本文へ移動
cccskills

「failure」の検索結果

1,926 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

debugging

無料

MUST USE for any real runtime debugging across ANY language or binary — crashes, silent failures, wrong responses, stuck processes, memory leaks, async misbehavior, unexplained timing, reverse engineering. Runs a hypothesis-driven loop: form ≥3 hypotheses, investigate in parallel, after 2 failed rounds spawn Oracles from orthogonal angles, confirm root cause, lock with a failing test, fix minimally, QA by actually USING the system, scrub artifacts. The actual HOW lives in `references/` — READ THEM. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X not working', 'hanging', 'attach a debugger', 'reverse engineer', 'pwndbg', 'gdb', 'lldb', 'node inspect', 'tsx debug', 'pdb', 'dlv', 'delve', 'rust-gdb', 'set a breakpoint', 'context window exploded', 'why is the response empty', 'attach the debugger', 'debug it', 'why is this happening', 'trace this bug', 'reproduce and fix', 'silent failure', 'HTTP 200 but empty', 'why did it stop', 'inspect the binary', 'reverse engineering', 'playwright'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

code-yeongyu/lazyclaudecode182026年5月29日 更新

실제 run으로 typed-failure 기록을 만들 때의 종결 상태 기대치

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zzunkie/yardlet172026年10月12日 更新

Drafts a court-ready ADA failure-to-accommodate complaint under Title I (employment, 42 U.S.C. § 12112) or Title III (public accommodations, 42 U.S.C. § 12182). Structures jurisdiction, EEOC exhaustion, factual allegations, causes of action, and relief. Use when drafting ADA disability discrimination complaints, reasonable accommodation pleadings, or civil rights complaints for plaintiffs with disabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Use when analyzing harness trace logs to surface recurring failure patterns and suggest harness improvements. Scatter-gather pattern across last N runs with mandatory HITL gate before any change is applied. Triggers on /mk:trace-analyze, "analyze traces", "find patterns in harness runs", or after a model upgrade flagged dead-weight-audit-needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ngocsangyem/MeowKit152026年7月28日 更新

Profiles DAG execution performance including latency, token usage, cost, and resource consumption. Identifies bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Activate on 'performance profile', 'execution metrics', 'latency analysis', 'token usage', 'cost analysis'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Learns from DAG execution history to improve future performance. Identifies successful patterns, detects anti-patterns, and provides recommendations. Activate on 'learn patterns', 'execution patterns', 'what worked', 'optimize based on history', 'pattern analysis'. NOT for failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer) or performance profiling (use dag-performance-profiler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Traces complete execution paths through DAG workflows. Records timing, inputs, outputs, and state transitions for all nodes. Activate on 'execution trace', 'trace execution', 'execution path', 'debug execution', 'execution log'. NOT for performance analysis (use dag-performance-profiler) or failure investigation (use dag-failure-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Interprets GitHub Actions run status and logs, diagnoses CI failure patterns, and suggests targeted fixes. Handles dependency install failures, test timeouts, build OOM, flaky tests, and workflow misconfigurations. Activate on: 'CI failing', 'build broken', 'workflow error', 'GitHub Actions debug', 'flaky CI', 'pipeline timeout', 'CI red'. NOT for: writing new workflows from scratch (use github-actions-pipeline-builder), CI caching strategy (use ci-cache-optimizer), deployment orchestration (use devops-automator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills142026年10月12日 更新

Evaluates the patient’s plan for using injected insulin in case of pump failure, including knowledge of basal-bolus dosing. Triggered by phrases such as 'Discuss sick-day plan for pump failure' or 'Review transition to injections if pump stops'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dromlakhani/MD2SKILL142026年10月5日 更新

