「gap」の検索結果

Transform client hearing sheets and meeting notes into structured requirements documents. Use when converting raw hearing data (Japanese/English) into formal requirements, generating traceability matrices, identifying gaps/ambiguities, and mapping requirements to WBS items. Triggers include "hearing to requirements", "meeting notes to specs", "requirements traceability", "gap analysis for requirements", or requests involving hearing sheet analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Erstellt oder überarbeitet einen Skill FÜR DIESES ÖKOSYSTEM: delegiert die generische Interview-/Entwurfs-/Eval-Schleife an das offizielle skill-creator-Plugin (Anthropic, Apache-2.0), setzt aber zusätzlich die ellmos-Anforderungen durch, die das offizielle Plugin nicht kennt — Haus-Frontmatter (9 Felder), Kategorie/Sichtbarkeits-Regeln, anbieter-/nutzer-/ellmos-neutrale aber ellmos-sensitive Erkennung via grounding-seed, mitgelieferte config.json (inkl. Lernvertrag) + connections.json, Anbieter-/Vendor-Bewusstsein (State-of-the-Art-Alternativen inkl. eigener ellmos-Komponenten vorschlagen), einen Selbstaktualisierungs-Abschnitt UND einen wiederverwendbaren Lern-/Abdeckungs-Dateisatz (user-usecases.json, usecase-gaps.json, known-providers-and-abilities.json, gap-closing-analysis.json — an skill-creators evals.json und A2A/AgentSkill angelehnt, kein Parallelstandard). IMMER nutzen, wenn ein NEUER Skill für dieses System entstehen oder ein bestehender auf ellmos-Konformität nachgerüstet werden soll — auch bei "erstelle einen Skill", "bau mir einen Skill für X", "skill-creator nutzen", "neuen Skill anlegen", "diesen Skill ellmos-konform machen", "Lernvertrag/Verhaltenscodex für einen Skill anlegen", "Usecase-Abdeckung eines Skills prüfen". Für reines Skill-FINDEN/ROUTEN stattdessen skill-finder, für Landschafts-Audit skill-explorer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks a master document register extract for gaps and returns a DRAFT question list for document control: missing or out-of-sequence revisions, overdue or slipping deliverables, numbering that breaks the project convention, duplicates and incomplete rows, each with row, test and quoted evidence. Never edits the register, re-baselines a date or marks a deliverable complete. Use when the user asks to "check the MDR", "find the gaps in the deliverables list" or "prepare questions on the drawing register". Do not use for drafting a transmittal from a document list, use transmittal-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit recent agent work for recurring manual patterns that have no skill yet, cross-check against installed skills and public skill catalogs (installing beats building), and propose the top two or three as before/after. Read-only analysis. Triggers: "/skill-gap", "what skills should I build", "audit my skills".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "find keywords", "挖词", or "搜什么词"; prioritizes search volume, keyword difficulty, intent, and topic clusters from provided or connected data. Not for competitor-relative coverage gaps — use content-gap-analysis. 关键词研究/内容选题

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze competitors" or "竞品分析"; benchmarks competitor keywords, content, backlinks, AI citations, and traffic share into strengths, weaknesses, and an action plan. Not for a pairwise topic-coverage gap map — use content-gap-analysis. 竞品分析/竞争对手

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

テストは存在するがアサーションが実質何も検証しておらず、実装が壊れても落ちない（常に PASS する）構造を diff-time で検出する。Check 1 missing assertion（テスト本体にアサーションが無い）、Check 2 tautological assertion（定数同士・入力自身・mock の戻り値自身を assert し SUT に依存しない）、Check 3 nonexistent expected literal（assertDontSee / assertNotContains 等の期待文字列が対象ファイルに実在しない）、Check 4 stale expected value（同一 diff で対象の出力が変わったのに期待値が据え置き）、Check 5 unscoped expectation（汎用的な属性・クラスを応答全体に対して assert し対象要素にスコープされていない）、Check 6 swallowed failure（例外の握り潰しや到達しない位置のアサーションで判定が成立しない）、の 6 Check を対象とする report-only。テストの有無は test-existence、未テスト経路の量は coverage-gap、非決定性は flaky-test、命名は test-naming、JS/TS の un-awaited resolves / rejects は vitest-mock-isolation、tdd-ledger artifact ベースの RED/GREEN 検証は plangate-tdd-evidence、.only / .skip / xit / @ts-ignore と空の catch は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器へ委譲する

