「dan」の検索結果

Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for instrumenting webapps with Azure Application Insights. Provides telemetry patterns, SDK setup, and configuration references. WHEN: how to instrument app, App Insights SDK, telemetry patterns, what is App Insights, Application Insights guidance, instrumentation examples, APM best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and improve the reliability posture of PaaS Applications (Azure Functions and Azure App Service). Scans deployed resources for zone redundancy, ZRS storage, health probes, and multi-region failover. Presents a feature-pivoted checklist, then drives staged remediation (CLI or IaC patches) end-to-end with user confirmation. WHEN: "assess reliability", "check reliability", "zone redundant", "multi-region failover", "high availability", "disaster recovery", "single points of failure", "reliability posture", "resiliency".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Differential abundance testing for microbiome data using compositionally-aware methods like ALDEx2, ANCOM-BC2, and MaAsLin2. Use when identifying taxa that differ between experimental groups while accounting for the compositional nature of microbiome data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for choosing the right protein binder design tool. Use this skill when: (1) Deciding between BoltzGen, BindCraft, or RFdiffusion, (2) Planning a binder design campaign, (3) Understanding trade-offs between different approaches, (4) Selecting tools for specific target types. For specific tool parameters, use the individual tool skills (boltzgen, bindcraft, rfdiffusion, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critique a rendered screen's affordances — what looks clickable, state visibility, CTA clarity, and action discoverability. Use when reviewing an existing screen. For sizing and positioning targets in new work, use `fitts-law` (interaction-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dangling markup injection playbook. Use when HTML injection is possible but JavaScript execution is blocked (CSP, sanitizer strips event handlers, WAF blocks script tags) — exfiltrate CSRF tokens, session data, and page content by injecting unclosed HTML tags that capture subsequent page content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making mistakes", "this is unintuitive", or "people cant figure out how to use it". Also trigger when reducing product complexity or feature creep. Covers the gulfs of execution and evaluation. For usability scoring, see ux-heuristics. For iOS-specific patterns, see ios-hig-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating stocks through Dan Bin's long-term compounder lens: buy great companies, hold through volatility, and let time do the work. Focus on consumer, pharma, and tech compounders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be considered when you need to answer reflow machine maintenance questions or provide detailed guidance based on thermocouple data, MES data or defect data and reflow technical handbooks. This skill covers how to obtain important concepts, calculations, definitions, thresholds, and others from the handbook and how to do cross validations between handbook and datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Mandantenmail AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Mandanteninterview AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

