「independent review」の検索結果

ALIGN — Agentic Loop Image GeneratioN. Paint a subject in the craft of a reference artwork as executable p5.js, Canvas, SVG or another mark-based medium, replay that craft's real order of work, and improve it through pixel-only independent Codex subagent review. The reference fixes the craft; the subject may be the reference's own scene (千里江山图 → p5.js) or another (清明上河图 → 武汉). Not for one-shot raster image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multi-LLM parallel debate and synthesis. Dispatches prompts to available omega CLI wrappers in parallel, collects independent responses, runs anonymized peer review ranking, and synthesizes via a chairman model. Supports collaboration templates, idle watchdog, inter-agent messaging, worktree isolation, and multi-turn sessions. No server required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent LLM judge evaluates task completion separately from the executing agent, catching false success claims by reviewing task goal, actions taken, final state, and evidence. Produces PASS/FAIL with confidence score and reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation QA planning — independent of /review (the developer chooses whether to run them sequentially or in parallel), only when the change has a running surface worth driving. Interviews the developer to turn the specs and the diff into an executable QA specification (specs/qa/QA-<N>-<slug>.md) that /execute-qa runs. The agent drives browser and shell; the human steps in only at named handoff points. Use only when the user asks to plan manual QA — never trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a read-only parallel Kimi review fan-out across many independent targets. Use only for explicit broad fan-out requests where one subagent per target is the point.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a visual needs repeatable fixed-view rendering and independent rubric scoring. Not for free-form visual review or subjective critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route one eligible transition in Proto UI's governed autonomous-maintenance protocol. Use for maintenance missions, drift discovery, finding verification, accepted remediation, independent maintenance review, run-ledger closure, or residual-risk planning. Do not use for ordinary user-directed development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close one technically complete Proto UI autonomous-maintenance transition after adequate independent review and required validation. Use to synchronize the finding, remediation packet, mission, run ledger, residual-risk queue, and recorded integration decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply one independently reviewable numeric Proto UI package-budget increase for an already accepted capability, using canonical cost evidence and existing development authorization. Use for standalone ceiling transactions, not feature implementation, measurement-policy changes, spending limits, publication or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Do work in an Upstash Box, a sandboxed cloud container driven through the remote Upstash MCP server (mcp.upstash.com), instead of on the local machine. Use when the user asks to run, build, test, clone, or edit something remotely, in a sandbox, in the cloud, or in a box, when the deliverable is a pull request, a public preview URL, or a screenshot of a running app, when the local machine cannot deliver (no GitHub login for gh, no way to expose a port, a dirty or slow local checkout), when several independent tasks should run in parallel on separate machines, a code factory that turns a list of tasks into a list of pull requests, or when the deliverable is a video, screen recording, demo or timelapse of a browser, web app, terminal program or agent run. Applies whenever the session has the box_* and blob_* MCP tools, even when Upstash is not named.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split independent work across parallel agents with explicit boundaries and a parent integration review. Use only when user allows subagents and tasks do not share mutable files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates implementation of all tasks for a feature using an agent team. Respects task dependencies, runs tasks in correct order, parallelizes independent tasks. Does NOT build, run tests, or commit at any point — verification is delegated to the caller (typically `/start-job`, which runs `build-verify` and `pr-review uncommitted` afterwards). Use when the user says "implement all tasks", "run the task sequence", "implement the feature", or wants to execute multiple tasks from a task list end-to-end.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box security audit. Blue-teamer and lead red-teamer run in parallel isolation for an independent first pass — neither sees the other's output during reconnaissance. A synthesis step categorizes findings into four prescriptive buckets (anchoring-suppressed, convergent, blue-flagged-unverified, divergent), producing a unified target list. Focused red-teamers then deep-dive each target. Iterates when exploit chains are discovered. Heavy and thorough by design. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan dependency-aware atomic commits for changes that span multiple logical concerns. Use when a refactor, feature, or API change would benefit from reviewable, independently meaningful commit boundaries. To triage an already-dirty working tree and propose commits for existing uncommitted changes, use `planning-commits` instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates staged or parallel jobs across live-verified coding-agent runtimes (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other installed CLIs) and in-session toolkit subagents. Routes each job by capability and risk tier, isolates parallel writers in git worktrees, captures redacted output, resumes interrupted runs, and blocks completion until an independent arbiter verifies the results. Use when work should be split across multiple runtimes or subagents, run as staged or parallel jobs, and reviewed before handoff. NOT for a single-agent task or the in-session 7-phase flow (use mk:cook / mk:workflow-orchestrator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate complex engineering work across bounded subagents while protecting the main context, preventing edit conflicts, and measuring whether delegation was worthwhile. Use when the user asks to delegate, parallelize, orchestrate, use subagents, fan out a review, or handle a large task with independent workstreams; do not use for small, tightly coupled, or inherently sequential tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare and risk-check the next rolling-wave slice for implementation. Use when the user wants to continue a rolling-wave project, draft one bounded slice in the main context by default, use a fresh planning author only when context or discovery cost warrants it, use a fresh preparation reviewer when semantic risk or uncertainty warrants independent pressure-testing, decompose parallel implementation chunks where appropriate, identify agent, human, either, or hybrid execution fit, write or update docs/rolling-wave/{project}/slices/NNN-slug.md, and mark that slice ready even when other slices are active.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package completed data analysis and ML work so an independent recipient can reproduce the claimed results, verify artifact lineage, and operate the handoff within its stated scope. Use when finalizing a project, study, model package, or review bundle; not for deploying to a live system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an explicitly authorized overnight collaboration with one desktop portal, a durable CLI writer and independent CLI review. Use for unattended work, not routine short tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate a requested unattended sprint with two explicitly selected desktop control surfaces and independent gated review. Requires proven re-entry on both and a current-run human opt-in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Obtain an independent review of the approach and trade-offs in completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an approved plan has independent tasks ready for delegated execution with fresh subagents and two-stage review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach software development through active project work while still producing a working result, maintaining bilingual English and Chinese project documentation, protecting private context, and publishing reviewed updates to GitHub only after confirmation. Use when Codex helps the user create, build, extend, debug, refactor, document, publish, or understand a software project and the user's goal includes learning, mentorship, guided implementation, pair programming, understanding the code, or becoming able to do similar work independently.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。