「hygiene」の検索結果

Quick repo-hygiene and consistency checks before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Git workflow, branch strategy, and commit hygiene for the portfolio.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes git workflow guardrails including conventional commits, commit message hooks, branch naming conventions, PR templates, and code review processes. Provides hook configurations, workflow templates, and emergency bypass instructions. Use when users request "setup git hooks", "enforce commit conventions", "add PR templates", or "standardize git workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark branch or pull request needs final diff hygiene, validation selection, commit scope, remote topology, and readiness checked before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a reference list needs APA 7 cleanup, when DOIs must be confirmed real against Crossref or PubMed, when the user asks whether AI-suggested citations actually exist, or when a manuscript needs a citation hygiene pass before submission or defense.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data quality audit on CRM with completeness scoring and specific fix recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical incident-response runbook for a suspected or confirmed ComfyUI / GPU-daemon compromise. Triage, scope, contain, forensic collection, weight-integrity verification, rebuild from clean snapshot, postmortem. NOT for hygiene scans on a healthy box (use supply-chain-defense-for-ml-extensions), and NOT for runtime hardening of a fresh deployment (use gpu-hosted-asset-hardening).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。