1,248 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Autonomous, report-only documentation review for Mastra docs. Use when auditing changed docs against source, validating contextual code examples or API coverage, checking canonical mastra-docs guidance, or running narrow deterministic checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-user control of cmux topology and routing (windows, workspaces, panes/surfaces, focus, moves, reorder, identify, trigger flash). Use when automation needs deterministic placement and navigation in a multi-pane cmux layout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google Workspace administration via the gws CLI (github.com/googleworkspace/cli). Install, authenticate, and automate Gmail, Drive, Sheets, Calendar, Docs, Chat, and Tasks. Run security audits and use local recipe templates and persona bundles. Use for Google Workspace admin, gws CLI setup, Gmail automation, Drive management, or Calendar scheduling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating project-delivery work across the 8 project-management sub-skills — sprint/velocity analytics, portfolio health, Jira/JQL, Confluence, Atlassian admin, templates, meeting analysis, team comms. Triggers on 'our sprints feel off', 'project health report', 'audit our Jira permissions', 'when will it be done', 'run the delivery loop'. Forks context to route to one sub-skill via a deterministic signal router and returns a digest; can also drive a full goal→plan→execute→verify→close delivery loop through the repo-wide agent-harness with Jira MCP data bridged into the domain's analytics tools. Distinct from product-team (what to build vs how to deliver it), business-operations (internal ops), and engineering/agent-harness (the generic loop engine this orchestrator plugs into).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating product work across the 12 bundled product sub-skills (RICE, OKRs, UX research, design tokens, competitive teardown, analytics, experiments, discovery, roadmaps, spec-to-repo, landing pages, SaaS scaffolding) or the 4 standalone product-team plugins (user stories, Apple HIG, code-to-PRD, research summarizer). Triggers on 'help me prioritize', 'plan a product experiment', 'we ship features nobody uses', 'run the discovery loop', 'is our OST sound'. Forks context to route to one sub-skill via a deterministic signal router and returns a digest; can also drive a continuous-discovery loop (Torres cadence tracker + OST linter as machine gates) or a full goal→plan→execute→verify→close run through the repo-wide agent-harness. Distinct from project-management (how to deliver vs what to build), marketing/landing (from-scratch pages), and engineering/agent-harness (the generic loop engine this orchestrator plugs into).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants to convert any markdown file in their Claude project into a single-file, lightly-interactive HTML — long-form documents (specs, plans, RFCs, reports, explainers), code reviews with diffs and severity-tagged annotations, or slide decks. Triggers on "convert this markdown to HTML", "make this an HTML file", "turn this into an interactive document", "render this report as HTML", "PR writeup as HTML", "slides from this markdown". Forks context to route to one of three converter sub-skills (md-document, md-review, md-slides) based on a deterministic doctype classifier, after the user has run the design-system onboarding once. Refuses if input is under 100 lines (per Shihipar — markdown still wins below the threshold) or design-system isn't onboarded. Distinct from Anthropic's official Playground plugin (which is interactive prompt-tuning controls with sliders/knobs/prompt-copy-back) and from marketing/landing/ (which is a landing-page generator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a security incident has been detected or declared and needs classification, triage, escalation path determination, and forensic evidence collection. Covers SEV1-SEV4 classification, false positive filtering, incident taxonomy, and NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compliance OS — meta-orchestrator that lets compliance teams CONFIGURE which frameworks apply, COMPUTE cross-framework control overlap, SIMULATE internal audits, and CONSOLIDATE evidence across multiple frameworks. Four decisions: (1) Given a company profile, which of the 12 supported frameworks apply (ISO 27001/13485/42001/14971, EU AI Act, MDR 745, GDPR, SOC 2, FDA QSR, NIST CSF 2.0, NIS2, HIPAA)? (2) Across selected frameworks, which controls overlap and how much evidence reuses? (3) For a given framework + scope, what does a realistic mock audit produce — drawing from the 205-scenario library? (4) Across selected frameworks, what's the unified evidence checklist with reuse map? Use when standing up a multi-framework program, planning the annual audit calendar, or preparing for certification stage 1. Does NOT replace per-framework skills (it orchestrates them).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Head of Ops, Knowledge Manager, or TPM-Internal needs to author, validate, or clean up company SOPs and internal runbooks (procurement intake, vendor offboarding, incident-comms cascade, employee onboarding) — including 5W2H completeness checks (Who-What-When-Where-Why-How-HowMuch), cross-link and orphan-page validation across a sprawling Notion/Confluence/Obsidian wiki, KB ingestion + hygiene reporting, and runbook step verification (named owner, expected duration, observable success signal, rollback path, escalation contact). Pairs Ishikawa's 5W2H method, Gawande's *The Checklist Manifesto*, ISO 9001, ITIL v4, and Google SRE Workbook runbook discipline with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools that score completeness, detect anti-patterns, and emit prioritized cleanup lists (e.g., "validate this runbook before it goes into rotation", "audit our Confluence wiki for stale and orphaned SOPs").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Head of People Ops, BizOps lead, or Internal Communications owner needs to draft and sequence an internal-only change-management communication — a re-org announcement, a tool rollout, a policy change, a leadership transition, a layoff, an acquisition close, or an internal product launch — and the audience is employees (not customers). Pairs Prosci ADKAR and Kotter's 8-step change model with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a sequenced touchpoint calendar, a Kotter-compliant primary announcement, an audience-segmented FAQ, and manager cascade talking points; industry-tuned via --profile {tech-startup, scaleup, enterprise, public-company, non-profit}. Triggers on "all-hands announcement", "change comms", "rollout comms", "re-org announcement", "manager talking points", "layoff comms".