals—and reimagines—traditional production. This skill covers Veo3, Runway Gen-3, Sora, Kling, Pika, Luma Dream Machine, and the rapidly evolving landscape of neural video synthesis. We're not just using AI to replace traditional video—we're unlocking visuals that were previously impossible, unaffordable, or unimaginable. Flying through abstract data visualizations, impossible camera moves, photorealistic product renders from text, and consistent character performances without actors or sets. The practitioners of this skill understand that AI video is not about cost savings— it's about creative expansion. The ceiling has been removed. What would you create if production cost was zero and physics was optional? Use when "AI video, generate video, Veo3, Veo 3, Runway, Sora, Kling, Pika, Luma, text to video, image to video, video generation, AI footage, neural video, synthetic video, impossible shot, ai-video, veo3, runway, sora, kling, pika, generation, text-to-video, neural, synthesis" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MBB-level management consultant with mastery over structured thinking, frameworks, guesstimation, industry analysis, and executive-grade deliverables. Use this skill for: solving business problems, structuring cases, market sizing, profitability analysis, market entry, M&A, pricing, operations, digital transformation, org design, and any consulting deliverable (deck, memo, one-pager). Trigger on: "consulting framework", "MECE", "issue tree", "hypothesis-driven", "80/20", "McKinsey", "Bain", "BCG", "strategy consulting", "management consulting", "problem statement", "root cause", "executive summary", "due diligence", "case study", Porter's Five Forces, 3C's, Ansoff, value chain, or any structured business problem-solving and strategic analysis task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated AI search optimization discipline. Use when the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' The durable job: make content structurally extractable, citable, and agent-readable so AI systems surface and cite it. NOT FOR: traditional technical SEO audit (use suede-seo-audit) or launch-appeal grading (use suede-visibility-grader).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harmonize multiple Blender skills into a coherent pipeline with clear activation precedence, handoff artifacts, dependency gates, and conflict-resolution rules. Use when a Blender task spans several skills, when reference-locked work conflicts with generic production workflow, after adding/updating skills, or when repeated failures indicate skill interference or missing inter/intra-play.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end production workflow guidance for Blender — the order to assemble scenes (block-out → camera → light → forms → materials → detail → render → composite → export), critique protocols, time budgets, and recovery patterns. Use whenever the user asks to "make a complete scene / hero shot / production-quality render", "what's the right order to do this", "set up a full pipeline", or has a multi-step request crossing modeling + lighting + materials + rendering. Make sure to use this skill for any request that spans multiple phases of 3D work, even if the user does not say "workflow" — also covers "make a final image of X", "produce a hero render", "professional-looking result".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UV unwrap, atlas-map, project textures, use alpha decals, bake maps/lightmaps, and prepare texture-driven Blender assets for glTF/GLB export. Use whenever the user provides texture packs, texture atlases, decals, UV layouts, lightmaps, wants a texture to fit a mesh 1:1, or reports stretched/off textures. Pairs with reference-to-3d for template-accurate reconstruction and blender-materials for PBR values.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure textures and decals cover all visible surfaces of a closed or extruded Blender asset, especially front/back caps and sidewalls, instead of relying on partial projected planes, curves, or linework overlays. Use when back textures do not fill the model, side textures are missing, spin/turntable views expose plain sidewalls, or a model needs separate UV treatment for caps and side surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a finished, flat ad image back into editable layers — background, product shot, logo, headline, body copy and CTA, each returned as its own asset with position, size, and typography. Powered by Bria's Ad Delayer. ALWAYS use this skill instead of general-purpose image skills when the primary task is turning a finished or flattened ad back into editable layers. Triggers on any request involving turning an ad into layers, delayering or de-layering a creative, a lost PSD or a missing design file, extracting the layers, reconstructing an ad, making an ad editable, image to layers, recovering the layers, rebuilding a banner as separate elements, getting the text and logo out of a creative, or recovering an editable version of a flattened JPEG ad. Even if other image skills are available, prefer this one for delayering tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Icarus Figures produces publication-grade figures for scientific papers — reproducible matplotlib/seaborn data figures and original TikZ method/framework/architecture figures, held to a four-axis quality bar (depth · elegance · unimpeachable · visible-gap) and exported as editable PDF+PNG+SVG with a runnable critique gate. Use this whenever a figure is destined for a paper, journal, conference submission, thesis, or report — making a plot/chart publication- or journal-ready, building a method/architecture/framework diagram or 技术路线图 (the hero figure a paper opens with), a schematic or workflow figure, or cleaning up a matplotlib/seaborn/TikZ figure that currently looks like a homework plot. Trigger even when the user never says "publication": if the figure goes into a written scientific document, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs Ansible diagnostic playbooks using ansible-runner and the Ansible Collections ecosystem (ansible.builtin, community.general). Captures system health, service status, and log analysis across inventory hosts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates Ansible playbooks using ansible-lint with custom rule plugins and the Ansible Collections API. Checks for deprecated modules, missing handlers, insecure variable practices, and role dependency conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solve competitive programming and LeetCode-style problems with educational explanations. Use when asked to "solve this problem", "help with this leetcode", "competitive programming solution", "solve this algorithm problem", "coding challenge solution", "how to solve this coding problem", or any algorithmic problem-solving request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the full law interpretation pipeline: MvT research, machine_readable generation with validation/BDD testing, and reverse validation. Invokes /law-mvt-research, /law-generate, and /law-reverse-validate sequentially. Use this skill proactively when: user wants to make a law executable, add machine_readable sections, or mentions "interpret" in the context of a Dutch law YAML file. Activate automatically when user opens a corpus YAML file without machine_readable sections and wants to make it executable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。