「verdict」の検索結果

Investigate a Rezolus performance recording (.parquet, .rez, .dendro) through the rezolus MCP server. Discovery before query, verdicts and marks written back, links to the viewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardware verification tool for checking functional equivalence between two RTL designs (Verilog). Use when users need to: (1) Verify if two RTL versions are functionally equivalent, (2) Compare original vs. refactored RTL code, (3) Validate design changes or optimizations, (4) Identify semantic vs. cosmetic differences, (5) Generate counterexamples for non-equivalent designs. Analyzes interface alignment, state variables, logic differences, and produces detailed equivalence verdicts with plain language explanations. Particularly effective for design verification, code reviews, and regression testing of RTL modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine the TRUE cause of a failed retort run before attributing it. Ground-truth every failure (run its tests, read its agent logs, inspect its workspace) and classify it as an infrastructure false-fail, a genuine model miss, or an environment issue — never trust the gate verdict or a log signature alone. Use whenever a run is recorded failed (test_coverage=0 / gate fail), a pass rate looks low, or you're deciding whether a "failure" is real before reporting or proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-event analyst note (conferences, KOL events, site visits) with the professional note anatomy — headline verdict, per-stock takeaways with model numbers, KOL distillation, cross-trial comparison lattices, modeled deltas vs consensus (peak × POS), three what's-changed vectors, risk bullets, and materiality-rated conflicting views. Use after any med event to convert the event into actionable takeaways.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convene a roundtable of sub-agents that debate a decision or proposal from opposing perspectives — parallel independent statements, anonymous cross-review, then a chaired verdict reporting consensus and dissent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates gate criteria before PRD lifecycle advancement by delegating to the readiness scoring pipeline (scripts/readiness.py). Returns a graduated PASS / WARN / BLOCK verdict with top blockers and their causal chain. Triggers before advancing from v0.X to v0.Y or explicit `/ghm-gate-check`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/tribunal", "tribunal", "review this", "3-way review", "risk-value-feasibility check", or wants multi-perspective adversarial review. Also triggered by: "트리뷰널", "리뷰 해줘", "3관점 리뷰", "위험성 검토". Runs 3 agents (Risk/Value/Feasibility) in parallel and synthesizes a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, researches and writes comparison pages: "[rival] alternatives", "[product] vs [rival]", "[rival A] vs [rival B]" and switching guides. Builds each page from a ledger of sourced, dated facts and ends with an honest verdict on who should choose which product. Use when someone asks for an "alternative page", a "vs page", a "competitor comparison", "comparison landing pages", "why us instead of them", or wants existing comparison pages checked for outdated prices and claims that cannot be backed up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Head-to-head SEO comparison of two domains powered by the DataForSEO API. Side-by-side metrics across keywords, traffic, backlinks, referring domains, and shared keyword overlap with a verdict on which domain has the stronger SEO position.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flagship intra-paper self-consistency forensics: does the paper contradict ITSELF across abstract/intro/tables/body/appendix, and does the method DESCRIBED match the method EVALUATED? Needs no external ground truth — works PDF-only (L0). Runs a deterministic arithmetic pass + a fresh cross-model semantic pass, every finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json), reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits consistency-audit.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "consistency audit", "check the paper against itself", "self-consistency", "内部自洽".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load at the start of any task whose deliverable is prose another person will read — a PR description, commit message, README, doc, postmortem, blog post, issue or review comment, report, release note or essay — before drafting it, whether the result is pushed, posted, published or saved to a file, without being asked. Draft, then run this pass on the draft before handing it over. Also use when someone says "de-claude", "de-slop", "humanize this", "this reads like AI", "make it sound human", or asks for a voice, tone or register edit. Rewrites the constructions that mark prose as model-written (staged reveals, verdict headers, aphoristic closers, "it's not X, it's Y", em-dash drama, forced triads, flat-certainty adverbs) into plain technical prose and checks the rewrite kept every claim. Not for fiction, poetry, code, or quoted text; for a full adversarial review of a deliverable use challenging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a diff with the reviewer fleet, funneled to one triaged verdict. Targets the current working diff, a path, or an inbound GitHub PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The parallel fan-out primitive. Routed to by any skill or command that splits work across independent units and dispatches an agent per unit — subagent-driven-development, /sprint, parallel /review. It owns the dispatch/collect/funnel discipline: bound concurrency, isolate units, collect every result, dedupe overlap, and funnel through finding-triage then the read-only verdict-aggregator. Raw agent output is never consumed before the funnel runs; an agent that errors records its unit as incomplete without corrupting the batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit iOS/macOS apps against App Store Review Guidelines before submission, with evidence-backed verdicts and fixes. Don't use for Google Play, general code review, or rejection appeals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check product and brand names for conflicts across trademarks, domains, social handles, and package registries. Returns a risk level and Proceed/Modify/Abandon verdict. Don't use for name brainstorming, logo design, or trademark filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to evaluate whether a change to VoiceDrop's 挖矿 system prompt is actually better than the live version — runs the local eval harness (golden fixtures × champion-vs-candidate, same input), dispatches blind pairwise judge subagents, aggregates a win-rate verdict, and on approval promotes the candidate into agent/src/prompts/mine.js. Triggers — "评估 prompt"、"挖矿 prompt 改好了吗"、"eval prompt"、"比一比两版 prompt"、"/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 王建硕 wants to systematically grow his X (Twitter) followers by running numbered, A/B-testable growth experiments and tracking which ones actually work. Every action gets a number, a hypothesis, a target metric, a before-state (for rollback), and a verdict. The North-Star metric is the new-follower ÷ profile-visit ratio (conversion) — every profile change is judged against it. Daily it ingests the X Analytics CSV export, scores each running experiment, and recommends keep / rollback. Triggers — "涨粉", "增加 X 粉丝", "X 涨粉实验", "follower growth", "A/B test my profile", "今天的涨粉检查", "/wjs-x-increasing-follower".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。