「code quality」の検索結果

Verify code correctness statically against specifications using type checking, contract verification, and formal methods. Use when: (1) Verifying type safety and null safety in Python, Java, or C/C++ code, (2) Checking design-by-contract specifications (preconditions, postconditions, invariants), (3) Validating code against formal specifications, (4) Ensuring code quality and correctness before runtime, (5) Finding potential bugs through static analysis. Supports Python (mypy, contracts), Java (javac, JML), and provides verification scripts and contract specification guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality in WooCommerce projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ESLint is the standard linting tool for JavaScript and TypeScript projects. It statically analyzes your code to find problems, enforce coding conventions, and catch bugs before they reach production. ESLint 9 introduced the flat config format, replacing the legacy `.eslintrc` system with a simpler, more composable `eslint.config.js` file. With a rich plugin ecosystem covering React, TypeScript, accessibility, and import ordering, ESLint is the backbone of code quality in modern web development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing a codebase, or refactoring. Covers TypeScript, Node.js, infrastructure-as-code, and full-stack web apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review knowledge base: quality, security (OWASP Top 10), error-handling, performance, and test-coverage checklists with severity-ranked output format. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or before commits. Loaded automatically by the code-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when the task involves `apply best practices`, `security audit`, `modernize code`, `code quality review`, or `check for vulnerabilities`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring patterns and techniques for improving code quality without changing behavior. Use for cleaning up legacy code, reducing complexity, or improving maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop AI agents from secretly bypassing your rules. Mechanical enforcement with git hooks, secret detection, deployment verification, and import registries. Born from real production incidents: server crashes, token leaks, code rewrites. Works with Claude Code, Clawdbot, Cursor. Install once, enforce forever.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lint source code for potential code quality problems. Use when the user wants to "lint" or "check" source code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to analyze a file, a directory, or the whole codebase to understand structure, architecture, dependencies, complexity, duplication, dead code, or technical debt — e.g. "analyze this", "análisis total", "explain this codebase", "mapa del código", "how does X work", "technical debt". Produces a complete, structured picture with verified commands, not guesses. Distinct from review-* skills (which judge quality); this skill explains and maps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

设计代码规范 / Lint 配置 / Code Review 标准时使用。覆盖 SOLID 原则 / Lint 工具（ESLint / Prettier / Checkstyle / pylint / golangci-lint）/ SonarQube 集成。融合 Clean Code + Robert Martin SOLID + Code Review 文化。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a rigorous Carmack Council code review. Use when explicitly asked to review code, do a "council review", "carmack review", or invoke /council-review. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipelines), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality), Kent Beck (test quality). Uses parallel subagents for deep, independent review. Produces prioritised P1/P2/P3 findings. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or maintain the full tdmcp repo quality-audit team: command sweeps, all package/Makefile/CI gates, security review, usability/flow review, refactor/test-gap analysis, coverage hardening, QA, and follow-up fix waves. Use whenever the user asks for a complete audit, improve repo/code quality, test all commands, find security/usability failures, refactor debt, add missing tests, re-run the audit, continue a previous quality wave, or verify the repo is ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when the task involves `apply best practices`, `security audit`, `modernize code`, `code quality review`, or `check for vulnerabilities`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing the imp codebase for structural debt, dead code, god-objects/files, duplication, flag sprawl, or deciding whether a cleanup is worth shipping - "structure audit", "tech debt", "is this still used", "dead code", "refactor for clarity", "should we split this file", "remove this flag", "file size gate red", "alloc sites gate red". Do NOT use for build/test mechanics (building-and-testing), perf/kernel work (benchmark-cuda / sm120-cuda-expert), or output quality (check-degeneration).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, `.editorconfig`, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. Use when a .NET repo needs an explicit quality stack in `AGENTS.md`, docs, or pipeline YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-agent cleanup pattern. Implementer works freely, then a dedicated cleanup agent removes unused imports, console.logs, commented-out code, dead code, and formatting issues. Produces a diff of what was cleaned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality expert including clean code, style guides, and refactoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, bugs, and improvements. Use when user wants code review or quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, `.editorconfig`, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. Use when a .NET repo needs an explicit quality stack in `AGENTS.md`, docs, or pipeline YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript and JavaScript performance and code-quality rules, usable in any framework. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring hot paths, data-structure choices, async flows, or bundle-size-sensitive code. Triggers include "optimize this function", "too slow", "reduce allocations", "bundle size", "lazy load", "speed up imports", or general code review of utilities and services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。