「outcomes」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Computer Science Professor — diagnosing why a course's DFW (D/F/withdraw) rate spiked, redesigning an intro programming course's assessment structure, staffing TAs and grading load for a large course, deciding what to prioritize pre-tenure, running an academic-integrity (MOSS similarity) investigation, or mapping a curriculum change against ABET student outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a flow-level summary of the current Claude Code session — executive summary, chronological timeline, and outcomes — written into the active feature directory next to spec.md / plan.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate therapy outcome measurement systems for rehabilitation and physical therapy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a rehabilitation or physical therapy platform end-to-end -- evaluate recovery metrics tracking (ROM, strength, balance, gait), patient-reported outcomes (DASH, LEFS, NDI, ODI, PROMIS), home exercise program personalization and compliance tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and document QA test execution cycles - smoke tests, regression suites, exploratory testing sessions, and release readiness checklists. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer needs to structure or report on active testing work. Trigger on phrases like "run smoke tests", "start a regression cycle", "exploratory testing session", "test this build", "release checklist", "is this build stable", "log test results", "what passed and what failed", "document my testing", "create a test run report", or any request to execute and record test outcomes. Also trigger when someone says "we need to test before release" or "can you help me track what I've tested".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build QA quality dashboards, calculate defect metrics, analyze escape rates, and produce quality trend reports. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to measure and communicate quality outcomes. Trigger on phrases like "quality metrics", "defect density", "escape rate", "bug trends", "quality dashboard", "sprint quality report", "test coverage metrics", "QA KPIs", "how is quality trending", "defect leakage", "production bugs this quarter", "mean time to detect", "quality scorecard", or any request to quantify, visualize, or report on the quality of a product or testing process. Also trigger when a manager asks "how is QA performing?" or an engineering lead asks "what does our defect data tell us?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a roadmap or backlog to distinguish outcomes from outputs. Use when the user says "outcome vs output", "escaping the build trap", "are we building the right things", "roadmap review", "feature factory", "output-driven team", "we keep shipping but nothing changes", or wants to shift focus from shipping features to delivering value - even if they don't explicitly say "outcome vs output".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design guidance for program outcome measurement in Salesforce nonprofit orgs: logic model structure, indicator taxonomy, impact reporting design, and grant compliance reporting using NPSP Program Management Module (PMM) or Nonprofit Cloud (NPC) Outcome Management. NOT for configuring PMM programs, cohorts and service deliveries - use admin/npsp-program-management. NOT for setting up grant tracking, funding awards and disbursements - use admin/grant-management-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when configuring grant tracking in a Salesforce nonprofit org: NPSP Outbound Funds Module (open-source outfunds managed package) or Nonprofit Cloud for Grantmaking (separate license). Trigger keywords: grant management, funding awards, disbursement tranches, grantmaking setup, OFM, FundingAward, FundingDisbursement, FundingAwardRequirement. NOT for recording donor gifts and receipts, use admin/gift-entry-and-processing. NOT for reporting program outcomes to a funder, use admin/program-outcome-tracking-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run work as an explicit event-driven state machine executed by subagents. The orchestrator is the runtime from the canonical loop — `state, effects = init(machine); execute(effects); while state is active: event = nextEvent(); state, effects = transition(machine, state, event); execute(effects); return state.output`. All routing judgment is authored ONCE, at plan time, into a machine file (states, event alphabet, transition table, budgets, final states); at runtime the orchestrator does pure table lookups and dispatches effects — it never decides, never authors, never ingests artifacts. Subagent/sync protocol is the timeboxed-iterating one: role prompts scaffolded once to disk and dispatched BY PATH, an initialiser preamble every subagent reads first, a self-populating cheatsheet, per-unit files, tiny structured returns, independent measurement gate. Use when the user says "workmachine", "run this as a state machine", "state-machine this", or when a goal has a small number of clearly named phases with explicit outcomes (built / passed / failed / blocked) and you want the routing to be auditable rather than judged