「fix」の検索結果

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix a failing scheduled (or standalone) TMDb Integration workflow run — re-run transients, or fix real drift on a branch off main, then PR and (optionally) merge. Use for the weekly Sunday Integration cron failure, or any red Integration run not tied to an open PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test any application — web apps, native macOS apps, Electron apps, CLI tools, interactive REPLs, or anything on screen. Three modes: browser (chromux/CDP, fast, DOM-level), computer (MCP computer-use, screenshot + pixel clicks, any app), and cli (tmux, send-keys + capture-pane for interactive terminals). Auto-selects mode or accepts --browser / --computer / --cli override. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "test this app", "find bugs", "test and fix", "fix what's broken", "dogfood", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "QA this app", "사이트 테스트", "앱 테스트", "브라우저 QA", "화면 보고 테스트해줘", "네이티브 앱 테스트", "screen test". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that report — run the agentic-architecture skill first if there isn't one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a paad/architecture-reviews/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that report — run /agentic-architecture first if there isn't one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Herdr loops for one open GitHub issue (resolve→review→fix) or an existing PR (review→lazy fixer) until CLEAN. Don't use for plain resolution without review, review-only/no-fix requests, backlog automation, or merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The single config quality skill. Two modes: (1) Default — review/wire pending self-improvement proposals. (2) Audit — analyzes skills, rules, CLAUDE.md, project refs, hooks, and agents against the actual codebase to find inaccuracies, trigger overlaps, stale references, and weak rules, then fixes them. Trigger on 'self-evolve', 'evolve', 'config health check', 'audit config', 'check claude setup', 'apply this rule', 'reorganize rules', 'ok' (when proposals are pending). NOT for improving individual skills (use skill-creator), diagnosing code bugs (use diagnose), or fixing broken code (use fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix open failing reviews, invokes /roborev-fix, or provides job IDs; do not use when the user only pastes review findings with no request to discover or close reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to fix open failing reviews, invokes $roborev-fix, or provides job IDs; do not use when the user only pastes review findings with no request to discover or close reviews

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-fix bugs. Observe symptom, find root cause, apply minimal fix, verify, explain in human terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and resolve Course Management Platform CloudWatch alert issues end to end. Use when Codex is asked to inspect a CMP GitHub alert issue, pull dev or production AWS logs, diagnose 5xx responses or failed background work, fix an incident with test-driven development, validate a fix in dev, or deploy and verify an authorized production fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing Craft CMS 5 plugins and modules with Pest — test isolation, database safety, and the markhuot/craft-pest-core harness. ALWAYS load when writing, running, fixing, or reviewing tests for a Craft plugin or module, and whenever a suite touches a real Craft install. Covers why rollback is opt-in, tests/Pest.php + tests/bootstrap.php wiring, phpunit.xml.dist <env> pins (force DB name + table prefix, default connection coordinates, pin CRAFT_ENVIRONMENT against server-scoped locks), why --configuration= defeats DB isolation, throwing fail-closed DB guards, installing the plugin under test, process-timezone pinning, per-test site fixtures, idempotent Install migrations, stale service caches when components get swapped, muting audit sinks, queue stubs, factories, HTTP/DB assertions, CI jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for deterministic prompt prefix engineering, KV-cache locking for Gemini 4 Pro / Claude 5.5 / GPT Astra 6, canonical tool sorting, and achieving 90%+ prompt cache hit rates / Panduan ahli rekayasa prefix prompt deterministik, penguncian KV-cache untuk Gemini 4 Pro / Claude 5.5 / GPT Astra 6, pengurutan kanonikal tool, dan pencapaian 90%+ cache hit rate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original pixel-art "Clawd" crab emotes as pure SVG + CSS keyframe animations (no frame-by-frame GIFs, no raster sprites), and optionally export them to looping GIFs. Each emote is a tiny pixel crab doing an activity — holding a prop, wearing a hat, reacting — built from <rect>/<polygon>/<circle> and animated with @keyframes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to make, add, fix, or extend Clawd / pixel-crab / desk-pet emotes, mascot animations, "表情/图鉴" cards of an animated character, festival or daily-life crab stickers, or asks to turn such SVG animations into GIFs — even if they don't say the word "SVG". Also use it when fixing visual bugs in these emotes ("帽子悬空/hat floating", "脚断开/feet detached", a prop that looks disconnected from the hand), since the fixes follow specific structural rules documented here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adhoc workflow for small targeted changes to existing behavior or appearance, without the full story ceremony. Use when the orchestrator encounters a bug with a clear root cause and surgical solution, OR a small enhancement to something already built (a different icon, wording, spacing, color). Triggers on: 'fix this', 'this is broken', 'the alignment is off', 'that button doesn't work', 'quick fix', 'patch this', 'tweak this', 'change the icon', 'adjust the wording', post-story corrections, or any situation where the write gate blocks a small targeted change. Acts NOW - a defect to file and fix later belongs in /craft:bugs, other deferred work in the notebook. Do NOT use for new features, design exploration, or changes requiring creative spark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when validate-chunk reports test failures specifically, when the user says "tests are failing", "figure out what's wrong with the tests", "fix the failing tests", or when test assertions don't match expected output after chunk implementation. Triages whether the test or the implementation is wrong and fixes the correct one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific validation protocol for verifying fixes work through observation, not assumption. Use when claiming a bug fix, code change, refactoring, or implementation is complete — enforces reproduce-broken-state then define-success-criteria then apply-fix then verify-outcome. Success means observing intended behavior, not absence of errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user encounters "var-annotated" mypy errors, asks to "fix var-annotated errors", "add type annotations to variables", or mentions "Need type annotation for" errors. Provides workflow for fixing missing variable type annotations while respecting forbidden type constraints (no Any, dict[str, Any], list[Any], etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user encounters "no-untyped-def" mypy errors, asks to "fix no-untyped-def errors", "add type annotations to functions", or mentions "Function is missing a type annotation". Provides specific workflow for fixing missing type annotations while respecting forbidden type constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "fix mypy errors", "add type annotations", "fix type checking", "resolve no-untyped-def", "fix mypy type errors", or when working with type hints while respecting StreamFlow's forbidden type constraints (no Any, dict[str, Any], etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。