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

friedbotstudio/baseline142026年10月13日 更新

harness

無料

End-to-end workflow orchestrator. Walks the 11-phase pipeline, invoking each phase skill in order inside an internal loop, yielding at consent gates (/approve-direction, /approve-swarm, /grant-commit), and exiting cleanly on yield/failure/done. Decides swarm-vs-solo at Phase 6. Auto-loops /tdd on integrate failures that don't require a spec change. The harness_continuation Stop hook is a safety net that re-fires harness only when the loop exited mid-flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

friedbotstudio/baseline142026年10月13日 更新

Use for a pre-mortem, or before committing to a plan, launch or migration: "what could go wrong?", "stress test this plan", "how might this fail?", "risks before we ship". Assumes failure, lists causes, ranks them and sets mitigations. Skip for explaining a failure that already happened.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ysskrishna/ai-agent-skills132026年10月8日 更新

Expert-level metals engineering covering crystal structure, phase diagrams, strengthening mechanisms, steel metallurgy, aluminum alloys, and failure analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

luokai0/ai-agent-skills-by-luo-kai122026年5月6日 更新

Isolate the root cause of ML performance drops, inconsistent evaluations, prediction errors, and training-serving mismatches across data, labels, splits, pipelines, models, metrics, and runtime behavior. Use when investigating a reproducible failure or regression, not routine model selection or general performance validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aiopshwang/data-analysis-ml-agent-skills122026年8月27日 更新

[Testing] Use when you need to drive an integration-test suite to fully green — each round runs /integration-test-verify (whole system by default, or the target named in the prompt), and on ANY failure combines /debug-investigate + /integration-test-review (report-only) to adjudicate the fault (test wrong · test not optimal · source wrong), then /fix to resolve it at the owning layer, then /changes-review on that round's fix diff, then re-runs a FRESH full verify — looping until the whole suite passes its 2-consecutive-green-runs gate with zero failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

duc01226/EasyPlatform112026年8月21日 更新

The case-law chronicle of this repo's major failures — symptom, root cause, evidence, status, and the rule each battle minted — so nobody re-fights a settled battle or re-proposes a rejected fix. Use when a bug/incident looks familiar ("didn't this happen before?"), when you're about to propose an approach that may have been tried and rejected (e.g. shipping a migration from a package), when someone asks "why does rule X exist" / "why is done-by-lgtm a thing" / "what was incident 988", or when a bug-archaeology run hits the shallow-clone wall and needs the pre-June-2026 history. Trigger phrases: "has this broken before", "why can't packages ship migrations", "why did graduation fail", "why is the green-build lesson a rule", "what did we learn from incident NN". (For a live "build is green but the app is broken" symptom, start at crouton-diagnostics-index. NB keep this description free of any space-then-hash sequence — an unquoted YAML scalar treats space-hash as a comment start and silently truncates.)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FriendlyInternet/nuxt-crouton102026年10月14日 更新

Detect RDP brute force attacks by analyzing Windows Security Event Logs for failed authentication patterns (Event ID 4625), successful logons after failures (Event ID 4624), NLA failures, and source IP frequency analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

tdd

無料

Use when implementing a new function, adding a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring with test coverage, or writing a new test. Enforces strict outside-in red-green-refactor TDD with one-failure-per-turn discipline, predict-the-failure-before-every-run checks, hardcode-first minimum changes, triangulation, and property-based testing for large input spaces. Triggers on explicit TDD requests and on any task phrased as "implement", "add", "write a function", "build a feature", or "fix a bug" in a test-capable codebase. Reports red/green validation evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SDiamante13/dotfiles82026年10月2日 更新

Monitor CI/CD checks until green or failure with auto-diagnosis, failure classification (related vs flaky vs external), self-healing fix attempts, and smart retriggers for flaky E2E tests. Use for CI monitoring, pipeline failed, build broken, flaky test, CI red, check status, watch pipeline, Buildkite, GitHub Actions, re-trigger CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mParticle/aquarium82026年9月4日 更新

Turn failures, logs, symptoms, or flaky behavior into a compact repro and verification plan. Use when debugging needs a reproducible failure path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RasputinKaiser/Self-Improvement-Plugin82026年10月6日 更新

Use when diagnosing CopilotKit issues -- runtime connectivity failures, agent not responding, streaming errors, tool execution problems, transcription failures, version mismatches, and AG-UI event tracing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CopilotKit/Generative-UI-Global-Hackathon-Starter-Kit72026年5月27日 更新