「track」の検索結果

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for a whole-corpus, read-only audit of tracked stablecoin static metadata and domain sidecars, especially after catalog changes or when factual or internal-consistency drift needs review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh tracked pre-launch stablecoin milestones, dates, launch phases, featured content, and promotion evidence. Use for the recurring upcoming-assets review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and populate tracked stablecoin compliance sidecars for the U.S. GENIUS Act, EU MiCA, or both. Use when adding or auditing authorization, applicability, pathway, or disclosure evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end plan → implement → review pipeline that takes one triaged Gaia issue to a merged-ready PR, with Kill Criteria on the issue and zero follow-up debt. Use when someone says: "resolve this issue", "take #N end-to-end", "work the P0 queue", "fix and ship this issue", "run the resolver", "close out this issue properly", or /gaia-issue-resolver. Works any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven — while the issue itself lives on the headquarters tracker, gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. Assumes the issue is already triaged and carries a P0–P4 label; if it does not, run /gaia-triage first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Gaia curation pipeline orchestrator. Routes each phase to its dedicated skill and keeps you on track from first discovery to closed intake. Use when starting a fresh curation run or when you want a single skill to hold the sequence together without duplicating each phase's instructions. Trigger phrases: "/gaia-full-pipeline", "run the full pipeline", "start a curation from scratch", "take this skill through the full pipeline", "curate end-to-end", "pipeline run", "full curation flow". Fused from: gaia-curate + gaia-curate-chain + gaia-curate-dynamic + gaia-curate-trending + gaia-bot-curate + gaia-draft-curate + ev-pipeline + gaia-ingest + gaia-intake-close.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replaces the voice in a video or audio file with one from the Novoads voice catalog, over the REST API. Converts the SPEECH in the source to a voice you pick, keeps the original timing so lip-sync survives, and returns audio that gets muxed back over the untouched picture locally. Casts by MEASURING the source voice against auditioned candidates instead of reading labels, refuses a source with no speech before anything is charged, fences sound effects and music so they survive from the original track, and verifies the finished file by transcribing it. Use when an actor's voice sounds robotic, flat, thin or simply wrong, and for "change the voice", "voice swap", "swap the voice on this ad", "re-voice my ad", "the actor's voice sounds bad", "make him sound human", "different voice for this video", "speech to speech", "same video better voice". Not for narrating a silent clip (that is a voice-over), not translation, and it changes neither pronunciation nor accent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two related malware samples to surface what changed between variants using section-level hashing, import-set differences, and fuzzy similarity scoring. Activates for requests to diff two samples, compare malware variants, or measure similarity between two binaries for variant tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an MPE-aware Pulp synth — opt into MPE via PluginDescriptor, consume per-note pitch bend / pressure / timbre from MpeBuffer, and route voices through MpeVoiceAllocator without reinventing channel tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evaluation frameworks for LLM systems — harness design, graders, datasets, regression tracking, and human-in-the-loop eval. Use when you need systematic measurement of model or agent quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design consumer ordering experiences — discovery, cart, checkout, tracking, and reorder flows that convert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep long conversations coherent — summarization checkpoints, entity tracking, topic stacks, and graceful context handoffs. Use when dialogues run long or span sessions and the agent keeps losing the thread.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage LLM context windows deliberately — budgeting, prioritization, summarization, and retrieval instead of dumping everything in. Use when prompts grow long, costs rise, or the model loses track of key details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate AI agents rigorously — task benchmarks, success criteria, failure taxonomy, cost/latency tracking, and regression testing. Use when you need to know whether an agent actually works, not whether it demos well.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a customer referral program (who may accept the reward, how the introduction is made), designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for an early-stage startup where the founder is still doing the selling — running founder-led sales, setting up a design-partner program, judging whether you have product-market fit, deciding what not to do yet, deciding when to hire the first AE or first marketer, and moving upmarket to larger buyers. Also use it when your company has just acquired another (or is about to), to plan the marketing integration: what you may and may not do between signing and close, the first letter to the acquired customers, whether to keep, endorse, fold in or retire the acquired brand, merging the two marketing databases without mailing people who opted out, when to start cross-selling, and announcing a product sunset. Also use it to design a demand-generation campaign and the channel plan it runs on: one campaign with one job, the offer for buyers who are and are not in market, what each channel is for, the kill and scale rules set before launch, the follow-up sales agrees to, the yearly calendar of always-on programs and tentpole campaigns, and which channels to keep, test or stop. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: founder-led sales, founder-led GTM, design partners, design partner agreement, first customers, first 10 customers, do we have product-market fit, PMF, Sean Ellis test, very disappointed survey, pre-seed, seed stage, when to hire our first AE, first sales hire, first marketing hire, moving upmarket, going upmarket, enterprise readiness, first enterprise deal, what do enterprise buyers need before they sign, positioning, product launch, beta program, early access program, design partners, private preview, public preview, general availability, GA launch, when can we call it GA, can sales sell a beta feature, selling the roadmap, launch tier, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, ideal customer profile, ICP, what is our real ICP, who actually buys from us, refresh our ICP from closed-won deals, ICP refresh before planning, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget. Also triggers on public-sector marketing: sell to government, government marketing, public sector go-to-market, federal marketing, state and local government, SLED, FedRAMP, FedRAMP marketing claims, can we say FedRAMP ready, GovRAMP, StateRAMP, VPAT, accessibility confor

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep paperclip-docs in lockstep with the parent paperclipai/paperclip codebase. Detects code-surface changes (CLI, env vars, API routes, adapters, plugin SDK, schemas) and produces friendly-tutorial-voice doc updates. Two modes — `nightly` (tracks parent's default branch (currently `master`), targets the `nightly` branch, preview deploy) and `release` (on parent tag, merges nightly → main, tags, ships live). Trigger phrases: "sync docs", "update docs from paperclip", "/sync-docs", "check for paperclip changes", "is docs current".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track, categorize, and prioritize technical debt across the codebase. Scans for debt indicators, maintains a debt register, and recommends repayment scheduling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emergency fix workflow that bypasses normal sprint processes with a full audit trail. Creates hotfix branch, tracks approvals, and ensures the fix is backported correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentry Unity SDK integration patterns for error tracking, performance monitoring, transactions, spans, and custom instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persistent Codex-style goal tracking for pi. Use when the user explicitly asks to set, continue, audit, pause, resume, complete, or inspect a long-running goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track/tenured Education Professor in a teacher-preparation program — designing a licensure course unit against InTASC/CAEP standards, deciding whether a candidate's borderline edTPA score needs a targeted or full retake, triaging a failing student-teaching placement, or assembling CAEP self-study evidence for reaccreditation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dragline and Excavating/Loading Machine Operator in surface mining — converting a rated bucket capacity into bank cubic yards moved per shift, deciding whether a swing angle or spoil-placement plan needs to be flagged to pit engineering, matching loading pass count and payload to a haul truck's rated capacity, checking ground bearing conditions before walking or tracking a machine onto fill or spoil, or reading a berm/highwall condition against MSHA thresholds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。