「boundary」の検索結果

Cross-cutting standards for error design, response shapes, error codes, and boundary placement across API, domain, and infrastructure layers. Use when defining error hierarchies, wrapping exceptions, building standardized error responses, or placing error boundaries in layered architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage editing boundary restrictions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or refresh a STRIDE-based threat model for the current repository using Bug Hunter-native artifacts. Use whenever the repository has no threat model yet, the architecture changed materially, a security review needs fresh trust-boundary context, or the user explicitly asks for a threat model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correctly call native (C/C++) libraries from .NET using P/Invoke and LibraryImport. Covers function signatures, string marshalling, memory lifetime, SafeHandle, and cross-platform patterns. USE FOR: writing new P/Invoke or LibraryImport declarations, reviewing or debugging existing native interop code, wrapping a C or C++ library for use in .NET, diagnosing crashes, memory leaks, or corruption at the managed/native boundary. DO NOT USE FOR: COM interop, C++/CLI mixed-mode assemblies, or pure managed code with no native dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or review .NET solution architecture across modular monoliths, clean architecture, vertical slices, microservices, DDD, CQRS, and cloud-native boundaries without over-engineering. USE FOR: .NET architecture choices; layer and domain boundary review; service decomposition; clean architecture, vertical slice, DDD, CQRS, and modular monolith decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that process personal data and need GDPR-aware engineering controls. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java service for GDPR privacy controls; Design data-subject rights workflows; Add retention, deletion, pseudonymization, or privacy-safe logging; Assess data transfer, DPIA, breach evidence, or processor/controller boundary concerns before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Spring Boot — including HTTP methods, resource URIs, status codes, DTOs, versioning, deprecation and sunset headers, content negotiation (JSON and vendor media types), ISO-8601 instants in DTOs, pagination/sorting/filtering, Bean Validation at the boundary, idempotency, ETag concurrency, HTTP caching, error handling, security, contract-first OpenAPI (OpenAPI Generator), controller advice, and problem details for errors. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring Boot REST API; Apply best practices for Spring Boot REST API in Java code; Design Spring Boot REST controllers and DTOs; Add Problem Details error responses in Spring Boot REST; Improve pagination validation or idempotency in Spring APIs. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or write Java unit tests — including migrating from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5, adopting AssertJ for fluent assertions, structuring tests with Given-When-Then, ensuring test independence, applying parameterized tests, mocking dependencies with Mockito, verifying boundary conditions (RIGHT-BICEP, CORRECT, A-TRIP), leveraging JSpecify null-safety annotations, or eliminating testing anti-patterns such as reflection-based tests or shared mutable state. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for unit tests; Apply best practices for unit tests in Java code; Write fast JUnit unit tests for Java code; Improve Mockito-based Java unit tests; Refactor Java tests to isolate collaborators. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to apply functional programming principles in Java — including writing immutable objects and Records, pure functions, functional interfaces, lambda expressions, Stream API pipelines, Optional for null safety, function composition, higher-order functions, pattern matching for instanceof and switch, sealed classes/interfaces for controlled hierarchies, Stream Gatherers for custom operations, currying/partial application, effect boundary separation, and concurrent-safe functional patterns. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Functional Programming; Apply Functional Programming; Refactor the code with Functional Programming; Refactor Java code to use streams or Optionals safely; Improve immutability and pure functions in Java. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit applications for AI prompt injection, agent security, and LLM permission boundary vulnerabilities. Use when the user mentions 'prompt injection,' 'LLM security,' 'AI security,' 'jailbreak,' 'indirect prompt injection,' 'prompt leaking,' 'AI red team,' 'LLM vulnerabilities,' 'AI input validation,' 'system prompt extraction,' 'agent security,' 'MCP security,' 'AI permissions,' 'AI privilege escalation,' or needs to secure any application with AI features, AI agents, or LLM integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when crossing a Windows security boundary or escaping a sandbox — kernel/user crossing (win32k/dxgkrnl UAF CVE-2025-24983), BYOVD kernel R/W, UAC/COM elevation, AppContainer/LPAC & Chromium-Mojo sandbox escape (CVE-2025-2783), PPL bypass, RPC/ALPC & named-pipe impersonation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement