344 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments: question wording, scales and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting, attention and speeding rules, and sensitive questions. Use when writing or revising survey questions, choosing scales, ordering blocks, or planning a pilot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run one consequential, contestable decision through a deliberative committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus, chaired by fable (default), astra, opus, or sol. Not for factual lookups, brainstorming, routine implementation, independent-coder reliability, or final professional judgment. Use when several options are defensible and the two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank under a predeclared rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert prompt engineer specializing in designing, optimizing, and managing prompts for large language models. Masters prompt architecture, evaluation frameworks, and production prompt systems with focus on reliability, efficiency, and measurable outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert payment integration specialist mastering payment gateway integration, PCI compliance, and financial transaction processing. Specializes in secure payment flows, multi-currency support, and fraud prevention with focus on reliability, compliance, and seamless user experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
可靠性工程时使用。适用于 SLO 定义 / 错误预算管理 / Chaos Engineering / 灾备演练。融合 Google SRE SLO + Netflix Chaos Monkey。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare browser-agent reliability on a repeatable task and anti-bot suite before choosing a stack or claiming progress.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Caliper to run real agent tasks with and without a skill, MCP server, or rule change so reliability and token cost are measurable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply MCAF non-functional-requirements guidance to capture or refine explicit quality attributes such as accessibility, reliability, scalability, maintainability, performance, and compliance. Use when a feature or architecture change needs explicit quality attributes and trade-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh evaluation harnesses with live/fallback parser reliability, SLO gates, and regression checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when agent-produced work needs a safety, evidence, and reliability check before handoff, merge, or trust.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when skill or knowledge activation is unreliable, or setup reaches activation reliability. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reliability gate for answers. Forces evidence-based reasoning, explicit uncertainty, and “insufficient information” instead of guesses. Use when user says “be 100% sure”, “no hallucinations”, “only if verified”, “grounded answer”, or when stakes are high.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for correctness, security, architecture, conventions, simplicity, UX, reliability, telemetry, testing, compatibility, and documentation review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reliability gate for answers. Forces evidence-based reasoning, explicit uncertainty, and “insufficient information” instead of guesses. Use when user says “be 100% sure”, “no hallucinations”, “only if verified”, “grounded answer”, or when stakes are high.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate AI agent performance and reliability. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-agent-evaluation related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when rating a source with the NATO Admiralty Scale, the user asks "is this reliable?" / "rate this source", or the tradecraft pipeline calls for source assessment before publishing. Reliability A-F, credibility 1-6.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need Liberty91 platform intelligence — what actually happened (deduplicated Threat Events with every source, Admiralty reliability/credibility and verification stage), whether an IOC is already known to your account, the canonical threat library (actors, malware, vulnerabilities, clusters, ATT&CK TTPs), alert matches, or which of your customer organizations an occurrence affects — or when you need to push intelligence back: ingesting your own report, generating an intelligence package, or uploading an organization document. Also supplies event provenance fields, when the platform returns them, and Threat Library alias resolution to /source-provenance and /quality-of-information-check. Two-way, first-party integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /vulnerability-intelligence. Reads $LIBERTY91_API_KEY.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration. Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design reliable, safe, and trustworthy agent systems that fail gracefully and operate within bounds. Use when building guardrails, handling edge cases, preventing harmful outputs, monitoring for failures, implementing safety constraints, or designing error recovery. Covers failure modes, constraint systems, oversight mechanisms, and safety validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert prompt engineer specializing in designing, optimizing, and managing prompts for large language models. Masters prompt architecture, evaluation frameworks, and production prompt systems with focus on reliability, efficiency, and measurable outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze historical VS Code GitHub Copilot Chat sessions by model, reasoning effort, AIU, time, reliability, workflow behavior, and external quality evidence, or safely prune workspace-scoped local chat history by age. Use for session analysis, repeated-task retrospectives, model evaluation, cost/performance analysis, and old session cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply rigorous survey design principles including construct operationalization, Likert scale development, reliability and validity assessment, and common method variance control. Use this skill when the user designs questionnaires, develops measurement items, needs to evaluate Cronbach's alpha or AVE, or when they ask 'how do I operationalize this construct', 'is my scale reliable', or 'how do I control for CMV'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Combine multiple forecasting models into ensemble predictions for improved accuracy. Use this skill when the user needs to improve forecast reliability, combine ARIMA/Prophet/ETS outputs, or build a robust forecasting pipeline — even if they say 'combine forecasts', 'model averaging', or 'which forecast should I trust'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。