「vulnerability」の検索結果

Implementing multi-layer security scanning (container, SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets), SBOM generation, and risk-based vulnerability prioritization in CI/CD pipelines. Use when building DevSecOps workflows, ensuring compliance, or establishing security gates for container deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic Docker and container image guidance for Java projects - Dockerfile design, multi-stage Maven builds, jlink custom runtimes, micro runtime distributions such as Alpaquita, JVM container ergonomics, non-root execution, image metadata, .dockerignore, reproducible builds, vulnerability scanning, SBOM awareness, and production-safe container defaults. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java Dockerfile; Improve Docker image security; Add jlink runtime to a Java container; Add containerization to a Java project; Optimize Java container image size; Review Docker build reproducibility. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise software products, AI-enabled products, RAG assistants, AI agents, generated instructions, related services, automated updates, vulnerability handling, corrective updates, warnings, instructions, or product-safety evidence under Directive (EU) 2024/2853, the EU Product Liability Directive. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise products, services, libraries, agents, plugins, connected components, or platform modules that may qualify as products with digital elements and need EU Cyber Resilience Act secure-by-design, vulnerability handling, security update, SBOM, product documentation, or release-readiness controls. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit CVE/vulnerability source coverage for a technology stack. Maps each component (container, library, base image, runtime) to authoritative CVE feeds, flags gaps, and produces audit-ready reports. Generic: works for any service or stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security auditing and vulnerability assessment specialist. Use when conducting security reviews, analyzing code for vulnerabilities, performing OWASP assessments, or creating security audit reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform black-box / grey-box web application penetration testing on an authorized target — auth bypass, IDOR, session handling, business-logic flaws, parameter tampering, Burp Suite / OWASP ZAP workflows. Use when the user mentions 'web pentest,' 'web application penetration test,' 'pentesting,' 'bug bounty,' 'Burp Suite,' 'ZAP,' 'OWASP testing,' 'authentication testing,' 'session testing,' 'authorization testing,' 'business logic testing,' 'web vulnerability testing,' or has explicit authorization to test a live web application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit project dependencies, frameworks, languages, and dev tools for known vulnerabilities, CVEs, and security anti-patterns. Use when the user mentions 'dependency audit,' 'npm audit,' 'CVE,' 'vulnerable packages,' 'supply chain security,' 'outdated dependencies,' 'known vulnerabilities,' 'security advisory,' 'package security,' 'framework vulnerability,' 'is this package safe,' or needs to check whether their stack has known security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a single security finding — from a scanner, audit, advisory, or report — to a defensible disposition with a mitigation plan, false-positive justification, or accepted-risk writeup. Use when the user mentions 'triage this finding,' 'is this a real vulnerability,' 'mitigation plan,' 'false positive,' 'accept this risk,' 'compensating controls,' 'risk justification,' 'security ticket,' 'CVSS this,' 'should we fix this,' 'disposition,' 'sign off on,' or has a single security finding and needs to decide what to do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and interpret security-research diffs between Windows versions or patch levels using this repo's WinDiff CLI and databases. Use when comparing Windows builds or binaries such as ntoskrnl.exe, ntdll.dll, win32k*.sys, ci.dll, or cng.sys to find changed syscalls, symbols, types, mitigation flags, callbacks, ETW/EtwTi telemetry, code-integrity behavior, drivers, or attack surface. Explain likely intent and security relevance with Windows-internals knowledge, and frame findings for anti-malware/EDR, anti-cheat, and vulnerability-research audiences rather than returning an uninterpreted symbol list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing source code for vulnerabilities — drive CodeQL/Semgrep/Joern to taint untrusted data source-to-sink across injection, memory safety, deserialization/prototype-pollution, secrets/crypto/authz/race, and supply-chain risks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs a security assessment — threat modeling, vulnerability review, auth flow audit, dependency scanning, or says "is this secure", "review for vulnerabilities", "threat model", "security audit", "pen test prep".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits dependency supply chains for bad versions, lockfile drift, and artifact integrity. Use when adding deps, handling incidents, or releasing a plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vulnerability-research loop toward a novel CVE. Target triage -> attack-surface map -> ranked hypotheses -> investigate (RE / fuzz / audit) -> a finding deepens the loop, a dead-end pivots to a new approach. Uses the full wiki + hunt skillset. Scaffolds and persists state under raw/research/<project>/. Triggers - "research", "find a cve", "analyze this binary/library", "audit this code for vulns".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

检查文稿里的 AI 味和账号语气偏差，包括机器化表达、翻译腔、虚构脆弱感和过度金句。用户问文案是否像 AI 写的、是否像本人说话，或希望降低 AI 痕迹时使用。 English: Check drafts for AI-writing signals and voice mismatch, including robotic phrasing, translation-like prose, fabricated vulnerability, and forced quotable lines. Use when the user wants the copy to sound more human or more like the target account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous AI code generation safety guardrail register: static AST analysis, forbidden import filters, and zero-day vulnerability checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 伪弱势反转｜困境诱近—准备微证据—能力破局—继续上路 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically analyze code to detect security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks (SQL, command, XSS), insecure deserialization, improper authentication, hard-coded credentials, and unsafe cryptography. Use when: (1) Performing security code review, (2) Analyzing code for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, (3) Identifying CWE-classified weaknesses, (4) Generating security audit reports, (5) Reviewing code before deployment, or (6) Assessing third-party code security. Findings categorized by CWE ID and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze CVE reachability in software repositories by examining how vulnerable dependencies are imported and used. Determines whether vulnerable components, classes, or functions are reachable from project code through call chain analysis, reflection detection, dynamic loading patterns, and configuration-gated behavior. Classifies each CVE as likely reachable, possibly reachable, or likely unreachable with supporting evidence. Use when analyzing security vulnerabilities in dependencies, performing post-disclosure CVE triage, assessing vulnerability impact, or when users ask to analyze CVE reachability, check if vulnerabilities are exploitable, or evaluate dependency security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated security scanning for dependencies, code, containers with Trivy, Snyk, npm audit. Use for CI/CD security gates, pre-deployment audits, compliance requirements, or encountering CVE detection, outdated packages, license compliance, SBOM generation errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when publishing, open-sourcing, exporting, sanitizing, or moving code, agent skills, prompts, templates, fixtures, datasets, workshop assets, or other artifacts from a private repository, vendor/runtime environment, or mixed working directory into a public repository or registry. Builds a provenance inventory, license/security review, explicit allowlist, clean staging package, approval dry run, and fresh public clone/install smoke. Triggers on "open source this", "publish these skills", "make this repo public", "export and sanitize", "подготовь публичный релиз", "выложи скиллы", "опенсорсни", "санитизируй и опубликуй". NOT for ordinary upstream bugfix PRs, vulnerability disclosure, or creating a corp-* department.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。