「bli」の検索結果

Assesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commission's draft Art. 50 Guidelines. Covers AI-chatbot disclosure, deepfake and synthetic-content marking/watermarking, emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation notices, the machine-readable marking duty, the obviousness exceptions, and the implementation timeline. Outputs a formal mini-report plus a per-obligation compliance checklist with gap flags. For breadth-first tier triage use the EU AI Act System Classifier; for raw Art. 50 text and Q&A use the EU AI Act Knowledge Base; for the full role x tier matrix use the EU AI Act Obligations Mapper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include "Data Act", "Datengesetz", "Regulation (EU) 2023/2854", "Art. 4(1) request", "Art. 5(1) third-party request", "trade-secret handbrake", "cloud switching obligations", "Chapter VI", "Ch V exceptional need", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights, Significant Data Fiduciary, Data Protection Board of India, consent under DPDPA, notice requirements, breach notification India, children's data India, cross-border data transfer India, India privacy compliance, DPDPA gap analysis, DPDPA vs GDPR, or any obligation under India's personal data protection framework. Also trigger for: "Section 6 consent", "Section 7 legitimate uses", "Section 9 children's data", "Section 10 SDF", "Section 16 cross-border", "Rule 6 breach notification", "Rule 13 SDF obligations", "Data Protection Board complaint", "verifiable parental consent India", "DPDPA compliance roadmap", or "India privacy law global company".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA cross-referencing under the amended Article 27(4), the unconditional notification duty under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use *before* starting work in a domain you don't know well, to surface the "unknown unknowns" — the things you don't even know to ask about — and learn just enough to prompt and decide well. Implements the "blind spot pass" pattern from Anthropic's Fable "finding your unknowns" field guide. Triggers when you say "I'm new to this", "I don't know what to ask", "teach me before we start", "blind spot pass", "unknown unknowns", "find my unknowns", or the Korean "내가 뭘 모르는지 알려줘" / "이 분야 처음인데" / "먼저 가르쳐줘" / "블라인드 스팟", or when you hand off a task while admitting you're a non-expert in that field (color grading, video editing, legal, tax, finance, design, an unfamiliar codebase, etc.). Do NOT use for simple factual questions, domains you already know, or directly-actionable work — answer those directly or route to planner / architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides whether a company publishes public self-serve pricing and extracts its plan tiers, price points and feature axis. Triggers on "do they have a pricing page", "is their pricing public", "filter out enterprise quote-only companies", "what do they charge", "find their plans", "self-serve vs sales-led". Outputs a structured pricing record per domain. The copy-ready pricing clause is OFF by default and runs only when a campaign brief asks for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

META skill — build the largest possible qualified lead list for any request, end to end. Orchestrates discovery (Prospeo + GetLeads + Blitz + Google Maps + lookalike snowball from /list-expander), AI qualification with live-website verify, uncapped contact pull (GetLeads → Blitz → Prospeo), and provider emails (GetLeads/Blitz/Prospeo) validated with MillionVerifier before sending. Use for any "build me a list", "get me leads for X", "find everyone who...", client list request, or campaign list build. Starts with a 7-line intake brief; outputs to Postgres, Google Sheet, and/or CSV (asks which).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a generated harness to npm — runs the smoke test, signs the witness manifest, and dispatches `npm publish --provenance` from your tagged release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekdays, light browser lane. The one routine in this kit with an outward surface. Takes the slots that are due today, whose drafts were written yesterday and passed the copy check, whose hold box is not ticked, and whose destination the member wrote into the publish allow list themselves, and hands each one to the channel the member configured. It records a receipt the instant each slot lands. It never drives a browser control to publish, never replies, sends only where you released the channel a message, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs once by hand on the first day and once a month after that. On the first run it researches the business from its own public surfaces, reads the member's own already published posts, and builds the voice file from real samples rather than from an idea of a voice, then writes the plan, creates the proof inventory, seeds the opening slots, and registers the recurring jobs. On every monthly run it re reads the evidence the kit produced and rebuilds only what the evidence contradicts. It publishes only where you released the channel, never replies, spends only where you released it, and it never enters a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely refactors C#/.NET code without changing behavior. USE FOR any request to refactor, rename, move, extract, inline, merge, consolidate, deduplicate, split, or modernize C# code, including partial/generated declarations, wrappers, public APIs, serialization/reflection/configuration names, friend assemblies, conditional compilation, and multi-targeted projects. Also use when a request calls a feature, bug fix, package/framework upgrade, or public nullability change a refactor and the behavior-changing part must be separated or declined. DO NOT USE FOR ordinary feature or bug fixes not presented as refactoring; standalone upgrades after reclassification (use dotnet-upgrade); adding tests; or formatting-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather and correlate open source intelligence from public sources for authorized investigations, threat intelligence, and attack surface assessment. Use when the user mentions 'OSINT,' 'open source intelligence,' 'digital footprint,' 'public records,' 'threat intelligence,' 'investigate a domain,' or needs to research a target using publicly available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing Spring application events. Validates event publishing with ApplicationEventPublisher, tests @EventListener annotation behavior, and verifies async event handling. Use when writing tests for event listeners, mocking application events, or verifying events were published in your Spring Boot services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

只读检索小红书公开内容，并把账号数据、标题、封面、互动量、作者近期内容和低粉爆款整理成可追溯证据。用户要求查公开账号或笔记数据时使用；不得点赞、收藏、评论、发布、删除或导出登录凭证。 English: Read-only research for public Xiaohongshu content, collecting traceable evidence such as account data, titles, covers, engagement, recent posts, and low-follower breakout examples. Use for public account or post research; never like, save, comment, publish, delete, or export credentials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix wildcard subdomain routing for Fastly Compute@Edge services when subdomains resolve but return 500 "Domain Not Found" or empty responses. Use when: (1) TLS subscription "issued" but edge serves default certificate (CN=j.sni-644-default), (2) Fastly domain-v1 create succeeds but subdomain returns 500, (3) Static publisher/PublisherServer returns empty content for subdomain requests, (4) DNS wildcard CNAME resolves to wrong target. Covers TLS configuration SNI endpoint selection (x.sni vs j.sni vs w.sni), DNS trailing dot issues, Fastly domain-v1 activation, and reading from KV store directly when PublisherServer fails for subdomains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

一键发布 agent skill 到 GitHub，自动验证 SKILL.md、生成或检查更吸引人的 README、区分 skill name 与 GitHub repo name、创建或更新仓库、推送并通过 npx skills 真实安装验证。当用户说"发布这个skill"、"publish skill"、"把skill发到GitHub"、"分享这个skill"、"/publish-skill"时触发。支持发布当前目录或指定路径的 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources with Firecrawl Research, using semantic paper search, related-paper expansion, and in-body verification over Firecrawl's paper index — largely biomedical and life-science literature from PubMed, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, plus arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math. Use when the user wants a literature review, systematic review, survey of studies, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from scholarly and industry publications, including clinical, drug, gene, disease, epidemiology, and public-health topics. Prefer this over a general web-research workflow whenever the evidence base is published papers rather than web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Release moi-computer to npm — verify locally, hand off to the gated GitHub Actions workflow, then verify the published package. Defaults to a `next` preview; pass `stable` for a `latest` release. Use when the user asks to publish, release, ship a version, or cut a dev preview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。