8,516 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Security vulnerabilities in AI-generated code and LLM applications, covering OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, secure coding patterns, and AI-specific threat modelsUse when "ai code security, llm vulnerabilities, ai generated code review, owasp llm, secure ai development, security, ai, llm, owasp, code-review, vulnerabilities" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API Security Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API Security Testing Workflow workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs API security testing workflow for REST and GraphQL APIs covering authentication, authorization, rate limiting, input validation, and security best practices and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API Security Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenStack security operations skill for hardening, certificate management, and security posture assessment of cloud infrastructure. Covers TLS certificate lifecycle (generation, deployment, rotation, expiry monitoring), security group management (default deny, minimum required openings), RBAC policy customization (per-service policy.yaml), network segmentation (management vs tenant vs external), audit logging (Keystone CADF events), vulnerability assessment procedures, compliance auditing, intrusion detection patterns, incident response procedures (credential compromise, instance compromise), password rotation, and API rate limiting. Use when hardening OpenStack, managing certificates, auditing security posture, or responding to security incidents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement Kubernetes security policies including NetworkPolicy, PodSecurityPolicy, and RBAC for production-grade security. Use when securing Kubernetes clusters, implementing network isolation, or enforcing pod security standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit checklist based on OWASP Top 10 and best practices. Covers authentication, injection, XSS, CSRF, secrets management, and more. Use when reviewing security, before deploy, asking "is this secure", "security check", "vulnerability".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit checklist based on OWASP Top 10 and best practices. Covers authentication, injection, XSS, CSRF, secrets management, and more. Use when reviewing security, before deploy, asking "is this secure", "security check", "vulnerability".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security-focused development skill covering OWASP Top 10 and secure coding. Use when implementing authentication, handling user data, or security review. Keywords: security, auth, authentication, authorization, OWASP, XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, secure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Container and Kubernetes security assessment. Tests container escape vectors, Docker/containerd socket exposure, K8s RBAC misconfigurations, pod security violations, exposed API servers, etcd access, service account token abuse, image layer secrets, private registry attacks, SSRF to metadata services, cross-namespace network bypass, CIS benchmarks, crypto miner detection, resource exhaustion, and admission controller gaps. Both external and internal (compromised pod) perspectives. Uses trivy, kube-bench, kubectl, nuclei, dive, amicontained, and docker-bench-security. Covers OWASP Kubernetes Top 10 and all 22 Kubernetes Goat attack scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit codebases for leaked secrets and hardcoded credentials, generate .env templates, configure secrets management with AWS Secrets Manager, Vault, Doppler, or GCP Secret Manager, set up credential rotation, and integrate secrets into CI/CD pipelines via OIDC federation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-production security checklist for Agentforce deployments: agent run-as permission scope, grounding-source data classification, action write-scope, audit trail. NOT for the full go-live readiness gate covering cost telemetry, rate limits, rollout and rollback — use agentforce/agentforce-production-readiness-checklist. NOT for a general org security review — use security/security-health-check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when configuring org-wide platform settings: MFA enforcement, My Domain setup and deployment, session timeout and security settings, password policies, trusted IP ranges (Network Access), and CSP Trusted Sites. Owns these settings as deployable Settings metadata (Security.settings, MyDomain.settings, Company.settings, Language.settings) and the order in which a new org is stood up. Trigger keywords: 'MFA setup', 'My Domain', 'session settings', 'password policy', 'trusted IP ranges', 'CSP trusted sites', 'Security.settings', 'SecuritySettings metadata', 'MyDomainSettings', 'settings-meta.xml', 'enhanced domains', 'deploy org settings', 'new org setup order', 'sessionTimeout enum', 'lockSessionsToIp', 'enableAdminLoginAsAnyUser'. NOT for user-level login restrictions (use user-management), NOT for permission model design (use permission-sets-vs-profiles), NOT for security audit and hardening review (use security/org-hardening-and-baseline-config).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-activate for litestar_security, SecurityPlugin, SecurityConfig, SecureController, CurrentUser, Principal, SecurityContext, or requires_role/scope/tenant/capability/assurance. Not for basic Litestar Guards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a U.S. C-TPAT Security Profile for CBP submission covering physical, personnel, procedural, conveyance, and IT security domains. Use when preparing C-TPAT enrollment, certification, validation, or recertification profiles, or assembling a CBP-ready security narrative. Trigger: C-TPAT, CBP security profile, supply chain security, trusted trader, customs validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auditing Terraform infrastructure-as-code for security misconfigurations using Checkov, tfsec, Terrascan, and OPA/Rego policies to detect overly permissive IAM policies, public resource exposure, missing encryption, and insecure defaults before cloud deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。