「pipeline」の検索結果

Embed security into DevOps — pipeline security gates, guardrails, and culture that ships fast and safe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design annotation pipelines that produce reliable training labels — guidelines, agreement measurement, and quality control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics engineering with dbt — models, tests, and modular SQL pipelines — use when building or maintaining dbt projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage CRM systems — data architecture, pipeline design, automation, user adoption, and reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Cohere's enterprise AI — Command models, Embed embeddings, and Rerank for retrieval pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CircleCI guidance — config design, orbs, caching, workflows, contexts, and pipeline optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build multimodal AI apps on Clarifai — model marketplace, pipelines, and computer vision plus language workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end bioinformatics analysis — sequence QC, alignment, and omics pipelines for research data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build LLM applications with chain-style orchestration frameworks — prompts, chains, tool-calling agents, memory, and retrieval pipelines. Use when structuring multi-step LLM programs, adding tools to a model, or composing RAG systems in code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build data-centric LLM applications with indexing and retrieval frameworks — document ingestion, indices, query engines, and RAG pipelines. Use when the core problem is getting the right data in front of the model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master orchestrator for B2B SaaS content creation and the editorial production system behind it. Use this skill to produce blog articles, whitepapers, case studies, video scripts, newsletters and ghostwritten thought leadership, to develop content strategy, and to run the publishing line itself — content briefs, editorial calendars and production capacity, review and approval workflow, subject-matter-expert access, the style guide, an AI-drafting policy, and a content inventory with owners. Also triggers on: blog, article, case study, whitepaper, newsletter, video script, ghostwriting, content calendar, editorial, thought leadership, content strategy, content brief, content operations, content ops, editorial workflow, managing editor, who reviews this, our content pipeline is stuck, content is stuck in review, content audit, content inventory, content governance, style guide, house style, SME interview, expert interview, freelance writers, AI content policy, how much content can we actually produce. Also owns the customer academy and customer education: online courses, onboarding curriculum, tutorials, certification programs, digital credentials and badges, exam and pass-mark design, course freshness when the product UI changes, and whether the academy should sit behind a login. Triggers on: customer academy, customer education, online course, course library, learning path, curriculum, tutorial, certification program, certified users, digital badge, Open Badges, recertification, exam, pass mark, LMS, Skilljar, our tutorial shows the old UI, our course is out of date, should the academy be gated, do certified customers renew better.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Account-based marketing for B2B SaaS. Use this skill to build a target account list, tier it 1:1 / 1:few / 1:many, size it against sales capacity, turn intent and engagement signals into plays, write the multi-channel orchestration contract each tier runs on, and measure the program in account coverage, penetration and pipeline instead of MQLs. Also triggers on: ABM, account-based marketing, target account list, TAL, named accounts, account tiering, 1:1 ABM, one-to-few, programmatic ABM, account selection, ideal customer profile fit, intent data, buying signals, 6sense, Bombora, Demandbase, account penetration, account coverage, sales and marketing alignment on accounts, enterprise account program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Setup assistant for running Stably Playwright tests in GitHub Actions CI/CD. Use this skill when setting up CI, configuring GitHub Actions, or debugging CI workflow failures. Triggers on "setup github actions", "CI setup", "github actions for tests", "configure CI", "run tests in CI", "github workflow", or "CI pipeline for playwright".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step guide for building Web Audio processing pipelines — AudioWorklet processors, custom nodes, parameter automation, and WebMIDI integration. Use when the user asks how to build or wire up Web Audio code from scratch. Trigger on phrases like "build an AudioWorklet", "create a custom Web Audio effect", "how do I use WebMIDI", "how do I write an AudioWorkletProcessor", or "how do I connect AudioNodes".