Use when working with Anecdotes — anecdotes compliance automation platform for managing security programs, controls, evidence, and multi-framework compliance. Covers control monitoring, evidence automation, plugin integrations, gap analysis, and audit readiness. Use when reviewing compliance status across frameworks, tracking evidence collection, analyzing control gaps, or preparing for security compliance audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to analyze competitors' App Store strategy, find keyword gaps, or understand competitive positioning. Also use when the user mentions "competitor analysis", "competitive research", "keyword gap", "what are my competitors doing", or "compare my app to". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: architecture mode, architect this, ADR, C4, PlantUML, system boundary, design decision, PRD gap, high ambiguity, multiple technical approaches, security architecture, data architecture, integration risk, implementability gap, story ticket, or epic ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to map, crosswalk, align, compare, or gap-analyze any two cybersecurity frameworks, control catalogs, or regulatory requirements using NIST IR 8477 Set-Theory Relationship Mapping (STRM). Triggers on terms like "map controls", "crosswalk", "framework alignment", "gap analysis", or producing a STRM CSV output file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive backlink analysis using DataForSEO API. Analyze backlink profiles, find link building opportunities, detect toxic links, compare with competitors, and identify link gaps. Use when user says "backlinks", "link building", "referring domains", "link profile", "toxic links", "link gap", "competitor links", or "domain authority".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orders and orients assembled contigs into chromosome-scale scaffolds from long-range linking data, inserting N-gap spacers (adds no sequence). Covers Hi-C/Omni-C scaffolding (YaHS, SALSA2, 3D-DNA/Juicer), Hi-C read-mapping prerequisites (map each end separately, no mate rescue, dedup, enzyme-aware), reading the contact map for misjoins/inversions/false-duplications, manual curation in Juicebox/PretextView (the VGP/DToL standard), reference-guided scaffolding (RagTag) and its karyotype-erasure hazard, genetic-map (ALLMAPS) and Bionano optical-map integration, chimera-breaking before scaffolding, gap-filling, and telomere/contig-vs-scaffold-N50 QC (tidk). Use when turning contigs into chromosomes with Hi-C, integrating a linkage map or optical map, choosing a scaffolder by available linking data, or judging whether a chromosome-scale assembly is trustworthy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze implementation gap between requirements and existing codebase

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orders and orients assembled contigs into chromosome-scale scaffolds from long-range linking data, inserting N-gap spacers (adds no sequence). Covers Hi-C/Omni-C scaffolding (YaHS, SALSA2, 3D-DNA/Juicer), Hi-C read-mapping prerequisites (map each end separately, no mate rescue, dedup, enzyme-aware), reading the contact map for misjoins/inversions/false-duplications, manual curation in Juicebox/PretextView (the VGP/DToL standard), reference-guided scaffolding (RagTag) and its karyotype-erasure hazard, genetic-map (ALLMAPS) and Bionano optical-map integration, chimera-breaking before scaffolding, gap-filling, and telomere/contig-vs-scaffold-N50 QC (tidk). Use when turning contigs into chromosomes with Hi-C, integrating a linkage map or optical map, choosing a scaffolder by available linking data, or judging whether a chromosome-scale assembly is trustworthy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backlink profile analysis: referring domains, anchor text distribution, toxic link detection, competitor gap analysis. Works with free APIs (Moz, Bing Webmaster, Common Crawl) and DataForSEO extension. Use when user says backlinks, link profile, referring domains, anchor text, toxic links, link gap, link building, disavow, or backlink audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures clause risks, compliance gaps, precedent shifts, contract deviations, regulatory changes, and litigation exposure to enable continuous legal operations improvement. Use when: (1) An unfavorable clause is accepted or slips through review, (2) A compliance deadline is missed or approaching, (3) A new regulation impacts the organization, (4) A contract remains unsigned past SLA, (5) An IP infringement notice is received, (6) New case law changes interpretation in a relevant jurisdiction, (7) A data subject access request reveals process gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create phases to close all gaps identified by milestone audit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Notionのローカル保存データを検索し、ページやデータベースの一覧・件数・同期状況を確認して、必要に応じてMarkdownを書き出すスキル。

• 保存済みのNotionページを探したいとき
• データベース一覧やレポートを確認したいとき
• SQLで保存済みページの件数を数えたいとき