「designing」の検索結果

Use when reasoning about what survives compaction/context-loss/restart/seat-refresh, designing a high-fidelity restore packet, or distinguishing native runtime resume vs fork vs artifact-backed mental-model rebuild. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent honest restore (compacted seat drops hot potato; restore packet preserves details but loses product intent; runtime resume mistaken for handover or fork; rebuilt seat starts with stale instructions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, building, operating, or diagnosing an ongoing application whose live backend or control loop includes OpenRig agents, including applications with a Markdown, YAML, or JSON agent control plane or a thin surface over specialist agent roles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring rig specs, agent specs, workflow specs, startup/context fragments, operating-mode declarations, or designing the user spec library. Covers the 4 failure modes (spec instantiates topology but not workflow/mode; spec depends on local paths and fails on another host; agents modify specs as one-off files instead of preserving reusable intent; validation proves YAML shape but not whether topology can run) and the validation-vs-runtime-realization distinction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging how an agent's context window gets filled, pruned, or shared — choosing what loads at boot versus on demand, sizing an install or an always-loaded file, fixing an agent that drifts, repeats itself, or forgets constraints mid-task, planning compaction or summarization, deciding single-agent versus subagents, engineering handoffs between agents, or picking a tool loadout. NOT for rewording a prompt's tone, choosing which model to pin, or debugging business logic — those are adjacent moments this skill does not serve. Historical 2024–2025 snapshot; not normative for present-day frontier models — see the Status section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reasoning about the rig lifecycle operations family (create / start / stop / resume / restore / snapshot / release / unclaim / destroy), reading or trusting `rig ps` / lifecycle projections after recovery, or designing proof for a lifecycle scenario. Covers the 4 failure modes (auto-restore creates partial rig; projections report healthier than reality; provider auth treated as impl work; resume succeeds for one runtime fails another) plus the restore-honesty rule (failed resume is FAILED loudly — no auto fresh fallback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when classifying a slice closeout (auto-continue / human gate / park), routing a real decision to a human, or designing a human queue/dashboard surface. Treats humans as durable network participants with attention surfaces, queues, and decision records — escalation lands as a durable attention item, not a chat message. Approval is NOT required for every clean closeout; the default RSI conveyor continues unless an explicit human gate is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing OpenRig's own source in a clone of the openrig repository: finding which package or file owns a behaviour, choosing which tests to run, testing a change without disturbing the OpenRig daemon your own session runs on, judging whether a diff touches a high-risk area, or preparing a pull request. Not for operating rigs (openrig-skills) or designing rig topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing multi-agent topologies that run ON OpenRig — authoring RigSpec and AgentSpec files for new rigs, creating agent startup content (guidance / skills / culture), or diagnosing why a launched rig's agents aren't behaving as intended. NOT for changing OpenRig itself (use developing-openrig); NOT for ordinary CLI operation of an existing rig (use openrig-user). Covers the full authoring lifecycle from user intent to validated, launchable rig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides design and implementation of evolutionary modular-monolith platforms with DDD (strategic + tactical), flat-by-aggregate organization, an Anti-Corruption Layer for vendor independence, a transactional outbox for events, smart resilience (backoff with jitter, circuit breakers, idempotency), and a polished architecture HTML document with elegant SVG diagrams. Use when designing a platform or backend, defining bounded contexts, organizing modules and folders, choosing monolith vs microservices, decoupling from an external service (ERP, storage, AI), making calls resilient, adding real-time push, picking a 2026 TypeScript stack (Nx, NestJS, React), or producing an architecture document or diagram. Also triggers on 'modular monolith', 'bounded contexts', 'flat-by-aggregate', 'ports and adapters', 'architecture diagram'. Do NOT use for simple CRUD, NestJS-only deep implementation (use nestjs-modular-monolith), or pure domain-model review (use tactical-ddd).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for designing and building high-quality skills from scratch through structured conversation. Use when someone wants to create a new skill, build a skill, design a skill, or asks for help making Agents do something consistently. Also use when someone says "turn this into a skill", "I want to automate this workflow", "how do I teach my Agent to do X", or mentions creating SKILL.md files. Covers standalone skills and MCP-enhanced workflows. Do NOT use for creating subagents (use subagent-creator) or technical design documents (use create-technical-design-doc).