5,927 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write and revise the Methods section of research papers to ensure reproducibility; use when preparing an IMRAD manuscript or responding to journal/reporting-guideline requirements (e.g., CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates academic reviews for molecules in diseases using PubMed research. Invoke when user needs biomedical literature review with Vancouver citation format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing medical school personal statements, residency application essays, fellowship statements, or graduate school admissions essays. Crafts compelling narratives highlighting clinical experiences, research achievements, and career motivations for healthcare education applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when converting medical text between academic and patient-friendly tones, translating medical jargon for patients, adapting research papers for public audiences, or rewriting clinical notes for patient handouts. Maintains medical accuracy while adjusting readability level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates a systematic review and meta-analysis workflow following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, from protocol development through multi-database search, screening, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Use when conducting evidence-based reviews, meta-analyses, or scoping revi...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A multi-stage workflow for writing long-form medical reviews; used when the user needs to build an outline based on PubMed literature, write chapter by chapter, perform supplementary searches, and format citations; input is the review topic and project directory, output is a c...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests f...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates the Methods section for a meta-analysis paper, including search strategy, screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and statistical analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when optimizing LinkedIn profiles for doctors, physicians, nurses, healthcare professionals, or medical researchers. Crafts compelling headlines, writes professional summaries, integrates healthcare keywords, and builds personal branding for medical careers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a first draft of a clinical meta-analysis paper. Input the research report (including Methods and Results sections), language, and title to automatically generate a complete paper draft including Abstract, Introduction, Discussion, and other sections, with automatic ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete Mendelian randomization study designs from a user-provided exposure and outcome direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a Mendelian randomization study — even if phrased as "help me write a paper on X", "design an MR study for Y", or "I want to test whether A causally affects B using GWAS". Covers core two-sample MR design, optional bidirectional follow-up, optional multivariable MR, IV selection logic, ancestry alignment, harmonization, IVW as the default primary estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO / leave-one-out sensitivity analyses, Steiger directionality, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and explicit claim-boundary control. Always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, validation ladder, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete two-sample Mendelian randomization research designs from a user-provided outcome, exposure or exposure family, and robustness direction. Use when a study centers on summary-statistics causal inference with instrument selection, harmonization, IVW-primary estimation, complementary estimators, sensitivity analyses, optional multivariable upgrades, and conservative evidence interpretation. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs QTL colocalization studies that connect eQTL, pQTL, sQTL, or related molecular QTL signals with GWAS loci. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to plan, scope, or structure a locus-level study asking whether a GWAS association and a molecular QTL association may reflect the same underlying causal signal. Covers locus definition, QTL/GWAS source architecture, ancestry and LD alignment, single-locus vs multi-locus strategy, candidate-gene prioritization, optional fine-mapping, linked MR/SMR follow-up, and functional annotation. Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, evidence hierarchy, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references. Never equate colocalization with causality proof, mediation proof, or automatic target validation. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets, repositories, consortia, or public resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for one-drug whole-profile safety mapping using signal detection, subgroup analysis, onset/seriousness characterization, and conservative label-gap interpretation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a structured real-world evidence study using EHR, claims, or registry data, with explicit handling of time zero, eligibility windows, exposure definitions, outcome windows, censoring, confounding control, and target-trial-emulation logic. Use this skill when the user needs study-type design and protocol framing for an observational clinical study based on routine-care data. Do not invent database fields, follow-up completeness, linkage, coding validity, or causal identifiability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs internal, external, temporal, and functional validation strategies at the protocol stage for medical research studies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extends a mechanistic or association-level biomedical finding into a staged validation pathway that moves from descriptive evidence toward stronger functional support, mechanistic specificity, and clinical relevance. Use this skill when a user has a pathway, biomarker, cell-state, target, mechanism, or association finding and needs to decide what should be validated next, in what order, and which evidence layers are necessary versus optional. Do not default to maximal validation stacks. Build a structured validation ladder with a primary route, stronger upgrade route, and optional extensions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete single-compound network-toxicology research designs from one exposure, one disease or toxic phenotype, and a validation direction. Use when a study centers on one compound–one disease link and needs target collection, overlap construction, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-check, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically maps mechanism evidence for a disease from molecules to pathways, cell types, tissues, biological consequences, and clinical phenotypes. Always use this skill when a user needs a layered mechanism evidence chain rather than a flat summary or immediate gap analysis. Formal literature citations must be real and verifiable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies translationally meaningful paths for bioinformatics findings by mapping omics or computational discoveries to diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment-response, monitoring, or target-nomination use cases, while auditing bridge evidence, assayability, and validation burden. Use this skill when a user wants to know whether a bioinformatics finding can be framed as a stronger translational topic without overclaiming clinical relevance. Always separate statistical signal from translational value, and never imply clinical utility, targetability, or validation depth without explicit evidence support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。