「pinn」の検索結果

This ASE skill uses zizmor to audit GitHub Actions workflows and composite actions for security mistakes before they ship. An agent can scan local repos or remote GitHub repositories, flag risky permission scopes and unsafe workflow patterns, and return plain output, GitHub-native findings, or SARIF for follow-up automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simulate rigorous, fair peer review on a paper — in two modes. (A) Red-team YOUR OWN draft before submission to predict the reviews you'll get and get a fix list. (B) Review SOMEONE ELSE'S paper when you're an assigned reviewer or helping your advisor — produce a fair, venue-formatted, submission-ready review. Use whenever the user gives a paper (PDF, .tex, .md, arXiv link, or pasted text) and wants to predict reviews, find weaknesses before reviewers do, stress-test a submission, OR write a real review of another paper. Grounded in official NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL reviewer guidelines; every criticism pinned to a location, and checked against ACL's H1–H17 list of illegitimate critiques. 两种模式:审自己的稿(投稿前红队)/ 审别人的稿(当审稿人或帮导师),按会议官方标准评,绝不脑补、绝不发不正当批评。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and rewrite a Threads (Meta) profile end-to-end for 2026: profile photo, name with a searchable keyword, @handle, bio (150 chars, warm and specific), link, pinned post, and the connected-Instagram cross-pull that feeds Threads discovery. Triggers on "review my Threads profile", "fix my Threads bio", "what to pin on Threads", and "profile audit". Turns a default profile into one that converts visitors into followers. Not for writing posts (use threads-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "build a scroll animation", "add ScrollTrigger", "pin a section while scrolling", "scrub an animation to scroll", "create a hero timeline", "do a horizontal scroll section", "split text and animate words", "animate a layout change with GSAP Flip", "sync ScrollTrigger with Lenis", "Lenis smooth scroll jittery", "ScrollTrigger markers drift", "ScrollTrigger pins break with Lenis/Locomotive", or "set up smooth scroll with GSAP pinning". Covers GSAP timelines, ScrollTrigger, SplitText, Flip, and Lenis/Locomotive smooth-scroll sync for code-driven web motion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with iOS/macOS Keychain Services (SecItem queries, kSecClass, OSStatus errors), biometric authentication (LAContext, Face ID, Touch ID), CryptoKit (AES-GCM, ChaChaPoly, ECDSA, ECDH, HPKE, ML-KEM), Secure Enclave, secure credential storage (OAuth tokens, API keys), certificate pinning (SecTrust, SPKI), keychain sharing across apps/extensions, migrating secrets from UserDefaults or plists, or OWASP MASVS/MASTG mobile compliance on Apple platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze magnetic levitation systems by applying Earnshaw's theorem to determine whether passive static levitation is possible, then identifying the appropriate circumvention mechanism (diamagnetic, superconducting, active feedback, or spin-stabilized). Use when evaluating maglev transport, magnetic bearings, superconducting levitation, diamagnetic suspension, or Levitron-type devices. Covers force balance calculations, stability analysis in all spatial and tilting modes, and Meissner effect versus flux pinning distinctions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries the NCATS Translator ARAX production API for bounded, typed, provenance-rich one-hop and endpoint-pinned two-hop biomedical knowledge-graph relationships. Use for Biolink-constrained RTX-KG2 lookup, explicit selected-provider ARAX federation, separate entity normalization, qualifier-aware graph traversal, and inspection of TRAPI edge bindings, publications, and knowledge-source provenance. Do not use for inference, ranking, open-ended pathfinding, clinical guidance, or sensitive queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pinning down domain terminology, maintaining the domain model, or when a term conflicts or needs sharpening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure the active Agent model with pinned offline ModelTrace sampling and return an unsigned closed-set attribution record. Use before Agent-originated commits, Issue/PR creation or material updates, comments, reviews, and current collaboration writes in either execution mode. Do not treat a fingerprint, declared model label, or record reference as authenticated identity, permission, independent review, or acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect the pinned, active, and locally available Odylith versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pinned, active, and locally available Odylith versions need inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix silent incorrect results in RFDB Datalog queries that share a variable between two edge atoms on opposite ends (e.g. self-join patterns like `edge(M, C, "T1"), edge(C, M, "T2")`). Use when: (1) a Datalog rule returns rows that look structurally wrong (e.g. a self-loop rule reports hits but pinning M to each reported id refutes the edge existence), (2) Cypher `MATCH (m)-[:R1]->(c)-[:R2]->(m)` returns the same bogus rows (engine-level bug, not Datalog-specific), (3) results change when you bind one variable explicitly vs. leave it free. Root cause: hash- join fast path in `eval_edge_hash_join` / `eval_incoming_hash_join` unconditionally