「dimensions」の検索結果

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates an approved plan across 8 dimensions before build — incomplete acceptance criteria, missing dependencies, unresolved risks. Use after Gate 1, before Test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates an approved plan against 8 dimensions before Phase 3 begins. Catches incomplete acceptance criteria, missing dependencies, and unresolved risks. Use after Gate 1 approval and before Phase 2 (Test). Produces a validation report with pass/fail per dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The sprint completeness oracle — a mechanical, exit-code-driven check that every feature in a sprint manifest is provably complete across three dimensions (a done-record reference, resolvable edge tests, and a resolvable wiring test). Fails loud with a per-feature gap list naming the missing dimension. Read-only. Use to gate a sprint before it is called done (Slice A of the sprint-mode epic), or any time you want a completeness reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up, audit, and debug analytics tracking implementation — GA4, Google Tag Manager, event taxonomy, conversion tracking, and data quality. Use when building a tracking plan from scratch, auditing existing analytics for gaps or errors, debugging missing events, or setting up GTM. Trigger keywords: GA4 setup, Google Tag Manager, GTM, event tracking, analytics implementation, conversion tracking, tracking plan, event taxonomy, custom dimensions, UTM tracking, analytics audit, missing events, tracking broken. NOT for analyzing marketing campaign data — use campaign-analytics for that. NOT for BI dashboards — use product-analytics for in-product event analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates article cover images with 5 dimensions (type, palette, rendering, text, mood) combining 11 color palettes and 7 rendering styles. Supports cinematic (2.35:1), widescreen (16:9), and square (1:1) aspects. Use when user asks to "generate cover image", "create article cover", or "make cover".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Discovers disease-specific stratification dimensions by citing guideline sections from sources/guidelines/. ALWAYS uses cite-based discovery — NEVER built-in stratification templates. Output: .cache/<slug>/staging.json. Use AFTER contract-elicitor and AFTER A1' guidelines fetch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design original, scalable logos and production-ready asset sets for a specific usage context. Use when Codex needs to create or refine a logo, symbol, wordmark, app icon, repository identity, CLI mark, website brand, social preview, or Codex skill/plugin icon; adapt concepts, formats, dimensions, variants, and delivery checks to the target platform instead of producing a context-free image.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Store and Google Play screenshot creation with exact platform specs. Covers iOS/Android dimensions, gallery ordering, device mockups, and preview videos. Use for: app store optimization, ASO, app screenshots, app preview, play store listing. Triggers: app store screenshots, aso, app st...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a discovery call brief from what the user has on a prospect (CRM record, inbound form, emails, notes, public material the user supplies): what is known with sources, gaps against the qualification dimensions, hypotheses to test, questions in priority order and what to listen for. Returns a DRAFT Markdown brief in the chat. Use when the user asks to "prep me for the discovery call with <prospect>", "what should I ask on this first call", "intro call brief", "questions for the qualification call" or "what do we know before we speak to them". Do not use for scoring leads against a rubric, use lead-qualification-scorer instead; for an existing customer's account review use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

From a KiCad board to a parametric enclosure that fits it: ERC and DRC clean, board dimensions extracted, an OpenSCAD case with your clearance, Gerbers exported, fab hand-off only after GO. Use for "PCB to enclosure", "case for this board", "KiCad to OpenSCAD case".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Use when: (1) "refine this", "make this better", "iterate on this", (2) After /analyst gives a REVISE verdict, (3) Output quality is below 8/10, (4) "run the refinery loop on this". Reads analyst reviews from system/reviews/. Generates, scores, diagnoses, rewrites, re-scores. Stops when all dimensions >= 8/10 or diminishing returns detected. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Scores, diagnoses specific weaknesses, rewrites, re-scores, and repeats until all dimensions reach 8/10 or diminishing returns are detected. Use when you want to refine or iterate on work, after the analyst gives a REVISE verdict, or when output quality is below your bar. Part of the architect-system loop. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using AI observability. Rotates through a set of lenses — cost, latency, errors, volume, eval performance, eval/enrichment config, clusters, and tool usage — watching each for trends and spikes sliced by the dimensions it discovers over time. Leans on the sandbox's bundled `exploring-llm-*` deep-dive skills for the actual queries. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other scouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic clinical trial design feasibility assessment. Analyzes 6 dimensions (endpoint, population, comparator, effect size, duration, regulatory pathway) using precedent trials and FDA guidance. Produces enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and approval-pathway analysis. Use for trial-protocol design, power/sample-size estimation, comparator selection, and FDA submission strategy. Driven by precedent-based reasoning rather than first-principles math.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resize and convert manuscript images to KDP-compliant dimensions at 300 DPI for print-on-demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resize and crop a single image into platform-specific dimensions for social media.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a PR review request to the correct tool — code-review plugin (quick parallel scan across all dimensions) or pr-review-toolkit (deep-dive on a specific quality dimension such as type design, error handling, test quality, comments, or simplification). Use when the user asks for a code review, PR review, or mentions a specific quality concern before creating a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates article cover images with 5 dimensions (type, palette, rendering, text, mood) combining 9 color palettes and 6 rendering styles. Supports cinematic (2.35:1), widescreen (16:9), and square (1:1) aspects. Use when user asks to "generate cover image", "create article cover", or "make cover".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。