「ena」の検索結果

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You are reviewing housing management software or tenant management systems - Someone asks about Section 8, LIHTC, or public housing program compliance - You need to audit unit allocation algorithms for fairness or bias - A project involves waitlist management, income verification, or rent calculations - You are evaluating HUD compliance (50058, EIV, PIC submissions) - Someone mentions Fair Housing, reasonable accommodation, or protected class handling - You need to review HQS/NSPIRE inspection tracking or abatement workflows - A codebase handles tenant eligibility, subsidy calculations, or housing vouchers TRIGGER PHRASES: "affordable housing", "Section 8", "LIHTC", "public housing", "waitlist management", "income verification", "Fair Housing", "HUD compliance", "rent calculation", "housing voucher", "tenant management", "HQS inspection", "unit allocation", "housing authority"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic OpenAPI 3.x guidance — spec structure, metadata and versioning, paths and operations, reusable schemas, security schemes, examples, documentation quality, contract validation (e.g. Spectral), breaking-change awareness, and handoffs to codegen — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review an OpenAPI; Improve an OpenAPI; Improve API contract; Improve API schema design. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Router v8 (Framework Mode、旧 Remix) の RR8 リファレンス。 loader, action, middleware, routes.ts、hooks (useLoaderData, useActionData, useFetcher, useNavigate, useNavigation, useParams, useSearchParams)、 コンポーネント (Form, Link, NavLink, Outlet, Route, Routes, Await)、SSR / SPA / Static、 ErrorBoundary, redirect, defer, session, matchPath, matchRoutes, type-safe routing。 TanStack Router (@tanstack/react-router) とは別ライブラリ。

Kubb (OpenAPI / Swagger コードジェネレーター) リファレンス。 kubb.config.ts、OpenAPI から TypeScript 型・TanStack Query フックを生成するコード生成プラグイン・ Zod スキーマ・MSW モック・Faker・Axios / SWR / React Query クライアント生成。 プラグインベース、モノレポ対応。 parser-ts / parser-md パーサー、adapter-oas アダプター、Kit API・diagnostics。 TanStack Query 本体の API は tanstack-query スキル。

Android アプリ開発 (Kotlin) のテストリファレンス。JUnit4, Espresso, テストピラミッド。 テストダブル, Mockito, MockK, Truth, Robolectric, coroutines/Flow/ViewModel テスト。 AndroidJUnit4, ActivityScenario, FragmentScenario, UiAutomator, AndroidTestOrchestrator。 createComposeRule, Compose UI テスト同期。

Change what something MEANS before you change what it IS — Rory Sutherland's cheapest lever. Use when a product, price, feature, or message is objectively fine but feels cheap, generic, boring, overpriced, or unjustified; when the user says 'how do we make this feel more premium/valuable/exciting', 'people don't get why it's worth it', 'how do we reposition/rename/repackage this', or wants to raise perceived value without changing the product or cutting the price. Covers renaming, recategorising, mental accounting (price framing), creating artificial value, and context-shifting. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「高いと言われる」「安っぽく見える」「値下げせずに高級感を出したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“被说太贵”“显得廉价”“不降价也想显得高级”）也适用。

