「pe」の検索結果

When the user wants to monitor competitor apps on an ongoing basis — tracking metadata changes, keyword shifts, screenshot updates, rating trends, or new features. Use when the user mentions "competitor monitoring", "track competitors", "competitor alert", "competitor changed their title", "watch a competitor app", "competitor weekly report", "competitive intelligence", or "what changed in competitor's listing". For a one-time deep competitive analysis, see competitor-analysis. For market-wide chart movements, see market-movers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official HeyGen plugin for OpenClaw — adds HeyGen as a first-class provider for the built-in video_generate tool. Identity-first avatar videos: pick an avatar_id, a voice, a script, and get an on-brand presenter video back. Use when: (1) generating a video where a specific avatar/person speaks specific lines, (2) "make a video of me / our brand presenter", (3) outreach, announcements, pitch decks, product walkthroughs, or any presenter-led video, (4) needing landscape or portrait output with deterministic aspect ratios, (5) integrating HeyGen into an OpenClaw agent through the standard provider interface (no bespoke REST glue required). Covers: HeyGen v3 Video Agent (api.heygen.com), avatar-presenter video, identity-preserving video, talking-head AI video, scripted avatar narration, brand spokesperson video. NOT for: cinematic b-roll (use Veo / Runway / Kling), video translation, TTS-only, streaming avatars, or photo-to-talking-head v2 pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Why expensive, wasteful, effortful, or self-deprecating actions build trust and desire — Rory Sutherland on signalling. Use when the problem is credibility or desirability rather than meaning: the user asks 'why don't people trust us', 'how do we look more credible/committed/premium', 'is our guarantee/warranty worth it', 'should we spend on brand advertising', 'how do we justify a higher price', or wonders why a cheaper-looking competitor wins. Covers costly signals (advertising spend, guarantees, over-delivery), price-as-quality-signal (Veblen goods), and the Pratfall Effect (admitting a real flaw to gain trust). Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「信頼されない」「安心してもらえない」「強気な価格で売りたい」「広告費に意味はある？」）にも使う。中文咨询（“不被信任”“想以高价出售”“广告费有意义吗？”）也适用。

The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live developer experience audit. Uses the browse tool to actually TEST the developer experience: navigates docs, tries the getting started flow, times TTHW, screenshots error messages, evaluates CLI help text. Produces a DX scorecard with evidence. Compares against /plan-devex-review scores if they exist (the boomerang: plan said 3 minutes, reality says 8). Use when asked to "test the DX", "DX audit", "developer experience test", or "try the onboarding". Proactively suggest after shipping a developer-facing feature. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx audit", "test the developer experience", "try the onboarding", "developer experience test".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable skill knowledge from academic papers and research articles, assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or create new ones. Load when the user asks to learn from a paper, extract insights from a research paper, turn a paper into a skill, apply paper findings to skills, read this paper and improve my skills, or process a research article. Also triggers on "skill from paper", "learn from this paper", "paper to skill", "extract from this research", "apply this paper", or when the user uploads or links to an academic PDF or paper URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes species-environment relationships with constrained ordination (CCA, RDA, db-RDA), variance partitioning, indicator species (indicspecies IndVal.g group-equalized), PERMANOVA paired MANDATORILY with PERMDISP (Anderson & Walsh 2013; dispersion confounds centroid tests), Joint Species Distribution Models (HMSC, sjSDM, gjam) with explicit rejection of "residual covariance equals biotic interaction", phylogenetic community ecology (SES_MPD/MNTD), trait-environment via RLQ + fourth-corner with corrected modeltype=6 (Dray 2014), bipartite network metrics (NODF, modularity) with curveball null (Strona 2014), and Mantel-test replacements (dbRDA, GDM) for spatial data. Use when testing how environmental gradients structure communities, identifying habitat indicator taxa, partitioning variance among predictors, deciding whether PERMANOVA significance is location vs dispersion, picking among HMSC/sjSDM/gjam, or replacing Mantel tests for landscape data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawのベータ版・安定版・長期保守版の準備、公開、復旧、検証を進めるスキル。承認済み修正の移植や検証記録、公開後の確認まで扱います。

• OpenClawのベータ版・安定版の準備
• 承認済み修正を長期保守版へ移したいとき
• 中断した公開を復旧したいとき

OpenClawのプラグインを公開前に検証し、導入・削除、設定修復、起動、SDK互換性や配布パッケージの動作を確認して、結果と未検証項目を整理するスキル。

• 公開前に同梱プラグインの導入・削除を確かめたいとき
• ベータ版をクリーンな環境で検証したいとき
• 設定修復とgateway起動を確認したいとき

OpenClawの複数のIssueやPRについて、担当を分けて原因調査と修正、検証を進め、許可された範囲でマージや解決済み案件のクローズまで管理するスキル。

• 複数のIssueやPRの修復管理
• 既存の修正PRを仕上げたいとき
• 修正済みIssueの検証とクローズ

OpenClawのテスト中に起きるメモリ増加や不足を調べます。測定結果やメモリ内の記録を比較し、実際の解放漏れとテスト実行側の保持を見分け、修正を検証します。

• Vitestのメモリ不足を調べたいとき
• 同一プロセスのメモリ記録を比較したいとき
• 解放漏れとモジュール保持を見分けたいとき

既存のOpenClaw Gatewayを導入環境に合った管理手順で更新し、再起動後のセッション復旧と、目的のバージョンが稼働しているかの確認まで進めるスキルです。

• ローカルのGatewayを更新したいとき
• 管理サーバーの更新手順を選びたいとき
• 再起動後のセッション復旧を確認

OpenClawの脆弱性報告を、公開済みのバージョンと信頼範囲の根拠で確認し、終了・継続・影響の絞り込みを判断して、管理者向けの返信案をまとめます。

• OpenClawの脆弱性報告を判断したいとき
• 公開版に不具合が残るか確認したいとき
• 既存の勧告との重複を調べたいとき

OpenClawの通常版とextended-stable版について、公開先、配布物の出所、テスト結果、Gatewayの実動作を照合し、リリース状況を確認します。

• stable版の公開完了を確認したいとき
• プラグインの配布漏れを確認したいとき
• extended-stable版の証拠確認

OpenClawのブラウザ操作で、ログイン状態やタブを確認しながら複数手順の作業を進めます。古くなった操作対象の参照やタイムアウトへの対処も扱います。

• 複数手順のウェブ作業を進めたいとき
• 操作前にログイン状態を確認したいとき
• タブの再利用と重複整理

macOS上のOpenClawをmainの最新版へ更新し、Gatewayとアプリの動作を確認します。CIの失敗修正や、公開を伴わないリリース検証も扱います。

• macOSのOpenClawを更新したいとき
• 更新後のGatewayとアプリの動作確認
• 現在のmainに対するCIの失敗修正

macOSの画面を確認し、対象のアプリやウィンドウを指定してクリック・文字入力・キー操作などを行い、操作後の結果まで確かめるスキル。

• macOSの画面を保存したいとき
• 指定ウィンドウの入力操作を任せたいとき
• 操作後の画面を確認したいとき