「lua」の検索結果

Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when loading, listing, composing, or validating graded evaluation rubrics — PASS/WARN/FAIL grading with weighted criteria and balanced PASS/FAIL anchor examples. Triggers on /mk:rubric, "load rubric", "compose rubric preset", "validate rubric", or evaluator-style code review that needs anchor-grounded judgments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill recommends re-evaluating the need for treatment of other pituitary hormone deficiencies in the postoperative period following surgical intervention for Cushing's syndrome. It is triggered when assessing a post-op CS patient for ongoing pituitary function, evaluating for hypopituitarism, or checking HPA axis recovery with morning cortisol/ACTH stimulation tests and pituitary MRI within 1–3 months.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uma ferramenta para criar e gerenciar addons do Garry's Mod, incluindo scripts Lua, criação de conteúdo e empacotamento de addons. Use quando: desenvolvendo novos addons, escrevendo scripts Lua para GMod, organizando arquivos de addon, ou quando o usuário menciona Garry's Mod, GMod, scripts Lua ou desenvolvimento de addons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Avalia LLMs em mais de 60 benchmarks acadêmicos (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, TruthfulQA, HellaSwag). Use quando benchmarking de qualidade de modelo, comparação de modelos, relatório de resultados acadêmicos ou rastreamento de progresso de treinamento. Padrão da indústria usado por EleutherAI, HuggingFace e laboratórios principais. Suporta HuggingFace, vLLM, APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional financial analysis skill for investment decisions, budgeting, financial statement analysis, and business plan evaluation. Use this skill when you need to analyze financial ratios (profitability, safety, efficiency), calculate DCF/NPV/IRR valuations, perform budget variance analysis, or conduct sensitivity/scenario analysis. Triggers include "analyze financial statements", "calculate DCF", "investment evaluation", "budget variance", "財務分析", "投資評価", "予算差異分析".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill for complete Roblox game development with Rojo — the entry point that knows and unifies the three specialist skills `/rojo` (filesystem→Studio sync, project setup), `/rbx-studio` (editor, MCP, assets, malware scan) and `/game-design` (roles, workflows, GDD). Use this skill for ANY Roblox game-dev undertaking: planning/building/setting up a Roblox game, scaffolding a new project, defining code architecture (Main + manager modules, _G.ClientState + HUD, remotes in GameEnums), avoiding Luau/Roblox pitfalls, or when it is unclear which of the Roblox specialist skills fits — routing happens from here. Also trigger on "develop Roblox game", "build Roblox game", "new Roblox project", "Luau project structure", "how do I organize Roblox code", "Roblox dev setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert en évaluation d'agents IA (benchmarking, human eval, latence, coût, précision, safety testing)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DDD評価エージェント - 戦略的設計・戦術的設計の両面からDDD原則への適合度を評価し改善点を特定。/ddd-evaluation [対象パス] で呼び出し。

MMI評価エージェント - Modularity Maturity Indexによるモジュール成熟度評価（Cohesion/Coupling/Independence/Reusability）。/evaluate-mmi [対象パス] で呼び出し。

評価統合エージェント - MMI評価とDDD評価の結果を統合し、優先度付き改善計画を策定。/integrate-evaluations [対象パス] で呼び出し。

Generate HTML reports and structured metrics from model evaluation results. Creates publication-ready reports with embedded outputs (images, audio, charts) and metrics.json for cross-model comparison. Use when generating reports, writing metrics, creating evaluation summaries, or formatting benchmark results. Triggers on "generate report", "write metrics", "create report", "evaluation summary", "benchmark results", "format results".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` evaluation stream for contradictions between a flag's configured state and its real traffic: evaluation cliffs on healthy flags, ghost flags (code calling keys that no longer exist), response-distribution shifts with no corresponding flag edit, and flag debt (stale, fully-rolled-out, or dead flags still burning evaluations). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous methodology for evaluating ML models on established benchmarks. Covers proper train/val/test splits, baseline verification from original papers, exact metric formula discrepancies, data-leak detection checklist, multi-seed robustness, and honest reporting templates. Use when claiming to beat published baselines, writing methods papers, or auditing existing results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open-source AI observability platform for LLM tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications with detailed traces, running evaluations on datasets, or monitoring production AI systems with real-time insights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。