「evidence」の検索結果

Clarifies a vague clinical or biomedical research idea into a structured, bounded, searchable, researchable, and testable question. Always use this skill whenever a user has an early-stage clinical or research thought, an over-broad topic, an ill-defined evidence question, or an unclear problem statement that must be translated into a question framing suitable for literature retrieval, evidence synthesis, gap analysis, study design, or downstream protocol planning. Never jump straight to answering the substantive medical question unless the user explicitly asks for that. Focus first on question framing, boundary setting, and downstream-ready formulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ranks papers by evidence family, methodological quality tier, validation depth, and claim discipline; assigns anchor, context-setting, mechanistic support, or caution citation roles; prevents prestige-based or design-label-based ranking errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and submit evidence-backed XQUIC GitHub bug issues in the repository's CONTRIBUTING and issue-template format. Use when preparing or opening an alibaba/xquic issue that must identify an exact RFC or draft mechanism, expected-versus-actual behavior, reproduction evidence, and optional verified source root cause; requires issue-check to return true before any GitHub submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches evidence-based analysis of transaction logs and traces. Use when reconstructing transaction behavior from tables, TSV/CSV files, timestamps, counters, object histories, validation records, abort records, retries, partial logs, or when producing classified transaction outputs from trace evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-hop evidence search + structured extraction over enterprise artifact datasets (docs/chats/meetings/PRs/URLs). Strong disambiguation to prevent cross-product leakage; returns JSON-ready entities plus evidence pointers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize durable ktx wiki pages and semantic-layer sources from staged Notion pages, databases, data-source rows, and clustered Notion evidence. Load when a WorkUnit contains Notion raw files or Notion evidence chunks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, refresh, report, or probe an accessibility coverage matrix across criteria, surfaces, and evidence methods. Use when assessing coverage with the accessibility runtime harness and generated evidence bundle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or assess an evidence-grounded, falsifiable outcome hypothesis: a testable prediction of what measurable business result will change, for whom, by when, and how leading and lagging indicators will prove or disprove it. Use when framing measurable outcomes, turning an MVP, POC, feature, or technical initiative into a beneficiary result, defining targets and indicators, or judging whether evidence is strong enough to invest. Also applies to business outcome hypotheses, value hypotheses, and outcome statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and validate durable data and ML feasibility studies using the Feasibility Study Interchange Profile, constrained YAML authority, UUID URN identity, lifecycle lineage, and evidence traceability. Use when assessing whether available data and technical evidence support a proposed outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get foreign qualifications, degrees, or professional licenses recognised in a new country — figure out whether recognition is even needed, which body assesses it, what evidence they want, and the bridging route if there's a gap. Use when someone says 'get my degree recognised abroad', 'is my foreign license valid here', 'credential evaluation', or 'can I work as a [nurse/engineer/teacher] in [country] with my qualifications'. Produces a recognition roadmap, the assessing body, an evidence checklist, and the bridging options. Routes to official assessment bodies; requirements are country- and profession-specific.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a specific, non-generic cover letter that connects your evidence to the role. Use when asked to write a cover letter, an application letter, or a note to accompany a resume. Produces a tight 3–4 paragraph letter — a real hook, two evidence paragraphs mapping your proof to the job's needs, and a confident close — tailored to the company, ready to export as a designed PDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Win a chargeback dispute — read the reason code, assemble the evidence packet, and write the rebuttal that actually persuades the bank. Use when asked to fight a chargeback, respond to a payment dispute, write a chargeback rebuttal, or contest a customer chargeback. Produces the reason-code decode, the required-evidence checklist for that code, the structured rebuttal letter, and an honest read on whether this one is winnable — so you fight the right disputes and concede the rest. For merchants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a running brag document of your accomplishments so reviews and promo cases write themselves. Use when asked to start or update a brag doc, log a win, track accomplishments, or prep evidence for a review/promotion. Produces a structured, dated accomplishment log — impact-first entries with metrics, scope, and the evidence link — grouped so it drops straight into a self-review or promo packet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn interview notes into a structured candidate scorecard and hire recommendation. Use when asked to write an interview scorecard, a candidate evaluation, an interview debrief, or to summarize feedback into a hire/no-hire call. Produces a per-competency assessment with evidence and ratings, an overall recommendation with confidence, and the open questions for the next round — evidence-based, bias-aware, and decision-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records visual proof while testing UI behavior — the agent tests the app hands-on via computer use while a screen recording with structured test/assertion annotations captures the session — then posts the video and a results summary to the PR and tracker issue. Use whenever a change needs verifiable evidence that it works, instead of prose claims — including headless environments (scripted screenshots and probes) and non-UI changes (measured numbers, output pairs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FLOW framework integration: evidence-led SEO using the Find → Leverage → Optimize → Win loop. Surfaces stage-specific AI prompts from the FLOW knowledge base (41 prompts, CC BY 4.0). Use when user says "FLOW", "FLOW framework", "seo flow", "evidence-led SEO", "find leverage optimize win", or wants stage-specific SEO prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when targeting Agronomy for Sustainable Development or deciding whether an agronomy / farming-systems manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the explicit-and-evidenced sustainability-contribution bar, evidence and data-reporting expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing ACM CCS experiments, attack demonstrations, adaptive-attack defense evaluations, security measurements, baselines, overhead and cost reporting, ablations, and claim-to-evidence fit, with emphasis on evidence that survives an adversarial program committee rather than leaderboard wins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when strengthening ACM CCS reproducibility evidence, including the artifact-availability posture, threat-model-to-evidence mapping, attack reproduction steps, defense overhead measurement, measurement-dataset provenance, environment and version pinning, and honest justification when artifacts cannot be shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define and generate the manual-first evidence pack for high-risk work. Covers 6 high-risk class definitions and the 5-artifact schema required before finalizing, pushing, or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。