4,004 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when building trading systems, backtesting strategies, implementing execution algorithms, or analyzing market microstructure - covers strategy development, risk management, and production deploymentUse when ", " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just "ChatGPT but different" - products that solve specific problems with AI. Covers prompt engineering for products, cost management, rate limiting, and building defensible AI businesses. Use when "AI wrapper, GPT product, AI tool, wrap AI, AI SaaS, Claude API product, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert patterns for AI-powered image editing including inpainting, outpainting, ControlNet, image-to-image, and API integration with Replicate, Stability AI, and FalUse when "ai image editing, inpainting, outpainting, controlnet, image to image, remove object from image, extend image, flux inpaint, sdxl editing, image-editing, inpainting, outpainting, controlnet, stable-diffusion, flux, replicate, stability-ai, comfyui" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The fusion of trend prediction and AI content generation: detecting emerging trends before they peak and generating content that rides—or creates—the wave. This is marketing alchemy, transmuting data signals into viral gold. Traditional trend marketing is reactive: see trend, create content, hope you're not too late. AI Trend Alchemy is predictive: detect signal, generate content, be there as the wave crests. The combination of AI trend detection and AI content generation creates a feedback loop that can outpace human competition. This skill combines data science intuition with creative generation, reading the digital tea leaves while simultaneously conjuring the content that captures the moment. It's part analyst, part creator, part prophet. Use when "trend, trending, viral, predict, emerging, what's next, cultural moment, before it peaks, early signal, catch the wave, trend prediction, going viral, trend, prediction, viral, cultural, emerging, timing, alchemy, detection" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mastery of the new frontier: AI-generated video that rivals—and reimagines—traditional production. This skill covers Veo3, Runway Gen-3, Sora, Kling, Pika, Luma Dream Machine, and the rapidly evolving landscape of neural video synthesis. We're not just using AI to replace traditional video—we're unlocking visuals that were previously impossible, unaffordable, or unimaginable. Flying through abstract data visualizations, impossible camera moves, photorealistic product renders from text, and consistent character performances without actors or sets. The practitioners of this skill understand that AI video is not about cost savings— it's about creative expansion. The ceiling has been removed. What would you create if production cost was zero and physics was optional? Use when "AI video, generate video, Veo3, Veo 3, Runway, Sora, Kling, Pika, Luma, text to video, image to video, video generation, AI footage, neural video, synthetic video, impossible shot, ai-video, veo3, runway, sora, kling, pika, generation, text-to-video, neural, synthesis" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The enhancement layer for AI-generated content. This skill covers AI-powered visual effects, compositing, upscaling, restoration, and post-production magic—turning raw AI output into polished, professional content. AI generation gets you 80% of the way. Visual effects get you the remaining 20% that separates "clearly AI" from "how did they do that?" This skill covers ComfyUI workflows, Runway's AI tools, intelligent upscaling, rotoscoping, color grading, and the integration of AI elements into traditional footage. The practitioners of this skill are technical artists who understand both traditional VFX workflows and the new AI-native approaches that are revolutionizing post-production. Use when "AI visual effects, VFX, upscale, upscaling, composite, rotoscope, background removal, color grade, inpaint, outpaint, style transfer, enhance, ComfyUI, post-production AI, vfx, visual-effects, compositing, upscaling, post-production, comfyui, enhancement, color-grading" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in building 3D experiences for the web - Three.js, React Three Fiber, Spline, WebGL, and interactive 3D scenes. Covers product configurators, 3D portfolios, immersive websites, and bringing depth to web experiences. Use when "3D website, three.js, WebGL, react