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated Rails conventions: rich models, concerns, CRUD-everything, state-as-records, minimal dependencies, Minitest with fixtures. Load this skill BEFORE any code-level thinking, not only before editing a file. It is required the moment a task touches Rails code in ANY way: designing or even just discussing a data model, schema, migration, entity, association, field, validation, class, or method name; writing, planning, reviewing, analyzing, testing, debugging, or refactoring; or proposing any model, table, column, route, or code snippet inline in chat. If you are about to name a model or sketch a column you are already in scope, even in an exploratory back-and-forth where no file is written yet. Do not let a "we're just discussing" framing defer it. Do NOT use for non-Rails backends, NestJS, or general architecture (use nestjs-modular-monolith or coding-guidelines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes. Do NOT use for React/Next.js performance optimization (use react-best-practices instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing/implementing UI with Tailwind CSS (layout, typography, responsive, theming, component patterns). Includes quick recipes and conventions for clean, consistent web design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or rewriting a high-converting landing page (single-offer page) for SaaS/apps/services. Covers structure, layout patterns, conversion strategies, copywriting, SEO/AEO, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or rewriting a high-converting SaaS pricing page (structure, plan design, copywriting, SEO/AEO, FAQs, layout patterns, experiments). Includes checklists, templates, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or implementing product-grade web motion like Stripe, Linear, Apple, and Vercel. Covers motion principles, easing/duration defaults, choreography patterns, scroll/hover interactions, performance, accessibility (reduced motion), and implementation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, editing, validating, testing, or debugging an n8n workflow through the n8n-mcp MCP server — designing a flow, configuring a node, writing an expression or Code node, wiring credentials, or fixing one that misbehaves. The entry-point skill for the n8n-mcp-skills pack: it routes you to the right specialist skill, gives working knowledge of every n8n-mcp tool from turn one, and states the rules that keep workflows from breaking in production. Always consult it first on any n8n, workflow, node, or automation task — even a quick one-off, and even when the user names no skill — because n8n's surface drifts between versions and the specialist skills prevent silent failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proven workflow architectural patterns from real n8n workflows. Use when building new workflows, designing workflow structure, choosing workflow patterns, planning workflow architecture, or asking about webhook processing, HTTP API integration, database operations, AI agent workflows, batch processing, or scheduled tasks. Always consult this skill when the user asks to create, build, or design an n8n workflow, automate a process, or connect services — even if they don't explicitly mention 'patterns'. Covers webhook, API, database, AI, batch processing, and scheduled automation architectures. Also use when optimizing a slow workflow or speeding up large-item-count processing (node count, batchSize, all-items vs per-item).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive Apache Hudi table design advisor. Turns workload requirements into architecture guidance and an Architecture Decision Record through a tiered conversational flow, with configuration bundles on implemented executable routes. Invoke when a user wants help designing a new Hudi table or evaluating an existing design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, implementing, debugging, or reviewing Nexent relational schemas, FastAPI endpoints, backend services, database access, SQL migrations, or backend/SDK configuration. Includes table/field naming, types, JSONB boundaries, audit fields, keys, and indexes even before code paths exist. Skip frontend-only work and unrelated SDK algorithms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE when asked to migrate, replace, or make testable existing C# static calls with a named wrapper or built-in abstraction: DateTime.UtcNow/Now or DateTimeOffset.UtcNow to TimeProvider/IClock, File.* to IFileSystem or an existing store such as ITextFileStore, and Environment.* to an existing reader such as IEnvironmentReader. Covers scoped files/projects, constructor injection, replacing temp-file or process-environment tests with fakes, "already registered" abstractions, and static classes whose callers/signatures must stay unchanged. Preserves DateTimeKind and call count. DO NOT USE for finding statics (detect-static-dependencies), choosing/designing a new wrapper (generate-testability-wrappers), behavior tests with no chosen seam (testability-obstacle), or test-framework migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan complex Blazor UI features by decomposing them into focused components. USE FOR: building a complex Blazor page with multiple sections, planning component decomposition, designing a multi-section dashboard or layout, breaking down a large UI feature into composable components, pages with sidebars and content panels, any page with 3+ distinct visual sections or multiple interacting sub-features, identifying parent-child relationships and data flow. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new Blazor projects or apps from scratch (use create-blazor-project), implementing a single individual component (use author-component), writing component code with parameters and EventCallback (use author-component), or simple single-component pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。