「viewer」の検索結果

PostgreSQLのテーブル設計、検索を速める索引、行単位のアクセス制御を見直し、遅いSQLの調査や接続設定の改善に役立つ実装例を参照するスキル。

• PostgreSQLの遅い検索を調べたいとき
• 索引と列のデータ型を選びたいとき
• 行単位のアクセス制御を設計したいとき

公開前の文章やコードを二つの独立したエージェントが同じ基準で審査し、両方の合格まで修正と再審査を繰り返し、上限を超えたら人へ判断を引き継ぐスキル。

• 公開前に文章の事実関係を確認したいとき
• 顧客向け文章とブランドルールの照合
• 本番配布前に独立した審査を加えたいとき

正常に動いている既存機能を新しい仕様へ変更するスキル。テストを先に更新し、実装の修正、レビュー、承認を挟んだコミットまで順に進めます。

• 既存の通知しきい値を変えたいとき
• 動作中の機能を新仕様に合わせたいとき
• 振る舞いの変更前にテストを更新したいとき

設計書や要件書から、最初から最後まで動く小さな機能単位を計画し、ひな形作成、生成と評価の反復、レビューと承認を経て動く最小限の製品を組み立てるスキル。

• 設計書から動くMVPを作りたいとき
• 一連の処理が動く小さな機能単位の計画
• 最初に動く機能のひな形作成

まだ存在しない機能の追加を、調査・計画からテスト先行の実装、レビュー、コミットまで進めるスキル。工程を担当エージェントに分担し、計画とコミット前に承認を挟みます。

• 未実装の機能を追加したいとき
• テスト先行で新機能を実装
• 認証機能のセキュリティレビュー

米国の医療ソフトウェアでHIPAAへの対応を検討する際に、患者情報の扱い、外部サービスへの送信条件、必要最小限のアクセスと監査記録を確認するスキル。

• AI診療要約のHIPAA対応を確認したいとき
• 患者情報の分析基盤への送信を検討したいとき
• 必要最小限のアクセスと監査記録の設計

Webサイトや画像・PDFなどのファイルをhere.nowに公開し、共有用URLを取得します。非公開の資料はクラウドのDrivesに保存し、範囲と期限を指定して共有できます。

• Webサイトを公開してURLを得たいとき
• 画像・PDF・動画・音声の共有
• 非公開メモやエージェント用資料の保存

When to delegate to `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit) or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of working inline or using `Explore`. Their output is compressed, so main context lasts longer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish static HTML pages and asset folders to the Paperclip S3/CloudFront page host. Use when asked to deploy, host, or share a persistent page, viewer, prototype, report, or static site without here.now.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce low-fidelity black-and-white UI wireframes as SVGs or viewer pages. Use when asked to wireframe, sketch a screen, draft a layout, make a low-fi mockup, or publish wireframes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A municipal urban-tree-canopy policy proposal — the public need, the evidence, the options, and the funding decision. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for city council, agency reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A field-biology capstone on urban pollinator decline — the survey design, the data, the contribution, and the caveats. Built as a decision-grade coursework defense deck for faculty reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage and resolve GitHub PR review comments one by one, interactively. Use when the user asks to handle, address, respond to, or resolve PR review comments, or mentions reviewer feedback on a pull request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure async-path backend code that could block the asyncio event loop is protected by a teeth-verified runtime anchor in tests/blocking_io/. Use when changing backend Python under app/, packages/harness/deerflow/, or scripts/, when running a blocking-IO triage round over the whole repo, or when a reviewer/CI asks for blocking-IO coverage. Runs a deterministic scan (changed-lines or full-repo), routes each candidate, drafts/extends an anchor, and proves it fails when the blocking IO regresses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews DeerFlow skill packages for readiness, triggers, safety boundaries, resources, and evidence. Invoke when users ask to audit, grade, or production-check an existing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run `@metaharness/darwin evolve {repo}` to mutate a harness's seven policy surfaces (planner/contextBuilder/reviewer/retryPolicy/toolPolicy/memoryPolicy/scorePolicy), sandbox-score each variant, and promote only measured wins. The model is frozen; the harness evolves. Closes the loop ADR-150 opens (score+genome describe; evolve changes). Degrades gracefully when @metaharness/darwin is absent (ADR-150 + ADR-153 architectural constraints).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full PR lifecycle in a fresh task-owned git worktree: implement via the ulw-loop skill with mandatory evidence-bound manual QA → reviewer-readable English PR → verification loop (CI + Cubic, where Cubic is skipped only when its quota is exhausted) → merge by default → worktree cleanup. Decomposes one task into the smallest atomic, independently-mergeable PRs and builds the independent ones concurrently via one worktree per PR driven by parallel subagents or a team. Unbounded loop: any failing gate sends you back to fix-and-re-QA inside that PR's worktree. Use whenever implementation work needs to land as a PR. Triggers: 'create a PR', 'implement and PR', 'work on this and make a PR', 'implement issue', 'land this as a PR', 'split into atomic PRs', 'parallel PRs', 'work-with-pr', 'PR workflow', 'implement end to end', even when user just says 'implement X' if the context implies PR delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The shared Claude Docs viewer — an artifact TYPE. An artifact made from it is a doc: a live document that people and Claude read and edit together (people may also call it a page). The doc's content does not live in this artifact's files at all — it lives in the Claude Docs service and is read and written ONLY through the Claude Docs connector (its create, batch, read and update tools). Read this before touching such an artifact: it says what the files are, that an instance owns none of its own, how to change what the doc says (the connector, never a publish), and where a comment on the doc — including one sent to you from it — is read and answered (the connector's comment verbs; never these files, never the artifact's comment relay).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate an Agent Skill package and choose the right instruction, capability, or lifecycle primitive before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a skill-requested filesystem, command, network, secret, or destructive action against an explicit sandbox policy without executing it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

House-style oversized macOS cursor technique for HyperFrames launch videos. Load whenever a scene involves cursors or a pointer-led action, when kicking off a UI scene, when igniting a morph/transition/typing run with a click, or when a scene reads as static, dead, or stale and needs a cheap high-yield source of motion to carry the viewer's eye and segment them out of the stale state. Covers cursor size/look (incl. brand-motif cursors), the off-screen entry law, tip-targeting and the click tap, click-ignites-the-next-beat, and exit / cross-scene handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。