1,134 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
给定 PMID/PMCID 取结构化全文（NLM BioC XML/JSON）。封装 BioC PubMed（标题+摘要）和 BioC PMC OA（开放获取全文）端点，输出按章节切分的段落、表格上下文、RAG 友好 chunk，适合大批量入向量库。Fetches structured fulltext from NLM BioC API for PMID/PMCID, outputs section-segmented paragraphs and RAG-ready chunks. 触发词：全文抽取 / BioC / RAG 入库 / 文献全文 / PMC 开放获取 / structured fulltext / 段落抽取 / 表格抽取 / chunking / fulltext to vector store / paragraph extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bulk extract content from an entire website or site section. Use this skill when the user wants to crawl a site, extract all pages from a docs section, bulk-scrape multiple pages following links, or says "crawl", "get all the pages", "extract everything under /docs", "bulk extract", or needs content from many pages on the same site. Handles depth limits, path filtering, and concurrent extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite website image-to-code skill for Codex. For visually important web tasks, it must first generate the design image(s) itself, deeply analyze them, then implement the website to match them as closely as possible. In Codex, it must prefer large, readable, section-specific images instead of tiny compressed boards, generate fresh standalone images for sections or detail views instead of cropping old ones, avoid lazy under-generation, avoid cards-inside-cards-inside-cards UI, and keep the hero clean, spacious, readable, and visible on a small laptop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a release test-impact analysis for a Tamanu version upgrade: compare two Tamanu releases and classify every functional area as Full Test, Smoke Test, or Skip, each with a short reason and the Linear card or PR reference. Use when the user wants a test plan, QA scope, regression scope, or "what to test" for a Tamanu release or upgrade, wants to compare or diff two Tamanu versions (e.g. v2.57 to v2.59), or asks which areas changed between two releases. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.Y branches vs vX.Y.Z tags) and maps changed files and PRs to Tamanu functional sections (Patient Management, Encounters/Charting, Surveys & Programs, Medications, Labs, Imaging, Appointments, Vaccinations, Sync, Settings, Reports, Admin/Permissions, Mobile, etc.). Optionally maps against a regression-testing spreadsheet's sections when one is provided.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write the document of a research run — plan the question and the outline with rs_plan, write prose and declare its claims together with rs_write, choose the claim strength the evidence actually holds, follow the section structure the run's kind maps to, read the draft back, and build a watermarked draft before the gated clean build. Use when a run's document has to be written, a section drafted, a claim bound to a source, or a build attempted.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT quiz from the training content the user supplies (slide deck, manual, e-learning script, session transcript, procedure): numbered questions with the correct answer, distractors drawn from the content itself, an explanation quoting the source passage with its location, a difficulty tag (Recall, Apply, Analyse) with its basis, and a coverage table showing which sections and objectives each question tests and which are left uncovered. Use when the user asks to "build a quiz from this deck", "write knowledge check questions for this module", "create an assessment from this training", "test understanding of this procedure" or "which sections does this quiz cover". Do not use for a reader-facing question and answer page built from documents, use faq-builder instead; for writing the procedure itself from notes or a walkthrough, use sop-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares a changed HR policy with the version it replaces and drafts a clause-by-clause change log, a plain-language DRAFT employee briefing, a manager FAQ answered only from the policy text with clause references, and a list of open questions the people team must settle before release. Use when the user asks to explain, announce, summarise or brief a policy change, a new policy version or an updated handbook section, or says "what changed in the leave policy", "brief managers on the new handbook section" or "compare the old and new versions of this policy". Do not use for a single announcement with no version comparison, use announcement-drafter instead; for an FAQ from documents that are not a policy change, use faq-builder; for contract clauses, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Flags where a P&ID draft raises a process safety question and points to the candidate evidence an engineer would review (HAZOP register, relief study, SIL assessment, isolation philosophy), as questions and quoted passages with UNKNOWN for missing documents, plus safety functions, relief devices and isolation requirements carried over as stated. Never rates, sizes, classifies, resolves or declares protection adequate. Use when the user asks to "write the process safety flags", "produce the process safety section of the P&ID enrichment", "list which protection questions this P&ID raises" or "map the HAZOP and relief study evidence to the draft" after gate G2, once the piping and instrumentation sections exist. Do not use for proposing loops, alarms or trips from the control philosophy, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use for checking identifiers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Takes existing content markdown files and builds production-final resource center pages on client websites using their existing tech stack and design system. Output is live-ready — no review pass, no placeholder content, no prototype styling. Implements hub pages, section listings, article pages, and cross-linking for Blog, Guides, Learn, and Comparisons sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish, restructure, or translate academic prose into Nature-leaning English using writing-strategy principles, curated Nature/Nature Communications article patterns, and phrase-level support from Academic Phrasebank. Use whenever the user asks to polish a manuscript paragraph, abstract, introduction, results, discussion, conclusion, title, methods section, or Chinese academic draft for publication-quality English. Also covers LaTeX layout/typesetting (排版) fixes — loose or sparse pages, stranded section headings, figures that don't fill the page or split across pages, "Float too large", multi-panel figure arrangement, and Supplementary Information that looks empty — via references/latex-layout.md. Also trigger on general academic/scientific writing requests even without the word "Nature", including academic writing, scientific writing, SCI/paper writing, English manuscript polishing, language editing, proofreading, and Chinese phrasings such as 学术写作、科研写作、论文润色、写paper、SCI写作、英文论文润色、语言润色、润色、改写、学术英语、英文写作.