「esp」の検索結果

Fix Monte Carlo project completion simulations that give identical dates for all sub-groups (milestones, priorities, epics). Use when: (1) All sub-group predictions converge to the same date despite different remaining counts, (2) Proportional throughput scaling produces flat/identical results, (3) Applying overall scope rate to individual sub-groups causes simulations to hit max_weeks cap and never converge, (4) Building project forecasting tools that predict completion for sub-groups of a larger backlog. Covers hypergeometric draw model for milestones and cumulative priority model for sequential priorities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix NIP-46 nostrconnect:// URLs not being recognized by signer apps (Amber, nsec.app, nsecBunker). Use when: (1) QR code or URL paste fails in signer app despite valid-looking URL, (2) Using metadata JSON object instead of separate query params, (3) Implementing client-initiated NIP-46 connections. The NIP-46 spec requires name/url/image as separate query parameters, not a metadata JSON object.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug "API returns data that doesn't exist in database" when multiple Kubernetes clusters exist (production, staging, POC). Use when: (1) REST API returns records that direct database queries can't find, (2) Data counts match approximately but specific records don't overlap, (3) kubectl context points to a different cluster than the one serving the public domain, (4) ClickHouse/Postgres queries return stale or different data than the API, (5) "completely different datasets" despite same table names and schemas. Root cause: querying the wrong cluster's database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix incorrect priority ordering when using denormalized aggregate columns. Use when: (1) Records are processed in wrong order despite ORDER BY on count/sum columns, (2) Top items by some metric aren't being selected first, (3) Aggregate columns show 0 or NULL for records that should have high values, (4) Priority queue processes low-value items before high-value ones. The root cause is often that denormalized columns (vine_count, loop_count, total_orders, etc.) weren't backfilled or maintained properly. Solution: JOIN with source tables to compute actual aggregates at query time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up Cloud Run Jobs with CloudSQL connection. Use when: (1) Deploying long-running batch jobs that need database access, (2) Errors like "Cloud SQL Proxy not found" in container, (3) "password authentication failed" despite correct credentials, (4) Job creation fails with permission errors. Covers socket path configuration, IAM permissions, and common gotchas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix deployed Rust binaries not reflecting code changes when using docker buildx. Use when: (1) Code changes are verified locally (tests pass) but production behavior doesn't change after deploy, (2) Docker image has a new tag but contains old compiled binary, (3) Dockerfile uses multi-stage build with dependency pre-compilation layer and source copy layer. Docker buildx layer caching can serve stale compilation output even when source files change, especially with cross-compilation (--platform linux/amd64).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix password/secret authentication failures caused by trailing newlines when creating Google Cloud secrets (or similar) with bash here-strings. Use when: (1) Password authentication fails with correct password, (2) Secret created with `<<< "value"` syntax, (3) Error like "password authentication failed" or "invalid token" despite correct value. Bash here-strings (`<<<`) add a trailing newline that corrupts secrets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix silent failures in Fastly Compute@Edge when using send_async for fire-and-forget requests. Use when: (1) Background tasks (migrations, webhooks, notifications) triggered from Compute never complete, (2) send_async PendingRequest is immediately dropped, (3) Fire-and-forget pattern works locally but fails in production, (4) An async trigger "logs as triggered" but the target service never receives the request (especially after renaming backend constants — the URL hostname is cosmetic, the backend name determines routing, so a global rename can silently reroute calls to the wrong service). Also covers silent backend-not-found errors when FALLBACK_BACKENDS or other backend constants reference names not configured in the Fastly dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recover content from "dead" CDNs where DNS no longer resolves but servers still respond. Use when: (1) A service shut down but you have URLs to their CDN, (2) DNS lookups fail but you suspect the CDN provider (Fastly, CloudFront, Akamai) still has the content, (3) Archiving content from defunct services like Vine, Tumblr, etc. The key insight: CDN providers often keep serving content long after DNS dies - hit the IP directly with the original Host header.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug Fastly Compute services where code changes don't affect behavior due to multi-service routing architecture. Use when: (1) deployed changes have no effect, (2) unexpected redirects persist after code updates, (3) DNS resolves to Fastly but responses don't match deployed code, (4) `fastly service list` shows multiple related services. The root cause is often a routing/gateway service intercepting requests before they reach your content service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix wildcard subdomain routing for Fastly Compute@Edge services when subdomains resolve but return 500 "Domain Not Found" or empty responses. Use when: (1) TLS subscription "issued" but edge serves default certificate (CN=j.sni-644-default), (2) Fastly domain-v1 create succeeds but subdomain returns 500, (3) Static publisher/PublisherServer returns empty content for subdomain requests, (4) DNS wildcard CNAME resolves to wrong target. Covers TLS configuration SNI endpoint selection (x.sni vs j.sni vs w.sni), DNS trailing dot issues, Fastly domain-v1 activation, and reading from KV store directly when PublisherServer fails for subdomains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to display content in a responsive card layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress