Guides using eRPC (electron-tRPC) for inter-process communication (IPC) between Electron main and renderer processes. Triggered when handling Electron IPC or tRPC-based systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5,031 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides using eRPC (electron-tRPC) for inter-process communication (IPC) between Electron main and renderer processes. Triggered when handling Electron IPC or tRPC-based systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain package-level `agentmap.md` files as outline-level maps of the real file tree and core responsibilities. Use when package structure or responsibility boundaries change and the corresponding `agentmap.md` must be created or updated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find web sources with query-relevant page excerpts and optional full-page content, and discover workflows, data APIs, and indexes. Use for web research or finding structured records, listings, transcripts, and datasets. Supports semantic tool discovery, domain matching, and progressive catalogue browsing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and maintain a Karpathy-style LLM knowledge base — a self-compiling Obsidian markdown wiki where an Agent ingests raw sources, compiles cross-linked concept/entity/summary pages, answers queries against the corpus, lints the graph for health, and audits in-context human feedback filed from Obsidian or the local web viewer. Use when (1) scaffolding a new knowledge base for any research topic, (2) ingesting articles/papers/PDFs/web pages into raw/, (3) compiling or restructuring wiki articles from existing raw material, (4) answering questions against the wiki and filing durable answers back, (5) running lint passes for dead links / orphan pages / coverage gaps / audit shape, (6) processing human feedback from the audit/ directory and applying corrections. Not for general note-taking, daily journals, or non-wiki Obsidian use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding Firebase to a Flutter project, running flutterfire configure, initializing Firebase in main.dart, or configuring multiple flavors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monthly, and on its first run it is the whole setup, launched by hand. It discovers what the member actually runs by walking their code roots and reading the registrar, the host, and the hosted database, then writes the inventory, the domains file, the starting budgets, and the opening safe fix rules, seeds the board, builds the dashboard, and registers one scheduled job per routine. It creates no account, buys nothing, and provisions nothing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "organize the project rules", "clean up scattered documentation", "把规则迁移到 skills 目录", "优化 skill 路由", "提高 description 命中率", or "减少薄壳重复维护". Activate when a SKILL.md is too large, rules are duplicated across agent entry files, task routing or trigger_examples miss natural user language, or templates / thin shells / validation scripts need drift-resistant maintenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design mandates for acceptance tests - hexagonal boundary, business language abstraction, user journey completeness, pure function extraction, 3 Pillars (domain language / chained narrative / production composition), and the layered ATD discipline (Universe-bound assertion, layer-dependent PBT mode, two-tier acceptance, example-based sad paths)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Definition of Ready checklist criteria, antipattern detection patterns, UAT quality rules, and domain language enforcement for product owner review
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic and tactical DDD patterns, bounded context discovery, context mapping, aggregate design rules, and decision frameworks for when to apply DDD
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast-forwards through remaining waves end-to-end without stopping for review between waves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Domain-specific authoritative source databases, search strategies by topic category, and source freshness rules
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Acceptance test creation methodology for the DISTILL wave. Domain knowledge for the acceptance designer agent: port-to-port principle, prior wave reading, wave-decision reconciliation, graceful degradation, and document back-propagation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs system architecture with C4 diagrams and technology selection. Routes to the right architect based on design scope (system, domain, application, or full stack). Two interaction modes: guide (collaborative Q&A) or propose (architect presents options with trade-offs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Strategic DDD — bounded context discovery, context mapping patterns, subdomain classification, ubiquitous language, and organizational alignment
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compose and Compose Multiplatform expert for UI development across Android, Desktop, iOS, and Web. Use whenever the user mentions Compose APIs (@Composable, remember, LaunchedEffect, NavHost, MaterialTheme, LazyColumn, Modifier, recomposition), Compose Multiplatform (commonMain, expect/actual, Res.*, ComposeUIViewController, UIKitView, ComposeViewport), Android TV (tv-material, D-pad, focus, Carousel), Material 3 motion, atomic design systems, design-to-code workflows, Paging 3, or navigation. Activates Review Mode on GitHub PR URLs and review phrases ("review this PR", "what's wrong with this"). Auto-detects Compose projects on session_start. Backed by actual androidx/androidx and JetBrains/compose-multiplatform-core source receipts. See "## When this skill applies" in SKILL.md for the full trigger surface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure repository-local tracker, triage, and domain-document conventions needed by the Matt Pocock engineering skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain a clear intake summary and support help, details and summary requests without asserting legal conclusions. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan changes to this repository using its domain CLI, MCP boundaries, and harness validation evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean-code engineering standards for writing, refactoring, and reviewing code in any programming language. Use this whenever the user asks to write clean code, follow clean-code principles, refactor for clarity, improve naming, reduce complexity or duplication, separate concerns, tighten error handling, work test-first or do TDD, or otherwise raise code quality, readability, and maintainability. Also use when writing or reviewing Operately APIs or Ecto queries. Apply these rules by default when producing or changing code for a quality-conscious user.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain Operately translations when adding or changing user-visible copy, fixing missing translations, or adding a supported language. Covers shared Gettext/i18next catalogs, glossaries, generation, and completeness checks; excludes translating user-authored content or general prose outside the product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。