「method」の検索結果

Ethical security testing methodology - 5-phase pipeline, OWASP checklist, proof levels, structured findings

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; generic analyzer setup with no complexity policy change. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain analysis methodology to diverse audiences. Use when documenting 'how we did this' sections, building trust through transparency, or teaching analytical approaches to stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a complex or risky code change should be split into Kent Beck's two-step method by first making the change easy through behavior-preserving preparatory refactoring, then making the intended behavior change once the design supports it. This should trigger for requests such as Apply two-step change; Make this risky change safer; Refactor before changing behavior; Separate preparation from behavior change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read from a UModel object-graph semantic layer with the `umctl` CLI (MCP alternative noted). Three kinds of read: (1) entities & relationships / topology (`.entity`, `.topo`) and (2) the model itself (`.umodel`, and `.entity_set` methods, including entity-linked `list_skills`) return real rows; (3) metrics & logs (`get_metrics` / `get_logs`) return an executable *plan* — PromQL / Elasticsearch DSL with the entity id pre-substituted — that you run against the backend. Against a PaaS endpoint the same calls return data rows instead of a plan. Use to query or read UModel entities, relations, topology, or model metadata; to read a service's metrics or logs; to look up services and dependencies; or to discover what objects, datasets, and methods exist. For root-cause analysis on top of these reads, see the `umodel-rca` skill. Triggers: UModel, object graph, .entity / .topo / .umodel / .entity_set, query entities, read topology, read metrics / logs, get_metrics / get_logs, list services / dependencies / datasets / skills, 实体查询, 关系/拓扑查询, 读模型, 读指标, 读日志, 查指标, 查日志, 查服务依赖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consensus cell type annotation: runs 10+ algorithms (KNN-Harmony/BBKNN/Scanorama/scVI, CellTypist, ONCLASS, Random Forest, SCANVI, SVM, XGBoost) on a labeled reference and transfers labels via majority voting. Outputs per-method labels, consensus, agreement score. Use when single-method annotation is insufficient or you need ensemble uncertainty for novel states.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured ideation methods: SCAMPER, Six Thinking Hats, Morphological Analysis, TRIZ, Biomimicry, plus more. Decision framework for picking methods by challenge type (stuck, improving, systematic exploration, contradiction). Use when generating research ideas or exploring interdisciplinary connections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user needs to calculate consumption tax (消費税) or determine their tax method (2割特例, 簡易課税, or 本則課税). Trigger phrases include: "消費税を計算", "消費税の申告", "消費税申告書", "2割特例", "簡易課税", "本則課税", "課税売上", "消費税額", "インボイス", "みなし仕入率", "課税仕入".

Provides parameterized testing patterns with JUnit 5, generates data-driven unit tests using @ParameterizedTest, @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource. Creates tests that run the same logic with multiple input values. Use when writing data-driven Java tests, multiple test cases from single method, or boundary value analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement proven sales methodologies (MEDDIC, BANT, Sandler, Challenger, SPIN) across your team. Generate framework-specific questions, score deals, train reps, and enforce consistent qualification. Use when implementing or optimizing sales processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface expert frameworks. Use when creating or evaluating skills, hooks, or agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorously and honestly assess a NEW or proposed covariance / correlation / precision estimator, or a new covariance scoring rule, using precise. Use when someone proposes, asks to evaluate, or wants to compare a covariance methodology. Covers implementing it to the contract, conformance, benchmarking against the registry, out-of-sample validation, and statistically defensible inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methodology for auditing A/B testing of consent banners to ensure compliance with equal ease of acceptance and rejection. Covers CNIL enforcement patterns including the EUR 150M Google fine, dark pattern detection methodology, manipulative design identification, and regulatory-compliant experimentation boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy audit sampling methodology including statistical and non-statistical sampling, sample size determination, stratification techniques, attribute sampling for compliance testing, confidence level selection, tolerable deviation rates, and extrapolation of results to the population. Keywords: audit sampling, statistical sampling, attribute testing, sample size, confidence level, stratified sampling, privacy audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix "ref.listen can only be used within the build method of a ConsumerWidget" assertion error in Flutter Riverpod 3.x. Use when: (1) ConsumerStatefulWidget crashes with "Failed assertion: line 492 pos 7: 'debugDoingBuild'" in flutter_riverpod consumer.dart, (2) ref.listen is called inside initState, addPostFrameCallback, or any lifecycle method other than build(), (3) All widget tests fail with this assertion from scheduler callback. Applies to flutter_riverpod 3.0+ with ConsumerStatefulWidget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Incrementally implement new features in Java repositories from natural language descriptions. Use when adding functionality to existing Java codebases (Maven or Gradle projects). Takes a feature description as input and outputs modified repository with implementation code, corresponding JUnit tests, and verification that all tests pass. Supports method additions, new class creation, and method modifications with proper Java conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update Java test classes and methods to work with new code versions after refactoring or modifications. Use when code changes break existing tests due to signature changes, refactoring, or behavior modifications. Takes old and new code versions plus old tests as input, and outputs updated tests that compile and pass against the new code. Handles method signature changes, class refactoring, assertion updates, and mock modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically complete partial code snippets while satisfying semantic constraints including variable types, invariants, pre/post-conditions, interface contracts, and expected input/output behavior. Use when users provide incomplete code with specific requirements like "complete this function that takes a list and returns sorted unique elements" or "fill in this method body that must maintain the invariant that x stays positive" or "implement this interface method with these type constraints." Produces compilable, executable code with tests and a constraint satisfaction report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation methods analysis, DCF inputs, comparable multiples, P/E ratio, EV/EBITDA, price to book, valuation assumptions, relative valuation, intrinsic value, fair value estimate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardized trade idea template, multi-method price target derivation PE and sales multiple approaches, GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation, base bull bear scenario construction, investment thesis structuring, Zendesk-style case methodology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end pooled and single-cell CRISPR screen analysis from FASTQ to hit genes. Orchestrates library design QC, guide counting, six-stage screen QC (plasmid Gini, replicate Pearson, CEGv2 PR-AUC, copy-number artifact), method-appropriate hit calling across MAGeCK RRA/MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, and Chronos, cancer-cell-line copy-number correction (CRISPRcleanR / Chronos), batch correction for multi-batch screens, and the specialized branches for combinatorial paralog screens, single-cell Perturb-seq, base-editor variant-function screens, prime-editor screens, and in vivo bottleneck-aware screens. Use when analyzing any pooled CRISPR screen end-to-end, choosing the correct hit-calling method by experimental design, integrating copy-number correction into the pipeline, or branching the workflow for single-cell, combinatorial, base-editor, prime-editor, or in vivo variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。