on the fly. For clock-driven loops use timeboxed-iterating; for wide graphs with judged edge criteria use workgraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record final outcomes to history.md, not intermediate requests or reversed decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes LLM requests to a local model first (Ollama, LM Studio, llamafile), validates the response quality, and escalates to cloud only when the local result fails. Tracks local vs escalated vs cloud outcomes in a persistent dashboard. Use when: (1) user asks to run a task with a local model first, (2) user wants to reduce cloud API costs or keep requests private, (3) user wants post-outcome quality validation before committing to a local result, (4) user asks to see token savings or the routing dashboard, (5) any request where local-vs-cloud routing should be decided automatically with a quality gate. Supports Ollama, LM Studio, and llamafile as local providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Notion to track meeting patterns, identify communication insights, and improve team coordination. Record decisions, attendees, and outcomes for trend analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own goal-first engineering outcomes: investigate, find root cause, design, plan, then delegate implementation unit-by-unit to implementation-loop with verification and honest reporting. Use to fix, build, or own an outcome end to end; investigate-and-fix; "make X work"; or plan-then-execute in one request. A request with an approved plan or equivalently precise spec that needs nothing beyond implementation belongs directly to implementation-loop. Requires implementation-loop and an authenticated backend CLI to execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own goal-first engineering outcomes: investigate, find root cause, design, plan, then delegate implementation unit-by-unit to cursor-implementation-loop, this plugin's kernel skill, with verification and honest reporting. Use to fix, build, or own an outcome end to end; investigate-and-fix; "make X work"; or plan-then-execute in one request. A request with an approved plan or equivalently precise spec that needs nothing beyond implementation belongs directly to cursor-implementation-loop. Requires this plugin's cursor-implementation-loop skill; they ship together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs logistic regression for clinical trial outcomes (binary, ordinal, multinomial) with marginal-vs-conditional estimand reporting per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance, g-computation/standardisation for marginal effects, modified Poisson for RR, Brant test for proportional odds, Firth penalty for separation, and Hauck-Donner detection. Use when modeling binary or ordinal endpoints in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns past decisions into calibrated judgment - scoring old predictions against what happened, assigning credit for delayed results, and separating a bad decision from a good decision that lost. Use during a retrospective, postmortem, quarterly or monthly review, when reviewing decisions taken 30+ days ago, when attributing a result to a cause, or when someone claims to have called something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a flow-level summary of the current Claude Code session — executive summary, chronological timeline, and outcomes — written into the active feature directory next to spec.md / plan.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every progress update, status report, problem explanation, ETA, review, acceptance, or completion report to the operator/owner, especially when they ask “到哪了”, “什么问题”, “做了什么”, “结果呢”, “还要多久”, or “说人话”. Translate technical evidence into visible or operational outcomes before details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill when writing, reviewing, or interpreting behavioral accessibility automation — tests that manipulate a rendered page (resizing the viewport, pressing real keys, capturing and comparing screenshots) rather than only inspecting static markup or a single computed accessibility tree. Covers Reflow risk (SC 1.4.10) and Focus Visible risk (SC 2.4.7) checks. Absolutely always report indicator results separately from confirmed failures. Under no circumstances treat a clean behavioral scan as WCAG conformance, or collapse `cantTell`/test-error/indicator outcomes into a single pass/fail signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户询问 ClinicalTrials.gov / 临床试验 / NCT / 试验注册 / 招募状态 / phase 1/2/3 / RCT lookup / sponsor 检索 / interventional trial / observational study / 主次要终点 / trial outcomes / 试验招募中 / recruiting status 时,通过 ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 实时检索官方注册数据。专注实时单次查询(≤1000 条/请求),典型场景: "某 NCT 试验最新状态"、"BTK 抑制剂 Phase 3 在招募试验"、"某试验已发布的主次要终点结果"。明确边界: 批量 >10k 试验 / 全库 SQL 历史分析 → aact-bulk-trials; 关联 PubMed 文献 → pubmed-eutils; RCT 自动 GRADE 评级 → medical-evidence-grading; 引用入报告附录 → evidence-appendix-sync。跨平台无锁(Claude Code / Codex / Cursor 通用)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design phishing and social engineering simulations with explicit authorization and measurable outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。