「output」の検索結果

Shared Python 3.11+ development rules — type safety and the boundary policy for `Any` (ty, native generics, Protocol, TypeIs, Pydantic), layered architecture and SOLID, error handling, security, performance, identifier naming, PEP 723 script dependencies, Rich/Typer output, tooling defaults (uv, ruff, ty, hatchling, pytest), and testing requirements (behavioral coverage, TDD). Activates when any Python skill or agent needs the shared rules for implementation, code review, refactoring, or test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building CLI applications with Typer and Rich — creating commands with Annotated parameter syntax, defining arguments and options, composing subcommands, async concurrent CLI tasks with semaphores, testing with CliRunner, PEP 723 shebang scripts, progress bars, Rich terminal output, or non-TTY display width handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Python scripts that must run on Windows, Linux, and macOS — especially when Rich or Typer output breaks on Windows, when dealing with Unicode/encoding errors, ANSI escape handling, terminal detection, path separators, or console color support. Provides verified cross-platform patterns covering stdout/stderr encoding guards, Windows console quirks, terminal capability detection, and portable I/O for CLI, TUI (Rich/Textual), and GUI environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain. Use for failing test names or pytest output, distinguishing product, interface, oracle, and harness defects without automatically changing expectations or forcing an architectural redesign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building CLI applications with Typer — creating commands, defining arguments and options with enum restrictions, path validation, date and UUID types, composing subcommands, testing with CliRunner, or using advanced features like colored output, progress bars, shell autocompletion, and version callbacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis criteria, transformation patterns, output format, and validation checklist for refactoring Claude Code agent prompt files. Load this skill when preparing to run the subagent-refactorer agent or when reviewing agent prompt files for structural, model optimization, or instruction quality improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesis step in the multi-angle technical research pipeline. Receives structured outputs from all four research angles (api-state, ecosystem-research, impact-measurement, codebase-auditor), applies cross-angle signal weighting and conflict resolution, and produces a single synthesized Research section. Invoked by the technical-researcher orchestrator after all angle skills complete. Returns content to the orchestrator — does not write to the backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Where a dispatched step puts its output, and how it signals state upstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing failing test cases to determine whether failures indicate genuine bugs or test implementation issues. Activates on "analyze failing tests", "debug test failures", "investigate test errors", or when provided with specific failing test names or output. Applies balanced investigative reasoning — does not auto-fix tests without establishing root cause.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-line definitions of development-harness (dh) plugin terminology — RT-ICA, ARL, SAM, the S1-S7 pipeline stage names, Impact Radius — each with a pointer to its canonical source file. Use when a dh skill, agent, or workflow step references a term without defining it, before guessing what the term means from its observed outputs, or when asked what a dh concept or acronym stands for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when SAM Stage 5 Execution has completed and task results need independent verification against acceptance criteria. Dispatches a separate reviewer agent to fact-check implementation outputs and returns COMPLETE or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings and remediation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes SAM Stage 5 — opens an attempt on a single ARTIFACT:TASK, dispatches it to a fresh stateless agent session, runs quality gates, and records an ARTIFACT:EXECUTION with implementation results and verification output on the task. Use when Stage 4 Task Decomposition is complete and tasks are ready for execution, when re-executing a task after Stage 6 returns NEEDS_WORK, or when dispatching a task to a language-appropriate specialist agent via the development harness pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extracting specific data points from large agent output transcripts, kaizen analysis reports, or JSONL session files — tool timings, query counts, error summaries, or any structured facts — without loading raw data into orchestrator context. Activates when the orchestrator needs targeted facts from large files and context pollution must be avoided.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms validated /linear-walkthrough artifacts into one presentation-ready deck outline per major codebase component. Use when the user asks to create a presentation, prepare a walkthrough deck, build an onboarding deck, produce an architecture review deck, or summarize a codebase for a technical audience. Requires walkthrough directory output -- reads unified walkthrough, per-section files, validation reports, coverage maps, entry points, and open questions -- then orchestrates four parallel agent phases to produce slide outlines with speaker notes, evidence references, and suggested visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, create, run, monitor, and maintain Vapi Simulations for assistants and squads. Use for turning plain-language requirements into a coverage plan, simulation personalities, scenarios, structured-output success criteria, simulations, suites, extending an existing suite, chat or voice runs, tool mocks, target variables, lifecycle webhooks, regression coverage, launch readiness, CI quality gates, run-result analysis, and simulation API validation errors. Do not use for fixed-turn mock-conversation Evals unless the user is deciding between Evals and Simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs publication tables for social-science manuscripts. Covers whether a result belongs in a table at all, column order, row grouping and panels, decimal precision, standard-error and confidence-interval conventions, self-contained titles and notes, and code-generated output. Use when building or revising a regression, balance, descriptive, or robustness table, or when working with modelsummary, stargazer, gt, esttab, or booktabs. Finished tables go to figure-table-audit for end-stage QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger when: (1) User wants to create an educational/explainer video, (2) User has a vague concept they want visualized, (3) User mentions "3b1b style" or "explain like 3Blue1Brown", (4) User wants to plan a Manim video or animation sequence, (5) User asks to "compose" or "plan" a math/science visualization. Transforms vague video ideas into detailed scene-by-scene plans (scenes.md). Conducts research, asks clarifying questions about audience/scope/focus, and outputs comprehensive scene specifications ready for implementation with ManimCE or ManimGL. Use this BEFORE writing any Manim code. This skill plans the video; use manimce-best-practices or manimgl-best-practices for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineering operating model for teams where AI agents generate a large share of implementation output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Snapshot test email templates using Verify to catch regressions. Validates rendered HTML output matches approved baseline. Works with MJML templates and any email renderer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Verify for snapshot testing in .NET. Approve API surfaces, HTTP responses, rendered emails, and serialized outputs. Detect unintended changes through human-reviewed baseline files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。