2,009 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /changes-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /changes-review (report-only) to surface validated findings over a fixed diff scope, then /fix to resolve them, then loops again with a FRESH full /changes-review over the CHANGED diff until one complete pass produces zero validated findings (nothing left to fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
壊れた GUID / fileID 参照を検出し、一意な置換先のみ `safe_fix`、それ以外は `decision_required` で保留する。ignore-guid file (`<scope>/config/ignore_guids.txt`) と allowlist branch 経由で noise を整理する。 トリガー: `validate_refs` で missing GUID / fileID が出た、Broken PPtr の調査。
Improves Agent Skills via validate → rule-based eval cases → plugin-eval → prompt evals → bounded edits with held-out gates. Use when tuning skill quality, routing, or adopting Chrome/Microsoft T-named quality gates—not for bulk validate-only or SkillOpt automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runnable driver for the deterministic campaign-execution protocol — the automaton that takes a validated campaign DAG to a correctly merged branch. Trigger when: - A campaign has a validated DAG + worker IBCs and the composer (or a cheap-tier runner) must DRIVE dispatch ⇄ reconcile as a loop rather than by hand. - Resuming a partially-executed campaign from its git history + sketch checkpoint after a halt or crash. - Prompt contains: /orchestrate, orchestration, drive the DAG, run the campaign, layer schedule, reconcile-and-merge, resume campaign.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Central entry point of the afonsoft agent harness. Use when starting a new project, resuming an existing one, planning features/Epics/releases, or running any multi-step agent-driven work. Validates and reconciles SPECs (SDD), audits the codebase and harness for gaps (security, architecture, performance, hygiene), proposes improvements, fragments work into GitHub Issues, delegates implementation/QA/review to specialized skills, and re-validates everything until delivery. Also use to review unapproved SPECs, reconcile open GitHub Issues with code, or run a final gap check before closing a release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate current branch follows feature branch naming conventions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
【非推奨】要求の整合性チェックは requirement-management の reqctl.py validate に統合された。既存の docs/sdd/ を保守する場合にのみ使用する。SDDドキュメントの整合性チェック、実装同期確認、アーカイブ（CLAUDE.md同期含む）、ファイル最適化を行う。Do NOT use for 要求の矛盾検出（requirement-management を使用すること）。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory scripts/validate. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when invoking the standalone `event-setup` machine CLI to inspect the environment catalogue, validate or render dotenv input, process configuration manifests or tenant packages, export/import operator-identity portability artifacts, validate legal drafts, or run setup diagnostics; do not use for the interactive terminal UI, browser setup, or API endpoint design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.
Use when validating a packaged build of this Hydrolix Grafana datasource plugin against Grafana's official plugin-validator — the pre-release gate that catches missing metadata, unsigned/mis-signed archives, non-executable backend binaries, and packaging errors. Builds the plugin, zips `dist/` under the plugin ID, and runs `@grafana/plugin-validator` (npx, or docker as fallback). Apply for "validate the plugin", "is this zip release-ready", or before publishing / submitting a release artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate shard load/dependencies, create deep-dive skeletons, update ledger assignments, and generate pipeline tracker
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate ideation completeness through constraints, exhaustion, rubric checks, and output compilation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cache dynamic and static responses on Netlify's CDN from Functions, Edge Functions, and proxies. Use when you add caching or cache-control headers to a function response, tune cache TTL or stale-while-revalidate, set up the durable cache, vary a cache key by query/header/cookie/country/language, purge or invalidate the cache by site or cache tag, use the programmatic Cache API (caches.open/match/put) or @netlify/cache helpers (fetchWithCache/cacheHeaders/getCacheStatus), speed up an expensive API call, add ISR or on-demand revalidation, or debug why a response is or isn't cached via the Cache-Status header.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Caching Specialist IA — Expert en caching (Redis, Memcached, CDN, HTTP caching, stale-while-revalidate)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when implementing form submissions, data mutations, or any 'use server' function in Next.js 16. Trigger words: フォーム送信, mutation, 更新処理, 保存, Server Action, use server, useActionState, revalidatePath, データ更新.
Complete browser automation with Playwright. Auto-detects dev servers, writes clean test scripts to /tmp. Test pages, fill forms, take screenshots, check responsive design, validate UX, test login flows, check links, automate any browser task. Use when user wants to test websites, automate browser interactions, validate web functionality, or perform any browser-based testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
プロジェクトのゴール台帳（registry/goals/<owner>/<repo>.md）を人間と対話して新規作成・改訂する。 README と open Issue からゴール候補を推定して提示し、「何を目指すか」「何が起きていたら未達か」を 短く質問して条項を固め、書式検証（tools/work_discovery_goals.py validate）を通してから保存する。 「ゴール台帳を書きたい」「ゴールを設定して」「ゴール未設定と出た」「台帳エラーを直して」 「このプロジェクトの目標を決めたい」等や、/work-discovery の「ゴール未設定」「ゴール台帳エラー」案内を 受けて窓口が起動する。候補の提示そのものは /work-discovery の役目で本スキルではない。
Visualises and validates a map's pedestrian navigation mesh by sampling walkable locations (get_random_location_from_navigation) and drawing them as debug points. Use when the user asks to "show/visualise the pedestrian navmesh", "check walkable areas", "validate pedestrian navigation after a map import", or "why won't my walkers move". Confirms the navmesh loaded and how far it covers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TanStack Router (型安全 React ルーター、@tanstack/react-router) の API リファレンス。 React Router (react-router) とは別ライブラリ。 createRouter, createFileRoute, createRootRoute, createLazyFileRoute, Link, Outlet, useNavigate, useParams, useSearch, useLoaderData, useBlocker, loader, beforeLoad, validateSearch, redirect, notFound, Await, file-based routing, routeTree.gen.ts, router-plugin, tsr CLI, code splitting, SSR, TanStack Query 統合, eslint-plugin-router。
TanStack Query (React Query) v5 (@tanstack/react-query) の API リファレンス。 useQuery, useQueries, useInfiniteQuery, useMutation, useSuspenseQuery, QueryClient, QueryClientProvider, queryOptions, HydrationBoundary, invalidateQueries, prefetchQuery, staleTime, gcTime, placeholderData, optimistic updates, SSR / hydration, persistQueryClient, eslint-plugin-query。 kubb（フック生成側）とは別。