three fiber, 3D experience, spline, product configurator, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The ultimate brand asset: a consistent, explorable universe generated by AI. This skill covers creating coherent brand worlds, consistent characters, architectural spaces, and visual universes that serve as the foundation for all marketing content. Traditional brand building creates guidelines. AI world building creates explorable realities. Characters with consistent personalities across thousands of images. Environments that feel like real places. Visual languages so coherent that any new asset feels like it belongs. This is where AI generation meets universe design. The practitioners of this skill don't just create images—they create the DNA that generates infinite consistent images. They build the source code for visual worlds. Use when "world building, brand world, universe, consistent character, character design, visual language, brand universe, style bible, world bible, coherent assets, character sheet, environment design, world-building, universe, character-design, consistency, visual-language, brand-world, style-guide" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The systematic orchestration of AI-powered marketing workflows that combine content generation, approval processes, multi-channel distribution, and quality gates into cohesive automation systems. This skill integrates AI generation tools (Jasper, Claude, GPT) with automation platforms (Zapier, Make, n8n) and marketing systems to build scalable content pipelines. It focuses on maintaining brand consistency, implementing rigorous quality gates, and balancing automation with strategic human oversight. Key capabilities include designing parallel approval flows, monitoring costs, and architecting "invisible" automation that enhances productivity without sacrificing quality.Use when "AI workflow, automate content, content automation, workflow automation, AI pipeline, automated marketing, content distribution automation, approval workflow, scale content production, AI orchestration, automation, workflow, ai-orchestration, content-pipeline, approval-workflow, multi-channel, quality-gates, cost-control" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify true SEO competitors and quantify the gap, powered by the DataForSEO Labs API. Returns the top 10 competing domains by SERP overlap, with shared and unique keywords, traffic estimates, and a Competitive Score (0-100) showing how dominant the target is in its category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Catches shortcuts and reward hacking — weakening or deleting tests to make them pass, hard-coding expected outputs, silently dropping requirements, or claiming work is done without running it. Use before declaring a task complete and whenever a test or requirement feels like it's in the way.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
数据工程 — 数据平台从业者的认知操作系统, 覆盖把数据从源系统搬运成可靠 / 可查询 / 可信赖形态供分析 / ML / 数据产品消费的全生命周期 (生成 → 摄取 → 存储 → 转换 → 服务 + 安全/数据管理/DataOps/数据架构/编排/软件工程 六条暗流, Reis & Housley 框架): 摄取与集成 (批 + CDC 变更数据捕获 Debezium + EL 工具 Fivetran/Airbyte/Meltano/dlt + Kafka Connect + schema drift) / 存储与文件表格式 (对象存储数据湖 + 列存 Parquet/ORC/Arrow/Avro + 开放表格式 Apache Iceberg/Delta Lake/Apache Hudi + lakehouse + 分区/compaction) / 转换与建模 (ELT dbt/SQLMesh + Spark + 维度建模 Kimball + Inmon + Data Vault + 大宽表 OBT + 渐变维 SCD + 增量模型 + 语义/指标层) / 编排与工作流 (Apache Airflow/Dagster/Prefect/Mage/Kestra/Apache DolphinScheduler + DAG + 幂等 + 回填 backfill + 数据资产调度) / 批流与实时 (Apache Kafka/Apache Flink/Spark Structured Streaming/Kinesis/Pulsar/Redpanda + Lambda vs Kappa + watermark/窗口/exactly-once + 流式 SQL Materialize/RisingWave + 实时 OLAP ClickHouse/Apache Druid/Apache Pinot/StarRocks/Apache Doris) / 数仓与查询引擎 (Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift/Databricks SQL/Trino/Presto/DuckDB/Polars + 存算分离 + MPP) / 数据质量测试与可观测性 (dbt tests/Great Expectations/Soda + 数据契约 + Monte Carlo data downtime + 新鲜度/量/schema 异常检测) / 数据治理编目与血缘 (DataHub/Amundsen/OpenMetadata/Unity Catalog + 列级血缘 + PII 分类 + 访问控制 + GDPR) / DataOps 与可靠性 (数据 CI/CD + 转换版本控制 + 环境隔离 + 幂等重处理 + 数据 SLA/SLO + 计算存储 FinOps) / 数据架构范式 (现代数据栈 + lakehouse + data mesh + data fabric + 去中心化 vs 中心化所有权) / 分析工程角色 (dbt 时代连接数据工程与分析的桥) — 不含 数据科学/ML 建模本身 (是下游消费者) / BI 仪表盘制作 (serving 下游) / 数据分析报表为终点 / 'data engineer = 跑 Hadoop 的' 过时窄化 / 通用后端应用开发 (平行学科) (Data Engineering — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design, build, and operate the data platform: moving data from source systems into