answers to the highest practical information density with minimal wording while preserving essential meaning. Use when the user asks for 言簡意賅, 講重點, Concise, 精簡回答, 簡潔回答, 只講重點, 直接回答, brief, TL;DR, or otherwise requests a concise key-points response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert image references into spatial hypotheses, camera constraints, construction routes, material evidence, and measurable Blender reconstruction gates. Use whenever a user asks to replicate, recreate, match, clone, or reconstruct a scene, environment, object, material, lighting setup, or shot from one or more images, especially when room connectivity, hidden space, perspective, visible-frame fidelity, material identity, aging, wetness, or photographic treatment matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define production-ready visual intent for Blender scenes and standalone assets, including focal hierarchy, depth layers, visual flow, scale and repetition rhythm, camera mobility, representation fidelity, and performance budgets. Use for original or reference-guided Blender work before construction choices are executed, especially environments, architecture, products, hero assets, or scenes whose modeling quality depends on coordinated spatial design rather than isolated objects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, calibrate, layer, and validate production Blender materials including bare and coated metal, brushed steel, rust, aged and wet wood planks, stone, concrete, plastic, glass, fabric, water, dirt, moss, and wetness. Use when material identity, UV direction, real-world texture scale, PBR channel handling, roughness response, anisotropy, normal/bump/displacement, transmission, volume absorption, aging, or surface layering determines realism.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate production-grade Blender work by probing the installed Blender version, retrieving relevant official Blender documentation, assigning visual design intent, classifying shape grammar and geometry/deformation/procedural/physics/shading needs, comparing direct Blender components with node systems, creating staged artifacts, and routing to specialist skills. Use for every non-trivial Blender creation, reconstruction, simulation, animation, environment, or scene-modification request, especially when the user does not know whether to use topology, Boolean, Array, curves, snapping, Displace, simulation, Geometry Nodes, or shading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze reference-image illumination and build accountable Blender lighting from shadow direction, shadow length, softness, exposed faces, environment fill, bounce, practical sources, and material response. Use for reference matching, daylight, interiors, exterior environments, product scenes, atmospheric lighting, or any task where lights must be physically and visually justified instead of added as arbitrary fill or rim lights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair C/C++ code violations detected by TLA+ model checking. Takes a program, TLA+ specification, and TLC counterexample trace as input, then generates minimal code modifications to eliminate the violation. Use when: (1) TLC model checker reports an invariant violation, deadlock, or temporal property failure, (2) You have a counterexample trace and need to fix the corresponding code, (3) You need to understand how a TLA+ violation maps to program-level bugs, (4) You want to validate repairs by re-running TLC. Supports safety properties (invariants), liveness properties (temporal logic), and deadlock detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively enhance user requirements into clear, complete, actionable specifications through analysis and clarification. Use when: (1) Users provide initial requirements that need refinement, (2) Requirements are vague, incomplete, or ambiguous, (3) Creating formal specifications from informal descriptions, (4) Identifying missing constraints, edge cases, or acceptance criteria, (5) Clarifying assumptions and implicit dependencies, or (6) Preparing requirements for design, implementation, or verification. Operates interactively: analyze → ask clarifying questions → refine based on responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Incrementally implement new features in Java repositories from natural language descriptions. Use when adding functionality to existing Java codebases (Maven or Gradle projects). Takes a feature description as input and outputs modified repository with implementation code, corresponding JUnit tests, and verification that all tests pass. Supports method additions, new class creation, and method modifications with proper Java conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify design quality issues in code including high coupling, low cohesion, God classes, long methods, and other code smells. Use when: (1) Reviewing code architecture and design quality, (2) Identifying refactoring opportunities, (3) Detecting God classes or classes with too many responsibilities, (4) Finding high coupling or low cohesion issues, (5) Analyzing code maintainability and technical debt. Detects coupling smells, cohesion problems, complexity issues, size violations, and encapsulation problems with actionable refactoring suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive API documentation from repository sources including OpenAPI specs, code comments, docstrings, and existing documentation. Use when documenting APIs, creating API reference guides, or summarizing API functionality from codebases. Extracts endpoint details, request/response schemas, authentication methods, and generates code examples. Triggers when users ask to document APIs, generate API docs, create API reference, or summarize API endpoints from a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and review APIs with suggestions for endpoints, parameters, return types, and best practices. Use when designing new APIs from requirements, reviewing existing API designs, generating API documentation, or getting implementation guidance. Supports REST APIs with focus on endpoint structure, request/response schemas, authentication, pagination, filtering, versioning, and OpenAPI specifications. Triggers when users ask to design, review, document, or improve APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。