「rest」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to generate API tests, create integration test suites, test REST endpoints, or build contract tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds production-ready REST API endpoints with validation, error handling, authentication, and documentation. Follows best practices for security and scalability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API security testing workflow for REST and GraphQL APIs covering authentication, authorization, rate limiting, input validation, and security best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API design principles and decision-making. REST vs GraphQL vs tRPC selection, response formats, versioning, pagination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers. Use when designing new APIs, reviewing API specifications, or establishing API design standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Azure Blob and ADLS storage accounts for public access exposure, weak or long-lived SAS tokens, missing encryption at rest, disabled HTTPS-only traffic, and outdated TLS versions using the azure-mgmt-storage Python SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADHD-friendly output shaping for subagent responses. Lead with the next action, number multi-step tasks, end with one concrete next step, suppress tangents, restate state across turns, give specific time estimates, make wins visible, matter-of-fact errors, cap visible lists to 5, no preamble or closers. Loaded by genin, jonin, anbu, tokubetsu-jonin, and chunin when shaping final responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Trello boards, lists, and cards via the Trello REST API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, edit, improve, or audit AgentSkills. Use when creating a new skill from scratch or when asked to improve, review, audit, tidy up, or clean up an existing skill or SKILL.md file. Also use when editing or restructuring a skill directory (moving files to references/ or scripts/, removing stale content, validating against the AgentSkills spec). Triggers on phrases like "create a skill", "author a skill", "tidy up a skill", "improve this skill", "review the skill", "clean up the skill", "audit the skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explicit-only request to restate the previous explanation plainly in the current conversation language while preserving facts and uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bootstrap a new or existing project with a small, file-based documentation system so Claude Code keeps context, lessons, and decisions across session restarts instead of starting cold every time. Sets up a handful of markdown files under .claude/ (standing rules, a free-form note to your next session, a phased roadmap, a prioritized backlog, and searchable history/changelog archives) sized and split so the files read every session stay small while the archives grow without ever costing context. Use this whenever someone is starting a new project and asks how to structure it for long-running AI-assisted work, wants Claude to "remember" things between sessions without relying on chat history, asks for a CLAUDE.md + backlog + changelog setup, mentions "session continuity", "persistent context", "project memory system", or is retrofitting an existing codebase that has no such system yet. Also use to explain or extend an already-bootstrapped bottle system (add a rule, start the archival script, add a new backlog section).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when capturing or restoring a learner's persistent profile to personalize teaching across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase or subsystem for architecture simplification - shallow or pass-through modules, scattered concepts, naming drift, sibling workflows that disagree, weak test seams. Use when the user asks what to simplify or restructure. Not for a narrow fix or for implementing an already chosen design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record the statements a journal requires and a reader checks — authors with their CRediT contributions, ethics approval that names the body and the reference number, how consent was taken, funding with grant numbers, conflicts of interest, data availability with an address or a reason, and the use of generative AI — as a validated record that the submission folder prints and the manuscript never carries. Use when a run is heading for submission, when an author asks who should be listed, when consent, approval or data sharing has to be stated, or when the venue's AI policy comes up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Link component, useNavigate, Navigate component, router.navigate, ToOptions/NavigateOptions/LinkOptions, from/to relative navigation, activeOptions/activeProps, preloading (intent/viewport/render), preloadDelay, navigation blocking (useBlocker, Block), createLink, linkOptions helper, scroll restoration, MatchRoute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh `memory/SPEC.md` and `memory/PLAN.md` in mature mode — restore canonical truth, archive retired plan history, delete stale derivative artifacts, and flag drift against code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a refactor as a sequence of tiny safe commits via interview and codebase exploration. Use when restructuring working code, or when the user says 'plan a refactor'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Obtenir et gérer un access token pour l'API Merci Facteur (envoi de courrier papier, recommandé, recommandé électronique). Utiliser dès qu'un appel à l'API Merci Facteur doit être authentifié, ou quand apparaît une erreur de signature, de timestamp, de restriction d'IP ou un token expiré. Couvre le calcul HMAC-SHA256 de la secret key, getToken, la durée de vie du token jusqu'à 365 jours (timeLimit, force) et le stockage des identifiants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Fault Management Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1002, Draft 2, April 2012). Use for the systems-engineering discipline of designing what a system does when it fails — the fault/failure/anomaly vocabulary, the five FM strategies (two prevention strategies — design-time fault avoidance and operational failure avoidance — plus three tolerance strategies — failure masking, failure recovery, and goal change), the six FM process activities across NASA mission phases Pre-A to E, response-latency-versus-time-to-criticality (TTC) design trades, fault/failure containment regions and FEPPs, the four redundancy approaches, top-down FM requirements development, FM verification vs. validation, the seven dedicated FM milestone reviews (FMCR/FMARR/FMPDR/FMCDR/FMTRR/FMLRR/FMCERR), FM organizational structure, and mined NASA Lessons Learned. Space-mission oriented (flight/ground/operations); spacecraft examples throughout. IMPORTANT: built from an UNAPPROVED DRAFT — several sections (detailed architecture building blocks, the Assessment & Analysis guidance, and Operations & Maintenance) are placeholders in the source and are thin here. Thin on detailed FDIR algorithms, terrestrial/IT fault management, and any approved-standard terminology that may have changed since Draft 2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。