「evidence」の検索結果

Stress-test a marketing decision using multiple expert lenses and synthesize disagreements into a clear decision with evidence and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan the participation ramp before we promote", "how much account history or karma do we need in this community", or "design entry incentives and member lifecycle for our own Discord"; produces the per-community pre-promotion warming plan — account-history/tenure expectations (Estimated, named sources), a give-before-ask ledger spec, a per-community etiquette + rule digest with last-verified dates, and the warming → active graduation criteria that channel-registry requires as state-transition evidence — plus the owned-community variant (entry paths + member lifecycle for your own Discord/Slack/forum/企业微信私域). Not for launch-day submissions or T-0 threads — use community-launch-runner. 社区预热/先给后取/账号养成/毕业标准

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, analyze and synthesize customer research into pains, jobs, triggers, objections, language, segments and evidence-backed marketing implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize entity presence", reconcile an entity identity, or update canonical Knowledge Graph facts; audits and maintains machine-facing identity, sameAs, schema, disambiguation, and AI-recognition evidence through the entities registry. Not for page-level AI-citation readiness - use geo-content-optimizer; not for human-facing brand canon - use narrative-registry. 实体注册/知识图谱

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit an email program" or "is this campaign safe to send"; runs a typed 20-item SEND profile with authentication, consent, opt-out, and claim veto checks on own evidence. Not for building deliverability setup — use deliverability-qa; not for designing lifecycle flows — use email-sequence-designer. 邮件质量审计/EQS评分/发送前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or rewrite high-intent marketing copy grounded in product context, customer language, claims evidence, offer structure and conversion goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write B2B cold outreach and follow-up sequences grounded in relevance, evidence, concise value, compliant sending practices and clear calls to action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "write SEO content", "draft a blog post / landing page", "update outdated content", or "fix traffic/ranking decay"; two modes — new drafts pages with keywords, headers, snippets, and evidence boundaries; refresh scores decay, prioritizes update work, and produces a republish plan with GEO guidance. Not for AI-citation/GEO readiness scoring — use geo-content-optimizer; not for publish-gate scoring — use content-quality-auditor. SEO文章写作/内容更新/排名恢复

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize for AI search, answer engines, GEO/AEO/LLMO and conventional search together. Use for citability, AI crawler access, entity/brand evidence, llms.txt evaluation, platform readiness and AI-answer visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and draft or explicitly apply paid-ad optimizations using evidence, financial constraints, experiments, and capability-gated adapters. Use for campaign optimization, budget reallocation, bid changes, pausing or archiving ads, requests to delete campaigns, search-term or negative-keyword actions, creative rotation, or improving CPA and ROAS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create source-grounded paid-ad campaign concepts, messaging, copy, creative briefs, and production plans from a validated brand profile, campaign objective, platform requirements, and optional audit evidence. Triggers on: campaign brief, campaign concepts, create a campaign, ad concepts, ad copy, ad messaging, creative brief, headlines, descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

検査器（linter / ガード / CI ゲート / バリデータ / フィルタ）そのものの検出力が差分で静かに落ちていないか、また新設した検査が実際に検出できることが実証されているかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 unverified detection reduction（検査器の検出ロジック（正規表現・除外パターン・解決集合・allowlist・baseline）を変更して検出件数が減ったのに、減った 1 件ずつが誤検出であった根拠が示されないまま「誤検出を潰した」「N → M 件に減少」と改善として主張している）、Check 2 unproven guard detection power（新しい検査ロジック・CI ゲート・バリデーションを追加・変更したのに、検出すべき入力を注入して検出されること／検出すべきでない入力で黙ることを示す変異注入の証跡が無く、「追加した」「CI が緑」を検出力の証拠として扱っている）、の 2 Check を対象とする report-only。テスト自身のアサーションが実質何も検証していない構造は test-assertion-effectiveness、レビュー基準・品質ゲートの明示的な弱体化（ルールの削除・閾値の引き下げ・suppression entry 追加・lint ルールの無効化）は review-criteria-integrity、リファクタ完了主張一般の検証は refactor-claim-audit、workflow の permissions と action pin は gha-workflow-security、設定ファイルの構文・型の妥当性は config-json へ委譲する

Plan draft video-ad variations from supplied performance evidence, preserving the distinction between observed data and creative hypotheses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a broad video brief into the smallest useful production workflow, choose live model schemas, and return an evidence-backed execution plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose active BIRD daemon incidents across config, runtime, environment, sockets, logs, source, and tooling. Use when BIRD fails to start or reload, crashes, loses sessions/routes, behaves differently after lint passes, or when birdcc and bird -p disagree. Collect read-only evidence first, protect routing secrets, and route isolated config edits to bird-agent or pure implementation research to bird-source-explorer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a user interface under real-world conditions across responsiveness, hostile content, interaction states, accessibility, network failure, interruption, and complete user journeys, reporting observable user harm with evidence rather than aesthetic opinion. Use whenever the user wants to stress-test a UI, verify responsive and edge-case behaviour, inspect loading/error/empty/recovery states, review a flow for friction, or find where an interface fails under reality. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving observable user harm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。