Manage AI costs with usage tracking and optimization. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-cost-management related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,669 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Manage AI costs with usage tracking and optimization. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-cost-management related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement activity-based costing systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with activity-based-costing related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Why expensive, wasteful, effortful, or self-deprecating actions build trust and desire — Rory Sutherland on signalling. Use when the problem is credibility or desirability rather than meaning: the user asks 'why don't people trust us', 'how do we look more credible/committed/premium', 'is our guarantee/warranty worth it', 'should we spend on brand advertising', 'how do we justify a higher price', or wonders why a cheaper-looking competitor wins. Covers costly signals (advertising spend, guarantees, over-delivery), price-as-quality-signal (Veblen goods), and the Pratfall Effect (admitting a real flaw to gain trust). Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談(「信頼されない」「安心してもらえない」「強気な価格で売りたい」「広告費に意味はある?」)にも使う。中文咨询(“不被信任”“想以高价出售”“广告费有意义吗?”)也适用。
Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a carrier asks how to calculate cost-per-mile (CPM) at the fleet, truck, lane, or driver level — separating fixed vs variable costs, allocating overhead, accounting for empty miles, and using CPM to negotiate rates, build pricing tiers, or evaluate lane profitability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetches real-time Azure retail pricing using the Azure Retail Prices API (prices.azure.com) and estimates Copilot Studio agent credit consumption. Use when the user asks about the cost of any Azure service, wants to compare SKU prices, needs pricing data for a cost estimate, mentions Azure pricing, Azure costs, Azure billing, or asks about Copilot Studio pricing, Copilot Credits, or agent usage estimation. Covers compute, storage, networking, databases, AI, Copilot Studio, and all other Azure service families.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a cloud cost optimization expert specializing in reducing infrastructure expenses while maintaining performance and reliability. Analyze cloud spending, identify savings opportunities, and implement cost-effective architectures across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
look up and explain llm api pricing across models.dev, openrouter, and official provider pages. use when the user asks for model prices, input/output token costs, cached-token costs, openrouter aliases such as :free, provider-specific pricing, official versus third-party prices, or wants to verify an api call cost log.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and audit a pricing function for variable-cost agent labor. Choose among per-seat, metered, credits, hybrid, and outcome pricing; name buyer value and cost metrics separately; calculate a reproducible cost floor; require pre-commitment guardrails; and stress-test declared personas. Use for offline pricing-design evidence, not billing implementation or runtime control. NOT for production billing, payment collection, or runtime spend enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ローカルにある複数のAI開発エージェントのログを集計し、トークン数やAPI換算費用をSVGカードにします。READMEや資料に載せる利用状況をまとめられます。
請求書やフォームなどの規則的なテキストから情報を取り出す処理を、正規表現とLLMで設計し、抽出結果の信頼度が低い項目だけを確認・修正する流れを示します。
配送の遅延・破損・紛失・数量不足に対し、証拠収集から補償請求、運送会社との交渉までを整理し、損失額や顧客への影響に応じた対応判断を支えるスキル。
AIエージェントが使うツールの種類や入出力、エラーからの復帰手順を設計・見直します。文脈の情報量も整理し、作業完了率や再試行回数で改善を評価します。
Act on a Caveman learn report - review the ranked token sinks, apply cost-lowering fixes with per-edit consent, and report what those fixes returned. Use when asked to lower an agent's token cost, what caveman has saved, to trim a heavy CLAUDE.md, or to offload re-pasted context into cavemem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
View cost breakdowns, token usage, and call logs from the CLI. Filter by provider, model, or date range. Export usage reports and inspect per-connection spending.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-capture per-session token usage from the Claude Code session jsonl and persist to the cost-tracking namespace
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read every docs/benchmarks/runs/*.json and surface drift in win rate, latency, escalation rate, and LLM-baseline cost over time
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenRouter real spend — key limit and usage today/week/month, one request's billed cost by generation id, account credits. Use when asked what OpenRouter charged or whether a key is near its limit. Network and API key: asks first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-baseline counterfactual cost analysis. Compares actual session spend to hypothetical always-haiku / always-sonnet / always-opus routing baselines. Answers "is the routing earning its keep?" Negative savings flag over-escalation; positive savings quantify the router's win.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read accumulated cost-tracking spend + budget config, compute utilization, emit 50/75/90/100% alert ladder
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。