2,505 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Prompt and workflow for generating conventional commit messages using a structured XML format. Guides users to create standardized, descriptive commit messages in line with the Conventional Commits specification, including instructions, examples, and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing strategies and ansible-lint configuration for validating Ansible automation quality, covering lint rules, syntax validation, and integration test setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trust scoring, agent discovery, profiling, wallet/identity lookup, contact, dispatch, and metadata reads/writes via 8K4 Protocol (ERC-8004). Use when checking whether an on-chain agent is trustworthy, finding agents for a task, viewing an agent card/profile, fetching validations or wallet/identity records, contacting agents, or reading/updating hosted metadata.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, structure, or improve form interfaces for clarity, completion rates, and user confidence. Use when the user asks to build a form, redesign a form flow, improve form conversion, add multi-step forms, fix form UX, or structure field layouts and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold course exercise directories with numbered sections, exercise variants, required readmes, and repo-specific validation. Use when creating exercise stubs, adding a course section, or safely renaming exercises.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-test a plan against existing domain language, code behavior, and durable decisions. Use when the user wants DDD/domain-model grilling, glossary refinement, terminology challenges, context documentation, ADR candidates, or plan validation against a repo's language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in secure mobile coding practices specializing in input validation, WebView security, and mobile-specific security patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for mobile security implementations or mobile security code reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a configuration management expert specializing in validating, testing, and ensuring the correctness of application configurations. Create comprehensive validation schemas, implement configuration testing strategies, and ensure configurations are secure, consistent, and error-free across all environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
.NET testing fundamentals overview and navigation center. Triggered when users ask about "how to write .NET tests", ".NET testing getting started", "required testing tools", "testing best practices", "learn testing from scratch", and other general testing needs. Recommends appropriate sub-skills based on specific requirements, covering testing fundamentals, test data, assertions, mocking, special scenarios, and other 19 fundamental skills. Keywords: dotnet testing, .NET testing, testing getting started, how to write tests, testing best practices, unit test, unit test, xunit, 3A pattern, FIRST principle, assertion, assertion, mock, stub, NSubstitute, test data, AutoFixture, Bogus, validator, FluentValidation, TimeProvider, IFileSystem, code coverage, ITestOutputHelper, test naming
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates models and IOptions. DataAnnotations, IValidatableObject, IValidateOptions<T>.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code analysis patterns using Serena MCP for architecture validation and pattern detection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Using AwesomeAssertions for fluent and readable test assertion skill. Used when writing clear assertions, comparing objects, validating collections, handling complex comparisons. Covers Should(), BeEquivalentTo(), Contain(), ThrowAsync() and complete API. Keywords: assertions, awesome assertions, fluent assertions, assertion, fluent assertion, Should(), Be(), BeEquivalentTo, Contain, ThrowAsync, NotBeNull, object comparison, collection validation, exception assertion, AwesomeAssertions, FluentAssertions, fluent syntax
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skill manifest management for dotnet-harness. Tracks skill dependencies, conflicts, version compatibility, and provides validation and resolution tools. Triggers on: skill manifest, dependency resolution, skill compatibility, version conflicts, build manifest, validate dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests .NET MAUI apps. Appium device automation, XHarness, platform validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects API surface changes in CI. PublicApiAnalyzers, Verify snapshots, ApiCompat gating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building .NET 10 or C# 14 applications; when using minimal APIs, modular monolith patterns, or feature folders; when implementing HTTP resilience, Options pattern, Channels, or validation; when seeing outdated patterns like old extension method syntax
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skill manifest management for dotnet-agent-harness. Tracks skill dependencies, conflicts, version compatibility, and provides validation and resolution tools. Triggers on: skill manifest, dependency resolution, skill compatibility, version conflicts, build manifest, validate dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or update active planning documents under `planning/active`, then define the execution slices, validations, specialist handoff, and closeout expectations. Use when the task is non-trivial, multi-step, or explicitly asks for planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run MYOT project validation commands (lint and build) and report results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement MYOT changes safely with minimal diffs, behavior preservation, and post-change validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when wiring shadcn/ui primitives, forms or admin UI in site-os — the component mechanics, the VBField validation layer, and the UI bugs that have actually shipped here. For brand identity (colour, type, logo, voice) load brand instead; that skill wins on any disagreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retroactively audit and fill Nyquist validation gaps for a completed phase
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。