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Determine whether to expense or depreciate business assets using the de minimis safe harbor ($2,500), Section 179 ($1,220,000 limit), bonus depreciation (phase-out 2024–2027), or MACRS schedules. Track asset basis, useful life, and accumulated depreciation. Trigger on "depreciate", "Section 179", "bonus depreciation", "capitalize or expense", "asset tracking", "de minimis".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft IA shard sections from reconciled ideation and architecture sources, with write-as-you-go section locking
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility Compliance Specialist IA — Expert en conformité accessibilité (ADA, Section 508, RGAA, EN 301 549, WCAG legal)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform transcripts, conversations, or raw notes into shareable content — either multiple social posts OR a single long-form article. Learns style from user's published content. Handles transcripts of any length (tested up to 5500+ lines / 90+ min). Use when user: (1) provides transcript/conversation/recording and wants social content, (2) asks to "turn recording/notes into posts", (3) mentions generating content from recordings/notes, (4) needs multiple publishable pieces from single source, (5) asks to write an article from a transcript — e.g. "write an article/long-form", "organize into an article", "write up this session", "turn this talk into a blog post", "deep dive". Social mode outputs 2-15 ready-to-publish pieces. Article mode outputs a structured long-form piece (3000-10000+ chars) written section-by-section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vendor (copy-import) a single external Claude Code skill into your own skills repo correctly — with license compliance and full provenance/attribution. Deterministic, idempotent primitive: given an upstream ref (owner/repo/path@sha or a GitHub URL) it fetches the skill, detects and gates on the license, copies the folder, injects a provenance frontmatter block (license + metadata: author/source/upstream_commit/vendored_at/provenance), ships the upstream LICENSE, adds a ## Credits section, and records a CREDITS.md ledger entry. Use when the user asks to "vendor a skill", "import a skill", "clone a skill", "borrow someone's skill", "add an external skill with attribution/credit", or スキルを取り込む / vendoring / 他人のスキルを自分のリポに取り込む. This is the import primitive that a skill-scout/curator orchestrator calls; it does NOT discover or evaluate — it correctly imports ONE skill you already chose.
Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers that pass linting. Use when user wants to scaffold exercises, create exercise stubs, or set up a new course section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews the user section by section to collaboratively produce design documents. Use when creating a design doc, starting feature design, or when the user invokes the design command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-review, audit, or verify CS/AI/ML paper drafts as a critical peer reviewer. Three-round review (evidence→argument→style) with Verification Status and debt tracking. Use when: reviewing a paper draft before submission, checking evidence compliance of claims, simulating peer reviewer feedback, verifying citation closure and evidence debts, performing cross-section consistency checks. Triggers on: 审修, self review, 自查, verification, revise, 修订, check draft, 审稿, evidence compliance, peer review, 论文审查, draft audit, 验证论文, 检查引用, cross-section review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write the merged Pencil design reference back into a UI implementation Issue's description. Takes the Issue number as argument, resolves the merged design PR on the `cc-ui-design-<Issue number>` branch, collects the `.pen` and snapshot paths it added, and appends (or replaces) the `## UIデザイン` section at the end of the Issue body using a lost-update-safe edit.
Targeted deep research to fill a specific gap in an existing thesis. Use when user says "deepen", "flesh out", "expand on", "fill in", or specifies a thesis section to improve. Also supports --sync-metrics mode — detects stale financial metrics across every in-scope analytical section of a thesis (not just Key Metrics or Summary) and coherently updates every sentence that depends on them, using a Key-Metrics-table / FMP / web-search waterfall. Use when user says "sync metrics", "update the numbers throughout the note", or "fix stale figures across the whole thesis". The batch form `--sync-metrics --all-flagged` syncs every thesis flagged by the latest `/numbers --all-open` in one operation — detection fanned out to capped READ-ONLY agents, one consolidated confirmation gate, direct sequential writes (agents never write).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Targeted deep research to fill a specific gap in an existing thesis. Use when user says "deepen", "flesh out", "expand on", "fill in", or specifies a thesis section to improve. Also supports --sync-metrics mode — detects stale financial metrics across every in-scope analytical section of a thesis (not just Key Metrics or Summary) and coherently updates every sentence that depends on them, using a Key-Metrics-table / FMP / web-search waterfall. Use when user says "sync metrics", "update the numbers throughout the note", or "fix stale figures across the whole thesis". The batch form `--sync-metrics --all-flagged` syncs every thesis flagged by the latest `$numbers --all-open` in one operation — detection fanned out to capped READ-ONLY agents, one consolidated confirmation gate, direct sequential writes (agents never write).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze content sequences within a section and provide neutral descriptions for AEM Edge Delivery Services. Invoked per section during page import to identify breaking points between default content and blocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。