3,001 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Proactive bug-hunting workflow. Assesses codebase risk through complexity, coverage, and structural analysis, then spawns focused investigators that write reproducing tests to validate suspected bugs. Thoroughness over speed. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Abductive reasoning about causes. Takes a phenomenon, separates observations from interpretations, then spawns diagnosticians applying different reasoning lenses (technical, human-factors, process, incentive-structure, environmental, temporal, measurement-artifact, statistical) in isolation. Orchestrator evaluates candidate causes for fit-against-evidence, calibrates confidence honestly, and reports leading candidate(s) with distinguishing evidence needed. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Accessibility audit. Dispatches an accessibility auditor to identify WCAG conformance gaps, prioritize by user impact, and recommend fixes. Advisory only — no changes made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Good-faith divergent brainstorming for achieving a goal. Validates assumptions, then spawns brainstormers running different techniques (first-principles, working-backwards, lateral, analogical, constraints-shift, etc.) in isolation, and synthesizes the pool into a report of standouts, reasonable ideas, and hybrid combinations. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analysis of Competing Hypotheses. Operationalizes Richards Heuer's CIA-tradition technique for systematically narrowing among multiple hypotheses against evidence. Builds an explicit hypothesis-vs-evidence matrix and focuses on disconfirmation rather than confirmation — the central insight: hypotheses cannot be proven, only disconfirmed; the surviving hypothesis is the one with the least disconfirming evidence. Spawns parallel hypothesizers (in isolation, across hypothesis-generation angles) and parallel evidence-gatherers (across evidence classes), then synthesizes into a matrix, diagnosticity analysis, sensitivity analysis, and falsification milestones. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive test suite review across five phases. Surveys unit coverage, integration coverage, E2E (browser) coverage for webapps, fuzz coverage, and test quality — in that order. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement test changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance review. Detects project type and dispatches compute and/or web performance reviewers. Advisory only — no changes made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural review workflow. Analyzes codebase organization via noun analysis and produces a target blueprint. Advisory only — does not implement changes. Always offers to cut tickets for the planned work; orchestrators receive the proposal and apply their own autonomy judgment to approve / edit / decline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-pass strategic-orientation review of a repository. Produces an evidence-cited map (not a grade) calibrated to a reference class, helping the user decide where to engage, where to tread carefully, and where to leave alone. Advisory only — no changes made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Switch from Docker to Apple Container for macOS-native container isolation. Use when the user wants Apple Container instead of Docker, or is setting up on macOS and prefers the native runtime. Triggers on "apple container", "convert to apple container", "switch to apple container", or "use apple container".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when improving a Coworld player through one diagnosed failure and completed comparison evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuild the cqs index and show before/after stats comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-first revenue, pricing, refunds, team-billing, and billing-model truth workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a sales snapshot, pricing comparison, duplicate-charge diagnosis, or code-backed billing reality instead of generic payments advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
C++ coding standards based on the C++ Core Guidelines (isocpp.github.io). Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring C++ code to enforce modern, safe, and idiomatic practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate multi-agent coding tasks via Claude DevFleet — plan projects, dispatch parallel agents in isolated worktrees, monitor progress, and read structured reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AI-first interfaces that build ongoing relationships through memory, trust evolution, and collaborative planning, not just isolated screen interactions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop an independent visual language and turn the human-chosen direction into a production-ready graphic, brand, campaign, publication, web, or product system. Use when originality and differentiation matter enough to escape generic AI and Big Tech aesthetics. Guides a minimum-evidence start, ten isolated typography-led HTML design directions made only from type, color, and space, visual-first human judgement, explicit commitment, and concrete Round 2 production. Do not use for routine UI fixes, small components, or applying an existing design system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your AI compliance officer. Guides startups and scale-ups through SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS — from zero to audit-ready. No consultants needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured multi-criteria decision analysis for ranking options with weights, constraints, confidence, tradeoff reasoning, sensitivity analysis, and explainable recommendations. Use when the user asks for decision support, MCDA, weighted scoring, prioritization, vendor selection, route planning, hiring shortlist ranking, tool comparison, procurement decisions, or auditable agent decision logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate non-binding follow-up action suggestions from lead summaries or lead lists. Use when users ask for next best actions, call list for hot leads, or follow-up draft plan without automatic execution. Recommended chain: summary-generator then action-suggester then supervisor approval. Do not use for parsing, storage, or autonomous action execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。