reliable, queryable, trustworthy form for analytics / ML / products, covering (a) the data engineering lifecycle (generation → ingestion → storage → transformation → serving, with the undercurrents security / data management / DataOps / data architecture / orchestration / software engineering — Reis & Housley framing), (b) ingestion & integration (batch + CDC change-data-capture with Debezium, EL tools Fivetran / Airbyte / Meltano / dlt, Kafka Connect, API + file + database sources, schema drift handling), (c) storage & file/table formats (object storage data lakes, columnar formats Parquet / ORC / Arrow / Avro, open table formats Apache Iceberg / Delta Lake / Apache Hudi, lakehouse architecture, partitioning / compaction / Z-ordering), (d) transformation & modeling (ELT with dbt / SQLMesh, Spark, dimensional modeling Kimball, Inmon CIF, Data Vault, One Big Table / wide tables, normalization vs denormalization, slowly changing dimensions, incremental models, the semantic / metrics layer), (e) orchestration & workflow (Apache Airflow, Dagster, Prefect, Mage, Kestra, Apache DolphinScheduler, DAGs, idempotency, backfills, data-aware / asset-based scheduling), (f) batch vs streaming & real-time (Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, Kinesis / Pulsar / Redpanda, the Lambda vs Kappa debate, watermarks / windowing / exactly-once, streaming SQL Materialize / RisingWave, real-time OLAP ClickHouse / Apache Druid / Apache Pinot / StarRocks / Apache Doris), (g) warehouses & query engines (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks SQL, Trino / Presto, DuckDB, Polars, decoupled storage & compute, MPP), (h) data quality, testing & observability (dbt tests, Great Expectations, Soda, data contracts, Monte Carlo / data downtime, freshness / volume / schema anomaly detection, unit / integration testing of pipelines), (i) data governance, catalog & lineage (DataHub, Amundsen, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog, column-level lineage, PII / data classification, access control, GDPR / data privacy), (j) DataOps & reliability (CI/CD for data, version control of transformations, environments, idempotent reprocessing, SLAs / SLOs for data, cost / FinOps for compute & storage), (k) data architecture paradigms (modern data stack, data lakehouse, data mesh, data fabric, decentralized vs centralized ownership), (l) the analytics engineering role (the dbt-era bridge between data engineering and analysis); N
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate navigable semantic maps from PDF documents. Extracts section structure via font analysis, then runs LLM extraction per section for claims, symbols, and dependencies — all page-anchored. Produces _MAP.md (progressive disclosure), .symbols.json (definition index), .anchors.json (claim references), and a _USAGE.md snippet for CLAUDE.md. Use when analyzing papers, specs, or legal docs; when asked to "map this document", "index this PDF", "what does this paper say"; or when a coding agent needs grounded reference material from a PDF source. Analogous to tree-sitting but for prose documents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semantic Python code queries via a stdio LSP client driving pyright-langserver. Provides binding-resolved go-to-definition, find-references, hover types, type diagnostics, file symbol outlines, and project-wide symbol search — name resolution and type inference that tree-sitter and ripgrep cannot do. Use when you need to follow an import to a definition, find all real uses of a symbol (excluding same-named-but-unrelated ones), get an inferred type, surface type errors, outline a file, or search symbols across a project. Triggers on "go to definition", "find references", "what type is", "resolve this symbol", "symbol outline", "find symbol in project", "pyright", "type-check this file".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binding-resolved Python symbol queries via pyright — every true caller (--refs), the real definition (--def), or an inferred signature (--hover) of a .py symbol, excluding the same-named false positives text search cannot tell apart. Use when a task needs ALL callers or users of a named Python symbol and grep would over-match. Python only, and only for the caller/definition question: measured 2026-07-04 on real issue-localization tasks, plain ripgrep tied or beat the semantic and indexed-regex tiers at 4-60x less wall-clock, so those tiers survive below without being a default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。