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chief AI Officer advisory for startups: model build-vs-buy decisions (API vs fine-tune vs in-house), AI risk classification under EU AI Act + US state patchwork, AI cost economics (API-to-self-hosted breakeven), and AI team org evolution. Use when deciding whether to call an API or fine-tune, classifying AI use cases for regulatory risk, calculating when self-hosting pays off, sequencing AI hires, or when user mentions CAIO, AI strategy, model selection, foundation model, fine-tuning, EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, AI governance, model risk, or AI economics. Strategic only — does not duplicate engineering AI/ML skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success. Use when analyzing customer accounts, reviewing retention metrics, scoring at-risk customers, or when the user mentions churn, customer health scores, upsell opportunities, expansion revenue, retention analysis, or customer analytics. Runs three Python CLI tools to produce deterministic health scores, churn risk tiers, and prioritized expansion recommendations across Enterprise, Mid-Market, and SMB segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, repair, validate, visually QA, and package Codex-compatible animated pets and pet spritesheets from character art, generated images, company or prospect brand cues, or visual references. Use when a user wants a lightweight-worker Codex pet workflow, a non-pixel custom pet style, a prospect or company mascot pet, or a full 8x9 animated pet atlas with transparent unused cells, QA contact sheets, and pet.json packaging. This skill composes the installed $imagegen system skill for visual generation and uses bundled scripts for deterministic spritesheet assembly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PostgreSQL database documentation - SQL queries, database design, administration, performance tuning, and advanced features. Use when working with PostgreSQL databases, writing SQL, or managing database systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or modifying real-browser Playwright E2E / functional tests for Handsontable (specs in tests/e2e/, core, wrappers, or walkontable). Covers the Page Object Model, hooking in by data-testid, deterministic web-first waits, wrapper-specific gotchas, recording via the CLI, and the new-vs-modify / E2E-vs-unit decision. NOT for screenshot/visual tests (use visual-testing) or the legacy Jasmine suite (use handsontable-e2e-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clones, analyzes, plans, and migrates legacy codebases (C++, Fortran, Java, Python, C, Shell) from a GitHub URL or local directory to a modern, high-performance, deterministic, 100% Safe Rust architecture, tracking live telemetry across every task bucket, test failure/fix cycle, and Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) stage, and producing a first-person AI storytelling report and interactive HTML infographic. Use when migrating a GitHub repository or local codebase to Rust, porting legacy C++, Fortran, Python, or Java workloads to memory-safe Rust, designing Struct-of-Arrays (SoA) or SIMD Rust architectures, or optimizing Rust ports with LLVM PGO. Don't use for unrelated non-Rust refactoring or single-line syntax questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses, remediates, and manages Identity and Access Management (IAM) access issues on Google Cloud. Supports two distinct operational modes: (1) Requester Flow for developers encountering access denials (capturing error context, self-service PAM JIT activations, elevated developer self-remediation, or logging structured tickets), and (2) Resolver Flow for privileged administrators (authoritative Policy Troubleshooter analysis, deny policy exemptions, least-privilege role discovery, and PAM/IAM provisioning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and resolves Filestore client mount failures on Google Cloud, permission errors (EACCES), and network timeouts (ETIMEDOUT). Use when an NFS mount hangs or fails from a Compute Engine VM, GKE pod, Cloud Run service, or Vertex AI workload, when `mount.nfs` reports "Connection timed out" or "access denied by server", when checking whether VPC ingress firewall rules or `nfsExportOptions` allow a client IP, or when a previously working Filestore share suddenly stops mounting after an administrative change. Don't use for Cloud Storage (GCS) buckets, Persistent Disk, or Cloud NetApp Volumes, and don't use for Filestore capacity scaling or backup and export-policy auditing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mounts Cloud Storage buckets on Google Cloud as a POSIX file system using Cloud Storage FUSE (and the gcsfuse CLI tool). Use when interacting with the gcsfuse CLI or Cloud Storage FUSE mounts: decide whether FUSE, native gs:// reads, or Filestore/Managed Lustre fits a workload, deploy tuned mounts on GKE, Compute Engine, or Cloud Run, enable and size file, stat, and list caches, tune mount flags (--implicit-dirs) or config-file settings, apply workload profiles, keep ML checkpointing safe (rename atomicity, hierarchical namespace/HNS, close-time finalization, concurrent writers), or diagnose slow training, low throughput, or bill spikes with gcsfuse metrics. Covers mount semantics, gcsfuse CLI and config files, GKE gcsfuse CSI driver (Workload Identity principal:// bindings, profile StorageClasses, sidecar sizing), and Cloud Run volume mounts. Don't use for bucket administration or data management without a mount (google-cloud-storage-basics) or fully POSIX-compliant shared file systems (Filestore, Managed Lustre; use gke-storage).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses, predicts, and mitigates node disruptions during Compute Engine host maintenance and hardware or software maintenance events for GPU and TPU workloads on GKE. Use when diagnosing node disruptions, predicting host maintenance events on GPU/TPU nodepools, inspecting node interruption PromQL metrics, auditing node taints, or configuring workload protection strategies (graceful termination, opportunistic maintenance, PodDisruptionBudgets). Don't use for general GKE cluster creation, network policy configuration, or non-disruption workload deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages GKE storage, including PVCs, PersistentVolumes, and Filestore. Use when configuring GKE storage or creating PVCs. For GCS FUSE mounts, use google-cloud-storage-fuse. For diagnosing storage failures (volume attach/mount errors, disk performance/node storage pressure, or Cloud Storage FUSE OOM), use gke-storage-troubleshooting. Don't use for database administration or replication strategies outside volume provisioning context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages GKE application onboarding, covering containerization, deployment manifests, and migration. Use when onboarding or deploying an application to GKE for the first time, or containerizing an app for GKE. Don't use for general GKE cluster administration or upgrades (use gke-basics or gke-upgrades instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。