rebinds the non-key Term::Var without checking whether the variable is already bound in the current row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about NixOS, Nix language, flakes, nixpkgs, configuration.nix, nixos-rebuild, modules, options, overlays, derivations, mkDerivation, callPackage, home-manager, nix-darwin, devenv, packaging, cross-compilation, binary caches, garbage collection, NixOS containers, networking, firewall, systemd services, filesystems, LUKS, Wayland, X11, kernel, profiles, NixOS testing or VM tests, ISO images, Docker images, Raspberry Pi, Terraform, distributed builds, remote machines, pinning nixpkgs, rollback, generations, Nix Pills, or any topic related to configuring, packaging, deploying, or troubleshooting NixOS and the Nix ecosystem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for the `odu` runner — how to invoke a full pipeline, a single recipe, or a platform-pinned node, and how to attach to a live run, from a project whose CI odu runs. Trigger when the user asks to "run CI", "run the pipeline", "re-run a check", or names a specific recipe by `<recipe>@<platform>`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing. Use when building motion-rich frontend pages with stricter GPT/Codex design enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TLS/SSL configuration audit. Tests protocol versions (SSLv2/3, TLS 1.0/1.1/1.2/1.3), cipher strength and ordering, certificate chain validation (intermediates, CT logs, OCSP stapling, pinning), known vulnerabilities (POODLE, BEAST, CRIME, Heartbleed, ROBOT, DROWN, Ticketbleed, GOLDENDOODLE), session management (ticket reuse, resumption, fixation), renegotiation attacks, TLS 1.3-specific issues (0-RTT replay, PSK modes, downgrade), HSTS deep analysis (preload, subdomains, bypass), and certificate revocation (CRL, OCSP responder, stapled response freshness). Compliance-mapped to PCI DSS 4.0 (full Section 4), NIST SP 800-52r2, and FedRAMP. Uses testssl.sh, sslscan, sslyze, openssl, nmap NSE scripts, and nuclei SSL templates. Multi-port scanning across 20+ TLS-bearing services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android pentesting playbook. Use when testing Android applications for SSL pinning bypass, exported component abuse, WebView vulnerabilities, intent redirection, root detection bypass, tapjacking, and backup extraction during authorized mobile security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrastructure code review patterns. Use when reviewing CI/CD workflows, Dockerfiles, deployment configs, and IaC. Covers supply-chain pinning, secret exposure, container hygiene, least-privilege permissions, and deployment safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure storage, certificate pinning, biometric auth, jailbreak detection, code obfuscation, network security, screenshot prevention for React Native

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-read pinned on-chain facts and watch documentary source fingerprints behind failure scenarios monthly, reporting drift without approving or changing scenario records automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade Prisma Next in your app. Bumps every `@prisma-next/*` dependency from the version pinned in the lockfile to the requested target (or npm `latest`), applies any required code-translation steps from the per-transition upgrade instructions, validates with the project's own typecheck + tests, and commits each minor step on its own. Use when the user asks to "upgrade Prisma Next", "bump Prisma Next", "move to Prisma Next X.Y", or asks an agent to deal with an `@prisma-next/*` minor bump in their app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clones a STATIC IMAGE ad into finished ads for your own product, into a reusable prompt TEMPLATE, or both — the template is what makes the ads and the ads are what prove the template. Round-trips the frame through gpt-image-2, nano-banana-pro or reve-2.1 until it reproduces, replaces every brand-specific with a {placeholder}, then fills it with your product pinned to a real photo. Use for "clone this ad for my product", "rebuild this competitor's ad for us", "make me ads like this", "reverse engineer this ad", "make this ad reusable", "add this to my prompt library", or "clone my competitors' ads" with NO file attached — it sources one via spy-competitor-ads rather than asking which. **Among cloners the source's medium decides**: a still, or nothing attached, lands here; "clone this ad" plus a VIDEO is clone-video-ad. NOT for generating an ad from a brief (chatgpt-image-ad, nano-banana-image-ad), nor animating a still as-is (image-to-motion). Refuses to render your product without a real photo of it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The investigation harness for "why is this slow?" over a Pulp Perfetto trace (.pftrace). Runs the hypothesis→query→drill-down chain-of-evidence loop autonomously and returns a plain-English root cause + evidence + a concrete fix. TRIGGER on "why is my plugin slow to open", "find the slowest frames", "why is the UI stuttering", "why is my plugin using so much CPU", "which DSP node is expensive", "the load meter looks calm but CPU is pinned", or a named `pulp trace gpu-startup|gpu-health|gpu-probe` analysis. Ships Pulp-specific hints for dsp, frame, js, gpu, and cross-platform symptoms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。