smooth, accessible animations with motion/react (Framer Motion) in React. Use when adding animations, gestures, or layout transitions with motion, AnimatePresence, useScroll, and related APIs. Requires a 'use client' boundary; not for strictly server-rendered components or when no animation is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or audit Next.js 16 App Router apps using a next-beats-style React Server Components architecture. Use when scaffolding a new app, adding a feature, reviewing an existing app, refactoring route-loader-shaped pages into feature-owned async server components, deciding where queries/actions/components live, keeping pages synchronous with `params.then()`, placing Suspense boundaries, choosing the client/server boundary, designing skeletons, preventing CLS, or following Cache Components Instant Navigation. Also use when the user asks about RSC composition, components receiving IDs instead of route params, `'use cache'`, `cacheTag`, `updateTag`, static-shell prerendering, or making an app easier for AI agents to modify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then guards against regression. Use when asked to make a route's navigation instant (its static shell commits immediately), fix a route whose static shell isn't prerendered/served/prefetched, grow a route's static shell or fix its slow first paint, diagnose which Suspense boundary keeps a route out of its static shell, or write the instant() e2e guard for one. Requires Next.js 16.3+ with cacheComponents; directs an upgrade if older.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for testing utility classes, static methods, and helper functions. Validates pure functions, null handling, edge cases, and boundary conditions. Generates AssertJ assertions and @ParameterizedTest for string utils, math utils, validators, and collection helpers. Use when testing utils, test helpers, helper functions, static methods, or verifying utility code correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides parameterized testing patterns with JUnit 5, generates data-driven unit tests using @ParameterizedTest, @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource. Creates tests that run the same logic with multiple input values. Use when writing data-driven Java tests, multiple test cases from single method, or boundary value analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides chunking strategies for RAG systems. Generates chunk size recommendations (256-1024 tokens), overlap percentages (10-20%), and semantic boundary detection methods. Validates semantic coherence and evaluates retrieval precision/recall metrics. Use when building retrieval-augmented generation systems, vector databases, or processing large documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create error boundaries, error handling, and fallback UIs for React applications. Use when implementing error handling, creating fallback components, or setting up error reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct and report long-running or multi-turn research, architecture questions, reviews, decisions, completion results, and status as a clear, self-contained brief. Use when a reader must re-enter earlier context, understand the real question and its relationships, distinguish verified facts from judgment and open evidence, or make a decision without reconstructing the work log. Quote the relevant original user wording before substantive analysis, keep one coherent main line, use spatial diagrams when relationships matter, and finish with an explicit decision boundary and practical next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 不可见边界验真｜碰撞、手测与改道离开 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive test scenarios from requirements including BDD/Gherkin scenarios, unit tests, integration tests, and end-to-end test cases. Use when converting requirements, user stories, or specifications into testable scenarios with full coverage including happy paths, error cases, edge cases, and boundary conditions. Outputs structured test suites ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect semantic-level bugs by analyzing whether code behavior matches its intended purpose inferred from function/variable names, comments, docstrings, and documentation. Use when users need to: (1) Find logic errors where implementation contradicts stated intent, (2) Identify off-by-one errors and boundary mismatches, (3) Detect inverted logic or wrong operators, (4) Catch missing edge case handling, (5) Verify code matches its documentation. Highlights mismatches between intent and implementation across multiple programming languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate targeted test inputs to reach specific code paths and hard-to-reach behaviors in Python code. Use when: (1) Targeting uncovered branches or specific execution paths, (2) Need coverage-guided test generation, (3) Want to leverage LLM understanding of code semantics for meaningful test inputs, (4) Testing boundary conditions and edge cases systematically, (5) Combining symbolic reasoning with fuzzing. Provides path analysis, constraint solving, coverage-guided strategies, and LLM-driven semantic generation for comprehensive test input creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。