461 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Legacy survey-based DESIGN.md writer redirect. Use for old omd:design requests only to route them to the Core v2 Autopilot or init workflow; this compatibility skill never writes DESIGN.md itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legacy reference token writer compatibility gate during the DESIGN.md Core v2 catalog cutover.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legacy catalog component writer safety gate. Use when component harvesting is requested, but stop before editing until the Core v2 graph-backed catalog writer and readers are available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Archived DESIGN.md impact experiment compatibility gate. Use when an old Lab #01 run is requested, but do not generate new legacy 9/12-section documents; direct new experiments to the Core v2 benchmark track.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference catalog authoring compatibility gate. Core v2 cutover가 끝나기 전에는 신규 legacy DESIGN.md 쓰기를 차단하고 안전한 재개 조건을 설명한다.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legacy deep-reference writer safety gate. Use for old brand migration requests only to prevent retired section/frontmatter writes until the Core v2 catalog migration pipeline is authoritative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
USE ONLY for (1) two or more projects with repeated MSBuild policy, targets, or package versions, or (2) an existing Directory.Build.props/targets/rsp hierarchy with an import, placement, or layering defect. A one-project repo without an existing Directory.Build file is outside scope; do not load this skill. Covers centralizing shared policy and targets, Directory.Packages.props across projects, parent hierarchy/import structure, props-versus-targets placement, and folder/project exceptions. An existing hierarchy defect remains in scope when only one project is affected. For property value or condition semantics use property-patterns. Exclude legacy-to-SDK migration and non-MSBuild systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legacy compatibility alias for the code-testing skill. Do not self-activate for user requests and do not treat this name as a custom agent. When invoked explicitly by older instructions, load code-testing and follow it instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access review. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain or assess Workflow Foundation-based solutions on .NET Framework, especially where long-lived process logic or legacy designer artifacts still matter. USE FOR: WF activities and workflows; designer-backed process logic; long-lived workflow state and persistence; keep, isolate, or replace decisions. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
.NET MAUI safe area and edge-to-edge layout guidance for .NET 10+. Covers the new SafeAreaEdges property, SafeAreaRegions enum, per-edge control, keyboard avoidance, Blazor Hybrid CSS safe areas, migration from legacy iOS-only APIs, and platform-specific behavior for Android, iOS, and Mac Catalyst. USE FOR: "safe area", "edge-to-edge", "SafeAreaEdges", "SafeAreaRegions", "keyboard avoidance", "notch insets", "status bar overlap", "iOS safe area", "Android edge-to-edge", "content behind status bar", "UseSafeArea migration", "soft input keyboard", "IgnoreSafeArea replacement". DO NOT USE FOR: general layout or grid design (use Grid and StackLayout), app lifecycle handling (use maui-app-lifecycle), theming or styling (use maui-theming), or Shell navigation structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair a repeatedly failing Standard paper section from repair_queue.json, or generate an explicitly requested legacy/quickstart scaffold. Do not use it as the formal paper writer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, draft, audit, globally revise, format, and verify a formal mathematical-modeling paper after the Standard evidence gate passes. Use for the sole S7/S8 formal manuscript path, not for legacy micro-unit scaffolds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to write or review programmatic JDBC with Spring — including JdbcClient (Spring Framework 7+) as the default API, JdbcTemplate only where batch/streaming APIs require JdbcOperations, NamedParameterJdbcTemplate for legacy named-param code, parameterized SQL, RowMapper mapping to records, batch operations, transactions, safe handling of generated keys, DataAccessException handling, read-only transactions, streaming large result sets, and @JdbcTest slice testing. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring JDBC (JdbcTemplate, JdbcClient, NamedParameterJdbcTemplate); Apply best practices for Spring JDBC data access in Java code; Detect and fix SQL injection risks in JDBC code; Improve transaction boundaries or exception handling for JDBC operations; Review JdbcClient usage in Spring Framework 7. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A 5-minute gate the coder runs at project kickoff (and again whenever the repo shape changes). Classifies the workspace into Greenfield / Brownfield-large / Mid-size-familiar / Library-SDK, then maps the state to an agent strategy (autonomy, context primitive, tool choice). Use BEFORE picking Cursor vs Claude Code vs Aider, BEFORE turning on repo-map, BEFORE writing the first prompt. Skip only if the same repo was gated within the last day and nothing changed. Search keywords: greenfield vs brownfield, new project vs existing codebase, project setup strategy, legacy codebase agent, where to start a coding agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master ES6+ features including async/await, destructuring, spread operators, arrow functions, promises, modules, iterators, generators, and functional programming patterns for writing clean, efficient JavaScript code. Use when refactoring legacy code, implementing modern patterns, or optimizing JavaScript applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate from AngularJS to Angular using hybrid mode, incremental component rewriting, and dependency injection updates. Use when upgrading AngularJS applications, planning framework migrations, or modernizing legacy Angular code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legacy router from PRD/spec intent to the current Matt Pocock spec and ticket flow. Prefer to-spec and to-tickets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate bacterial and archaeal genomes and plasmids with Bakta's Prodigal/HMM/diamond pipeline. Identifies CDS, ncRNA, tRNA, rRNA, tmRNA, sORFs, CRISPR arrays, oriC/oriV/oriT, and gaps against a curated UniRef-derived database. Produces NCBI-compatible GFF3, GenBank, EMBL, JSON, FASTA, TSV, and a circular genome plot. Use Prokka for legacy pipelines or non-bacterial kingdoms; PGAP for NCBI GenBank submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Best practices, design patterns, and common pitfalls for ROS1 (Robot Operating System 1) development. Use this skill when building ROS1 nodes, packages, launch files, or debugging ROS1 systems. Trigger whenever the user mentions ROS1, catkin, rospy, roscpp, roslaunch, roscore, rostopic, tf, actionlib, message types, services, or any ROS1-era robotics middleware. Also trigger for migrating ROS1 code to ROS2, maintaining legacy ROS1 systems, or building ROS1-ROS2 bridges. Covers catkin workspaces, nodelets, dynamic reconfigure, pluginlib, and the full ROS1 ecosystem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides implementation patterns for Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters), and Domain-Driven Design in PHP 8.3+ with Symfony 7.x. Use when architecting enterprise PHP applications with entities/value objects/aggregates, refactoring legacy code to modern patterns, implementing domain-driven design with Symfony, or creating testable backends with clear separation of concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract, clean, and organize legacy construction data from archives. Migrate historical project data, cost records, and schedules into modern formats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。