文章转手绘图解 B-roll——输入公众号文章(正文或链接)，优先抽取原文配图，把文章逻辑做成一支手绘线稿风格的动态图解视频，并调用真实视频模型(火山引擎 Seedance 2.0 或 libtv Agent)逐帧生成「手绘生长」动效，拼成成片。白底、黑色单线图标、单一蓝色强调、细曲线箭头，默认 4:3，垫在口播下方。当用户说「文章转图解视频」「手绘图解 B-roll」「白板动图」「把这篇文章做成动态图解」「Seedance 出 B-roll」时触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a reference video and reverse-engineer its style into a reusable Seedance 2.0 prompting template. The output is a new skill/formula (like seedance-2-ugc.md) that captures the video's structure, pacing, camera work, edit style, and tone so it can be recreated with any product, any person, in any setting. Use this whenever someone provides a video they want to use as a style reference, says "I want to make videos like this", "deconstruct this video", "turn this into a template", "analyze this style", or drops a video file and wants to recreate that format repeatedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and retrieves AI video and image-related assets via the Arcads external API (Seedance 2.0, Sora 2, Veo 3.1, Kling, Grok Video, Nano Banana, b-roll, scene, script/actor flows). Loads prompts from the bundled prompting guide and model library, respects HTTP Basic auth from ARCADS_API_KEY, and polls assets/videos until ready. Use when the user mentions Arcads, external-api.arcads.ai, Seedance, Sora2, Veo, Kling, Nano Banana, b-roll, UGC scripts, or generating marketing creative through Arcads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for instrumenting webapps with Azure Application Insights. Provides telemetry patterns, SDK setup, and configuration references. WHEN: how to instrument app, App Insights SDK, telemetry patterns, what is App Insights, Application Insights guidance, instrumentation examples, APM best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and improve the reliability posture of PaaS Applications (Azure Functions and Azure App Service). Scans deployed resources for zone redundancy, ZRS storage, health probes, and multi-region failover. Presents a feature-pivoted checklist, then drives staged remediation (CLI or IaC patches) end-to-end with user confirmation. WHEN: "assess reliability", "check reliability", "zone redundant", "multi-region failover", "high availability", "disaster recovery", "single points of failure", "reliability posture", "resiliency".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidates redundant documentation while preserving all valuable content; keeps a doc set truthful after things change. Modes: (1) POST-CHANGE GOVERNANCE — when code, scripts, config, env vars, ports, paths, deployment, auth, tests, or a documented procedure changed; also "which docs are now wrong", "check docs for inconsistencies", "过时的命令/路径", "文档同步". Use it even when the user mentions only the change and never the docs — updating them is part of the change, not optional cleanup. (2) CONSOLIDATION — "clean up docs", "documentation bloat", "reduce documentation sprawl", "consolidate documentation", "too many doc files", "merge redundant docs", "merge these docs", "文档太多/太乱", multiple files covering the same topic, or documentation exceeding 500 lines across multiple files on similar topics. Finds stale copies of a fact changed in only one place, values that should never have been persisted (counts, totals, "N items", restated summaries), rival definitions that drift apart, and orphaned cross-references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INVOKE THIS SKILL when you need human-in-the-loop approval, custom middleware, or structured output. Covers HumanInTheLoopMiddleware for human approval of dangerous tool calls, creating custom middleware with hooks, Command resume patterns, and structured output with Pydantic/Zod.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

the UGC fix-loop toolkit — surgically re-render a bad window/beat of a single-take UGC master (stitch_replacement.py, pure FFmpeg) and GPT cross-model review a Seedance prompt before render (vet_seedance_prompt.py, routed through the openai-proxy). Fetch it into a one-shot UGC recipe so both scripts resolve on any machine and the vet call bills the Ads agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble the FREE steps of the product-hypermotion + kinetic-typography video format — dice ONE Seedance 2.0 hypermotion clip into 5-6 segments and intercut them with PIL kinetic-typography spec/CTA cards (italic skew, 1.08x outline echo, 3D extrusion, slam-with-shake, inversion flash) plus a real-logo PIL end card (base64-decoded from the brand SVG), center-crop 1:1 to 9:16, and explicit-map mux a music bed. Deterministic, FREE (PIL + FFmpeg), no paid calls, the real logo and spec typography stay pixel-crisp. The paid steps (the ONE Seedance i2v, the music) are separate capabilities; the recipe orchestrates them. Use for the product-hypermotion format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Processes eDNA metabarcoding from raw paired-end reads to species tables, navigating ASV (DADA2, UNOISE3) vs OTU (swarm v2) decision (Callahan 2017 vs Schloss multi-copy-16S critique), marker/primer choice (Leray COI, MiFish 12S, 515F/806R 16S, ITS2) with primer-specific bias, OBITools3 v3 command-name break (obi stats plural; .tar.gz taxonomy), tag-jumping with dual-indexing (Schnell 2015; NovaSeq 10x MiSeq), decontam as screening-not-classifier (Davis 2018), read-counts-not-abundance critique (Lamb 2019), site-occupancy modeling (Ficetola 2015), Naive-Bayes calibration limits (Bokulich 2018), and eDNA decay (Strickler 2015). Use when going from raw eDNA FASTQ to species tables, picking marker + denoising pipeline, deciding whether read counts represent abundance, applying occupancy modeling, configuring OBITools3 v3, or interpreting decontam output. Not for clinical 16S microbiome (see microbiome/amplicon-processing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。