「report」の検索結果

Build a threat model for a target codebase. Three modes: "interview" walks an application owner through the four-question framework and produces a threat model from their answers; "bootstrap" derives a threat model from the code plus past vulnerabilities (CVEs, git history, pentest reports) when no owner is available; "bootstrap-then-interview" chains the two when both owner and codebase are present. All write THREAT_MODEL.md in a shared schema. Use when asked to "threat model", "build a threat model", "map the attack surface", or "what should we be worried about in this codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce Public Equity Investing comparable-company valuation in report or workbook mode. Use for peer selection, multiple analysis, valuation read-throughs, implied prices, comps dashboards, Excel or Sheets comps, refreshable peer tables, model updates, and comps workbook QA. Do not use for DCF-only, credit-security, or generic market commentary requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when translating a specific event, policy change, macro shock, or industry development into public-equity issuer, sector, earnings, valuation, positioning, and portfolio implications. Do not use for standalone macro strategy, rates, FX, credit, futures, or generic market commentary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing full pre-earnings preview reports with executive summary, expectation bar, guidance credibility, KPI dashboard, scenarios, and call questions. Do not use after results or for short summaries unless the user explicitly asks for a summary/short version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building public-equity-investing initiating coverage reports. Do not use for trade pitches, memos, earnings notes, models, or tearsheets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex plugin in engineer-friendly language. Use when the user says "evaluate this plugin", "audit this plugin", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", "help me benchmark this plugin", or asks for a plugin-wide report before comparing versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex skill in engineer-friendly terms. Use when the user says "evaluate this skill", "give me an analysis of the game dev skill", "audit this skill", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", or asks for a skill-specific report before benchmarking it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect a ChatGPT Apps MCP server codebase and generate chatgpt-app-submission.json with app info suggestions, tool hint justifications, test cases, and negative test cases, then report review-check findings and outputSchema warnings for submission review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research across Notion and synthesize into structured documentation; use when gathering info from multiple Notion sources to produce briefs, comparisons, or reports with citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full CRUD and analysis for Mixpanel dashboards. Use when the user asks to build, create, analyze, read, understand, explain, modify, update, enhance, or manage dashboards, or asks about dashboard layout, text cards, or report arrangement. Covers dashboard analysis (read + understand existing), creation (new builds), modification (update existing), and explanation (data-driven annotation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a validated Data Analytics report or dashboard artifact through Sites. Use automatically for durable artifacts in any positively identified Work Mode when the full Sites lifecycle is callable, or in ChatGPT Desktop outside Work Mode only after an explicit Sites request or acceptance of the optional post-handoff sharing offer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route Data Analytics plugin-level requests and broad analytics work to the right focused workflow. Use when Data Analytics is at-mentioned, or for analytics requests involving data, metrics, dashboards, reports, charts, notebooks, spreadsheets, KPIs, market sizing, or semantic layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, build, revise, or QA quantitative charts and figures. Use when an analytical answer needs visual judgment, whether for an inline answer, report, dashboard, notebook, or artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a Canva design against a brand kit and report where it diverges — off-palette colors, non-brand fonts, logo misuse, and off-tone copy. Read-only; makes no changes. Use when the user asks "is this on brand", "check this against our brand kit", "do a brand review", "does this match our brand guidelines", or "brand-check my design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route web data visualization work. Use when the user needs chart choice, visual critique, dashboards, maps or geospatial views, Gantt timelines, UML/software diagrams, scrollytelling, reports or exports, testing, accessibility, browser implementation, or concept-first visual design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and draft a competitive battle card from public evidence — every claim labeled and sourced. Use when a rep needs a field-action card, not a research report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a competitive landscape with cited snapshots, a comparison matrix, and so-what implications. Use when a product decision needs competitive grounding, not a market report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

生成 MySQL 查询报表。当用户需要查询 MySQL 数据库并以报表形式展示结果时使用此技能，包括：统计销售数据、分析用户行为、生成业务报表、查询业务指标等。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect Sentry issues, summarize production errors, and pull health data via the Sentry API (read-only). Use when user says "check Sentry", "what errors in production?", "summarize Sentry issues", "recent crashes", or "production error report". Requires SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN. Do NOT use for setting up Sentry SDK, configuring alerts, or non-Sentry error monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to debug or fix failing GitHub PR checks that run in GitHub Actions. Uses `gh` to inspect checks and logs, summarize failure context, draft a fix plan, and implement only after explicit approval. Treats external providers (for example Buildkite) as out of scope and reports only the details URL. Do NOT use for addressing PR review comments (use gh-address-comments) or general CI outside GitHub Actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。