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before designing, training, or auditing ANY model that replicates human-annotated labels, audit the annotation protocol's INPUT — the exact document/evidence the human labelers consulted — and give the model that same input. Use when: (1) designing a classifier/LLM extractor whose target is a hand-coded label set, (2) a label-replication model shows low recall concentrated in a label subset and the diagnosis on offer is "the label's information is not in the features", (3) reviewers propose construct splits (e.g. "designation vs record-evident"), adjudication sittings, or per-domain stop rules to explain residual disagreement with gold, (4) validating an extraction pipeline against labels transcribed from a source document. Symptom of the underlying failure: elaborate theory accumulates to explain why gold is "partially unpredictable" when the model was simply never shown the document the annotators read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert between LaTeX and Microsoft Word for academic manuscripts in either direction, and assemble .tex from mixed sources. Fires on: converting .tex/LaTeX to Word/.docx ("tex to docx", "latex to word", "tex2docx", "convert to word", "pandoc convert"); converting .docx manuscripts to LaTeX for editing and back ("convert to latex", "manuscript", "footnotes", "reference doc", the docx-to-tex-to-docx round-trip / academic paper editing pipeline); high-fidelity delivery where plain pandoc loses tables, mangles cross-references, or fails on custom macros — booktabs/regression tables, OMML equations, cleveref, \estauto, \@@input, \thanks, TikZ, native Word tables, longtable, siunitx; and building .tex from mixed PDF/docx/LLM-generated sources. Replaces and reroutes the retired skills manuscript-editing-template-latex, latex-to-docx-fidelity, tex2docx, and latex-from-mixed-sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Markdown (.md) files to a polished PDF with ALL images preserved and scaled to the page. Use whenever the user asks to "save this markdown as a PDF", "convert README.md to pdf", "export the .md as a pdf", "turn these notes/docs into a PDF", or wants a PDF deliverable of any GitHub-flavored Markdown document (README, design doc, report, notes) — especially when it contains images or diagrams (remote or local), tables, code blocks, or a linked table of contents. Pipeline: pandoc (GFM → standalone HTML with embedded resources) → headless Chrome print-to-pdf with a GitHub-like print stylesheet → pypdf verification that every referenced image is embedded. Do NOT use for .tex → PDF (use a LaTeX toolchain) or for .docx work (use word-docx / tex2docx).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Raise real concurrency in asyncio LLM batch scorers built on the OpenAI SDK (AsyncOpenAI, including OpenAI-compatible providers like DeepSeek). Use when: (1) raising an asyncio.Semaphore above ~100 produces no throughput gain, (2) a batch pipeline saturates near 100 in-flight requests despite a larger semaphore, (3) planning a high-concurrency campaign against a provider with no hard rate limit (DeepSeek v4-flash tolerates 2000+ in flight). Root cause: AsyncOpenAI's default httpx pool caps max_connections at 100, silently bottlenecking any larger semaphore — you must pass a custom http_client with httpx.Limits sized to the semaphore.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate resumption of any multi-day LLM batch-scoring campaign that calls an unpinned model alias (deepseek-chat, gpt-*-latest, gemini-*-preview, any provider alias without a pinned version). Use when: (1) resuming a paused or credit-exhausted scoring run days after its last chunk, (2) topping up credits to finish a campaign, (3) extending a cached scoring pipeline with new items. Prevents silently splicing two model versions or serving revisions into one measure. Verified 2026-07-16: for $0.30 caught a serving-revision drift WITHIN DeepSeek v4-flash (same alias, same family, litigation scores systematically shifted across a 2-day gap) before an $83 resume spend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build human adjudication / hand-labeling sheets from LLM-pipeline data without evidence truncation. Use when: (1) preparing a CSV/Excel sheet for a human to rule on cases an LLM classifier or rater panel judged, (2) a labeler reports "there is no information to label from" or cells look empty in Excel, (3) excerpt columns cluster at one exact length (e.g. all 1,500 chars — a hard truncation cap). Covers: full rating-basis recovery, Excel 32,767-char cell cap, multi-line CSV mangling, ruling dropdowns, companion text files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Software Design Document (SDD) defining component architecture, data contracts, API schemas, and platform compatibility before planning. Use in Tier 3 (Full Pipeline) or when modifying interfaces, hooks, databases, or multi-platform contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。