Azure OpenAI SDK for .NET. Client library for Azure OpenAI and OpenAI services. Use for chat completions, embeddings, image generation, audio transcription, and assistants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rename a thesis file when company name changes. Atomically updates filename, all inbound wikilinks across the vault, graph adjacency entry header, sector note Active Theses entry, snapshot snapshot_of references, and _hot.md mentions. Use when company changes name (FB → META, Square → Block, etc.), or when correcting a typo in a thesis filename.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure OpenAI SDK for .NET. Client library for Azure OpenAI and OpenAI services. Use for chat completions, embeddings, image generation, audio transcription, and assistants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about CMV maintenance program requirements under 49 CFR 396.3 — what records must be kept, retention periods (12-18 months on vehicle file + 1 year after disposal), what counts as systematic inspection/repair/maintenance, preventive maintenance scheduling, brake adjustment records, and what auditors look for in vehicle files. Cite 49 CFR 396.3 + 396.21.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and identify the CCSPlayer_ItemServices_GiveNamedItem virtual function, the CCSPlayer_WeaponServices_Weapon_GetSlot helper, and the CBasePlayerPawn_RemovePlayerItem helper in CS2 binary using IDA Pro MCP. Use this skill when reverse engineering CS2 server.dll or libserver.so to locate GiveNamedItem by RTTI-walking the CCSPlayer_ItemServices vtable, then to locate the other two by decompiling the already-known CCSPlayer_ItemServices_GiveDefaultItems anchor and matching its callees' argument shapes and inventory-slot bookkeeping semantics. Trigger: CCSPlayer_ItemServices_GiveNamedItem, CCSPlayer_WeaponServices_Weapon_GetSlot, CBasePlayerPawn_RemovePlayerItem

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure OpenAI SDK for .NET. Client library for Azure OpenAI and OpenAI services. Use for chat completions, embeddings, image generation, audio transcription, and assistants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates OpenAPI 3.0/3.1 specifications from Express, Next.js, Fastify, Hono, or NestJS routes. Creates complete specs with schemas, examples, and documentation that can be imported into Postman, Insomnia, or used with Swagger UI. Use when users request "generate openapi", "create swagger spec", "openapi documentation", or "api specification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Okta-as-IdP red-team attack chain — tenant discovery, user enumeration (multiple vectors), authentication flow analysis (factors enumeration, push-notification fatigue, SMS bypass), password spray with lockout discipline, Okta-specific phishing primitives (kits, FastPass abuse, OIDC redirect_uri tampering), MFA enumeration, post-compromise admin API surface. Many enterprise orgs use Okta instead of (or alongside) Entra ID. Distinct endpoints, distinct rate-limiting, distinct factor flows. Use when recon shows `<tenant>.okta.com`, `<tenant>.okta-emea.com`, `<tenant>.oktapreview.com`, or autodiscover-style records pointing at Okta IdP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

記憶用のWikiをObsidianで扱いやすく整えるスキル。ノート間リンクや冒頭の属性情報を整備し、ファイル名の変更に伴うリンク修復や利用環境の確認も行います。

• 記憶用WikiをObsidian向けに整備
• ノート名変更後のリンク修復
• 生成部分と手書きメモを併用したいとき

Telegramの下書きと最終メッセージが届く順序を、OpenClawのQA Labで検証するスキル。QA Channelと実際のTelegramプラグインで同じシナリオを実行します。

• Telegramの下書きと最終配信を確認
• QA Channelで配信フローを検証
• 実際のTelegramプラグインで検証

繰り返すLLMへのAPIリクエストで、共通の指示や資料を再利用しやすく並べるスキル。キャッシュ利用量と費用、応答時間を確認し、構成の見直しを支援します。

• 繰り返すAPIの共通指示を並べ替え
• キャッシュの読み書きと保存費用を試算
• キャッシュ利用率と応答時間を測定

AIエージェントがスキルやルールを実際に守るか、指示の強さが異なる３段階のシナリオで検証し、遵守率とツール呼び出しの時系列をレポートにまとめます。

• 追加したルールの遵守確認
• 念押しなしで手順が守られるか確認
• ツール実行順序と抜けの確認

フロントエンドとバックエンドやサービス間で共有するAPI・イベントの仕様を先に定め、型の生成と実際の応答の検証を通じて、並行開発で起きる食い違いを防ぐスキル。

• フロントとバックの並行開発
• サービス間のAPIやイベント形式の統一
• モックと本番応答を照合したいとき

Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for docs-api-openapi - invoke with $agent-docs-api-openapi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports structured what-if scenario analysis for research planning, experimental contingencies, and scientific project decisions. Explores favorable, reference, adverse, wild-card, contrarian, and second-order scenarios with explicit assumptions, evidence, and decision triggers. Use to stress-test a research plan under uncertainty; scenario narratives do not estimate causal effects or calibrated forecast probabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。