「critique」の検索結果

Apply this skill whenever evaluating neurodegenerative disease research, protein misfolding, experimental rigor, or career longevity for women in STEM. Use this to channel the thinking of Virginia M.-Y. Lee, neuroscientist at the University of Pennsylvania known for her pioneering work on neurodegeneration. Trigger this skill when discussing Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS, protein aggregation, cell-to-cell transmission of pathology, brain banking, or multidisciplinary scientific collaboration. It is highly relevant when users need critiques on biological models, advice on sustaining a long scientific career, or frameworks for translating clinical pathology into basic science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the rigorous deontological ethics, transcendental idealism, and political philosophy of Immanuel Kant (18th-century German philosopher, Critique of Pure Reason). Reach for this skill whenever the user is facing moral dilemmas, questions of duty, truth-telling, evaluating the limits of human knowledge, balancing civic obedience with free speech, or designing systems for global governance and peace. Use this skill to evaluate actions based on universalizability and human dignity rather than consequences, even if the user doesn't explicitly name Kant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the reasoning of Hannah Arendt, 20th-century political theorist and author of 'The Origins of Totalitarianism'. Use this skill whenever you are evaluating moral responsibility, analyzing systemic evil, distinguishing between power and violence, or assessing the nature of political action and freedom. Trigger it when discussing bureaucracy, thoughtlessness, the public vs. private realm, truth in politics, or when a user faces unprecedented moral dilemmas requiring 'thinking without a banister'. Apply her frameworks to critique historical determinism, defend factual truth, and analyze human plurality, even if the user does not explicitly name her.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to apply the rigorous epidemiological reasoning of Julie E. Buring (epidemiologist and women's health trialist) to study design, clinical trial critiques, cardiovascular risk assessment, and evidence-based integrative medicine. Trigger this skill whenever you are evaluating medical literature, designing cohort studies or RCTs, assessing conflicting research findings, or analyzing cardiovascular risk factors (especially in women). Reach for this when users ask about the validity of supplements, the discrepancy between observational and randomized data, or how to future-proof a clinical registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the moral philosophy and literary frameworks of Iris Murdoch (British moral philosopher and novelist). Use this skill whenever you are helping a user navigate ethical dilemmas, interpersonal conflicts, creative writing, literary critique, or the struggle against ego and selfishness. Trigger this skill for topics involving moral psychology, the nature of love, attention, objective morality, the separation of philosophy and literature, or overcoming personal fantasy. Murdoch's approach is essential when users are stuck in self-centered thinking, trying to force a decision through sheer willpower, or struggling to see the reality of other people clearly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers design systems, anti-pattern detection, brand vs product registers, typography, color (OKLCH), spacing, motion, copy, and accessibility. By Paul Bakaus (ex-Google, ex-Disney, ex-Unity). Full version includes 23 sub-commands, CLI detection, Chrome extension, and E2E test suite: npx skills add pbakaus/impeccable

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberating decisions and founder priorities through multi-perspective, named-expert, and YC-style advisory lenses. Use for verdicts, office hours, or expert critique; not implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Store a memory in AgentDB — an episode (task + outcome + critique), a pattern, or a skill. Use when the user says "remember this", "save this for later", "add to memory", or when the agent has just succeeded/failed at a task and the lesson is worth keeping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end production workflow guidance for Blender — the order to assemble scenes (block-out → camera → light → forms → materials → detail → render → composite → export), critique protocols, time budgets, and recovery patterns. Use whenever the user asks to "make a complete scene / hero shot / production-quality render", "what's the right order to do this", "set up a full pipeline", or has a multi-step request crossing modeling + lighting + materials + rendering. Make sure to use this skill for any request that spans multiple phases of 3D work, even if the user does not say "workflow" — also covers "make a final image of X", "produce a hero render", "professional-looking result".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, critique, and refine academic posters from a paper, LaTeX project, reference draft image, HTML/CSS source, PPT/PDF outputs, or local figure assets. Use when Codex is asked to create or improve a research poster, convert a poster design to HTML/PDF/PPTX, fix poster layout/typography/overflow/blank-space issues, or preserve paper figures and result semantics in a poster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, critique, and iterate image-generation prompts for high-fidelity academic paper poster reference mockups before implementing HTML/PDF/PPTX. Use when Codex is asked to create a poster concept image, imagegen prompt, visual reference draft, layout mockup, or "生图" design for ACL/EMNLP/NeurIPS-style A0 posters from a paper, figures, metrics, logos, QR codes, or an existing poster screenshot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redesign Stacktape's marketing website or Console through visual exploration, independent design critique, and browser verification. Use for substantial page, flow, or visual-system design work, including agent-led redesigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Usability review — evaluate an existing flow or UI against usability heuristics, flag friction points, and recommend fixes. Use when asked to "review the UX", "usability audit", "what's wrong with this flow", "UX feedback", "critique this design", or "why are users dropping off here".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads and analyzes academic papers (arXiv preprints, conference / journal PDFs, Zotero items) at three configurable depths: quick skim (2 min), standard read (10 min), or deep analysis (30 min). Produces structured digests covering problem, method, key innovation, results, limitations, reproducibility, hidden assumptions, and connections to the user's other work. Use when the user shares an arXiv link, PDF, or paper title and asks to read / summarize / digest / TL;DR / analyze / review / critique / explain / break down a paper, asks about a paper's contributions / methods / results / equations / figures, wants to compare two papers side by side, or needs a reading note for their records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite frontend design taste for building, reviewing, and polishing web interfaces. Use whenever the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, or improve any UI (landing pages, portfolios, dashboards, product UI, components, forms, onboarding, empty states) or asks to make something look better / premium / modern, fix the styling, add or fix animations, or make a design feel less generic ("AI slop"). Covers typography, color, spacing, layout, visual hierarchy, motion, micro-interactions, component states, accessibility, responsive behavior, UX copy, and anti-pattern detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mindset theory, implicit theories of intelligence, and motivation research applied to learning. Covers fixed vs. growth mindset, the difference between process praise and ability praise, the "not yet" intervention, attribution patterns after failure, mindset critiques and the replication record, and the integration of mindset work with self-determination theory (autonomy, competence, relatedness). Use when a learner is stuck on motivation, disengaging after failure, or when a curriculum's feedback language is undermining persistence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to forge, scaffold, author, or ship a new skill or agent — the skill-creator's own namesake artifacts. Drives the skill-forge loop (create → fill → validate → critique → ship → publish) via the skill-creator CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a deliberative two-model committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus under a selectable chair, Fable by default, with `/model-committee-astra`, `/model-committee-opus`, and `/model-committee-sol` selecting the others. Use when a consequential decision has several defensible options and two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank them against a predeclared rubric before converging, as in research design, interpretation, architecture, manuscript strategy, or evaluation design. Not for factual lookups, independent-coder reliability, brainstorming, routine implementation, or final professional judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。