628 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build and query AI-powered knowledge bases from claude-mem observations. Use when users want to create focused "brains" from their observation history, ask questions about past work patterns, or compile expertise on specific topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent compounding memory for AI agents. 5 default MCP tools: session_start, session_end, remember, recall, check. Full surface (18 tools) available with --full flag. Two-verb model: inhale (session_start) and exhale (session_end). Correction-first memory with decision trail tracking, watch_for warnings, palace rooms with salience scoring, cross-project insight matching, same-day journal merging, ambient recall hooks. Local markdown only. Zero cloud, zero telemetry, Obsidian-compatible. Optional Supabase backend: when configured via `ar setup supabase`, recall() uses pgvector cosine similarity on OpenAI/Voyage embeddings instead of keyword search — same API, semantic understanding. Gracefully degrades to local search if not configured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the knowledge/ base and the .claude/ skills, agents and workflows for staleness, self-contradiction, and drift from their own stated rules — four independent adversarial auditors (two lenses over two trees) verify every load-bearing claim against the current tree, cross-examine each other within their tree, and reach a consensus on if/what needs changing. Use periodically, after a run of deliveries that changed build config, target layout or the skills themselves, or whenever you suspect the docs have aged out of true.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture durable, project-specific learnings from the work just done into the knowledge/ base — gotchas, implementation quirks, things looked up or web-searched, live-API behaviours, and design decisions (as ADRs). Use before opening a PR (it runs automatically in /deliver), or any time you've learned something worth remembering. Records only non-obvious, reusable facts; skips anything already in the repo, CLAUDE.md, or git history.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in understanding and navigating legacy codebases. Covers code archaeology techniques, finding hidden knowledge, mapping dependencies, and extracting understanding from code without documentation. Knows how to read the stories that old code tells. Use when "legacy code, old codebase, understand this code, archaeology, what does this do, no documentation, ancient code, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate READMEs, API docs, changelogs, and knowledge base articles. Covers README structure with personality, OpenAPI-based API documentation, changelogs from conventional commits, typedoc patterns, and support KB articles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds multi-repo context hubs and compiled markdown knowledge maps. Use when profiling repo portfolios or assembling LLM-ready cross-repo knowledge bases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures and hardens Claude Code and Codex MCP servers. Use when connecting databases, APIs, SaaS, building servers, or serving a clearance-filtered knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a sequence where students compare AI's handling of the same question across disciplines, developing a mental model of where AI is reliable vs. distorting based on knowledge type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map knowledge components and skill hierarchies for a cognitive tutoring system or adaptive learning platform. Use when designing intelligent tutoring software or skill-based mastery systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vocabulary learning strategies and retention science for any language -- frequency-based word selection, spaced repetition systems (Ebbinghaus forgetting curve, Leitner system, SM-2 algorithm), cognate exploitation, word family networks, context-based learning, collocations, depth of word knowledge (form, meaning, use), reading progression from controlled to authentic texts, and productive vs. receptive vocabulary thresholds. Use when building vocabulary plans, optimizing review schedules, selecting learning materials, or diagnosing vocabulary gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sync high-value dev knowledge (skills, decisions, lessons) into Google NotebookLM for cloud recall, podcasts, and flashcards. Pairs with Dockit/deep-search. Use for NotebookLM, nlm, knowledge base, skill sync, or cross-machine AI memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when developing, reviewing, packaging, debugging, or answering questions about DeepSeek Harness (DSH) plugins — the plugin-based agent harness on vendored Cordis. Applies the official plugin-development constraints (plugin contract, cordis.yml layers, services/events/effects, tool DSL, bundles/profiles) backed by the dsh-plugin-guide knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to build, refresh, or visualize the repo's knowledge graph — code structure plus the committed wiki/ — via graphify. Produces an interactive graph + a GRAPH_REPORT.md of God Nodes, surprising connections, and suggested questions. Trigger on "/graph", "build the knowledge graph", "graph the repo", "map the codebase", "refresh the graph", "visualize the second brain".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GEO+SEO audit of asdlc.io — analyzes the codebase for Generative Engine Optimization across AI citability, technical infrastructure, content quality, schema markup, and knowledge base discoverability. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate a new source into the project knowledge base. Wraps the agent-knowledge-updater agent. Source can be a local file path, a URL, or pasted content. The updater reads the source, classifies it, identifies which existing library files it touches, makes surgical updates or creates new files, rebuilds the shelf-index, and appends to log.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuild the knowledge base shelf-index with hash-based change detection. Incremental by default — only re-extracts files whose content has changed since the last index. Use after ingesting new sources, after editing library files, or whenever the librarian agent reports a stale index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organize, track, and value a trading card game collection. Covers inventory methods, storage best practices, grade-based valuation, want-list management, and collection analytics for Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when starting a new collection and setting up inventory tracking, cataloging an existing collection that has grown beyond casual knowledge, valuing a collection for insurance or sale, or deciding which cards to submit for professional grading based on value potential.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to create, maintain, query, or visualize a local Markdown knowledge base. ThinkWiki can initialize a wiki, import files or webpages, collect inbox items, answer from existing knowledge, save higher-value outputs, and generate HTML viewer and graph artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work with the @upstash/search TypeScript/JavaScript SDK, a serverless full-text and semantic search database with built-in reranking. Use when adding search to an app or site, creating a search index, upserting documents with searchable content and filterable metadata, running keyword, semantic, or hybrid search queries, reranking results, filtering with SQL-like or structured filter syntax, paginating with range, fetching or deleting documents, resetting an index, or checking index info. Also use when the user asks for site search, product, document, or knowledge-base search, or a managed search service that needs no cluster to run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when needing global or relational understanding of codebases or knowledge corpora. Keywords: GraphRAG, knowledge graph, entity extraction, community summarization, graph traversal, Microsoft GraphRAG.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。