「threat」の検索結果

Gather and correlate open source intelligence from public sources for authorized investigations, threat intelligence, and attack surface assessment. Use when the user mentions 'OSINT,' 'open source intelligence,' 'digital footprint,' 'public records,' 'threat intelligence,' 'investigate a domain,' or needs to research a target using publicly available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intelligent pattern selection for Fabric CLI. Automatically selects the right pattern from 242+ specialized prompts based on your intent - threat modeling, analysis, summarization, content creation, extraction, and more. USE WHEN processing content, analyzing data, creating summaries, threat modeling, or transforming text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when hunting threats or engineering detections — ATT&CK Detection-Strategies, Sigma + correlation with Detection-as-Code CI, Windows endpoint hunting (Sysmon/ETW/LSASS/LOLBins), network C2 hunting (JA4+, beaconing, DNS tunneling), cloud-identity hunting, Atomic Red Team purple-team validation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting an engagement, before exploitation, or whenever the attack surface changes — build/validate the threat model and detect drift (new unreviewed surface) before advancing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs a security assessment — threat modeling, vulnerability review, auth flow audit, dependency scanning, or says "is this secure", "review for vulnerabilities", "threat model", "security audit", "pen test prep".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-model product features, APIs, data flows, secrets, permissions, supply-chain changes, auth boundaries, and risky code paths before or during implementation. Use when touching authentication, authorization, payments, secrets, user data, uploads, webhooks, admin tools, innerHTML/eval/exec, dependency upgrades, or cross-tenant access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Cryptography Engineer. Use when a task calls for Cryptography Engineer judgment. Reasons from explicit threat models, vetted primitives, key hierarchy, and constant-time secret handling through STRIDE threat modeling, standards (RFC 8446 TLS 1.3, FIPS 203/204, Ed25519), test vectors (Wycheproof, NIST CAVP), and protocol verifiers (Tamarin, ProVerif) while treating nonce reuse in AEAD, padding/Bleichenbacher oracles, timing side channels, and weak-RNG keys as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Attack Tree Construction workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Attack Tree Construction workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Build comprehensive attack trees to visualize threat paths. Use when mapping attack scenarios, identifying defense gaps, or communicating security risks to stakeholders and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform threat modeling for a system or feature. Use when a senior developer needs security risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-model a sensitive design with STRIDE on request. Read-only analysis of threats, controls, and implementation constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs security audits on codebases — full scans, diff reviews, threat models, vulnerability triage, remediation guidance, and finding tracking. Activate when the user says "security scan", "audit this repo", "review this PR for security", "threat model", "triage vulnerabilities", "fix this vuln", or "track findings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Threat-models and hardens an application, API, data flow, dependency, or deployment against authentication and authorization flaws, injection, secrets exposure, unsafe deserialization, SSRF, abuse, privacy loss, and supply-chain risk. Use for security review, threat modeling, hardening, or sensitive changes. Not for generic code style review or an unexplained bug without a security hypothesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a compromise assessment — hunting scope, methodology, and evidence collection. Use when asked "are we compromised", "run a compromise assessment", or "scope a threat hunt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize multiple per-competitor research files (produced by /competitor-research) into a single canonical threat matrix. Writes to marketing/competitors/aggregate.md as the locked canonical version every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "competitor aggregate", "synthesize competitors", "competitor matrix", "threat matrix", "lock competitor canonical"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intelligent pattern selection for Fabric CLI. Automatically selects the right pattern from 242+ specialized prompts based on your intent - threat modeling, analysis, summarization, content creation, extraction, and more. USE WHEN processing content, analyzing data, creating summaries, threat modeling, or transforming text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use to conduct STRIDE threat modeling for a system or feature design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to build or update a threat-actor profile, "tell me about actor X" / "profile actor Y", or another skill needs the canonical profile template (attribution, TTPs, campaigns, infrastructure patterns, intelligence gaps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to answer "which attacker techniques do our controls actually stop, and how well?", "what controls should I have for this threat?", or "what telemetry should I collect to detect it?" — joining a customer's or your own security control baseline to ATT&CK techniques using a public, versioned evidence base of 9,545 control-to-technique mappings from six sources. Produces four ranked lists (addressed strongly, addressed weakly, real gaps, and techniques no control anywhere addresses). Use for control gap analysis, security programme prioritisation, board reporting on coverage, or the Resistance Strength side of a FAIR risk assessment. Invoke after /threat-actor-profiling or /lookup-liberty91 has produced a technique list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to check whether an organisation/domain has been claimed by a ransomware group, profile a specific ransomware group (TTPs, leak-site infra, IOCs, YARA), or aggregate ransomware victim claims by country/sector/timeframe. Backed by ransomware.live's leak-site scrapes — 27k+ victims across 330+ groups. Commonly invoked by /domain-investigation, /ransomware-ecosystem, /threat-actor-profiling, and detection-engineering workflows. Reads $RANSOMWARE_LIVE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitors dark web forums, marketplaces, paste sites, and ransomware leak sites for mentions of organizational assets, leaked credentials, threatened attacks, and threat actor communications to provide early warning intelligence. Use when establishing dark web monitoring coverage, investigating specific data breach claims, or enriching incident investigations with dark web context. Activates for requests involving dark web OSINT, leak site monitoring, credential exposure, Recorded Future dark web, or Tor hidden service intelligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Christensen's Disruptive Innovation theory to assess low-end and new-market threats to incumbents. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate whether a new entrant poses a disruptive threat, analyze why incumbents fail against inferior-but-cheaper alternatives, or design a disruption strategy targeting overserved customers.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。