「workflows」の検索結果

Music production expert for recording, mixing, mastering, and DAW workflows

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Video editing expert covering cutting techniques, pacing, color grading, and post-production workflows

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production deployment principles and decision-making. Safe deployment workflows, rollback strategies, and verification. Teaches thinking, not scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely manage multiple GitHub identities (EMU + personal) in agent workflows

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for setting up and configuring CodeQL code scanning via GitHub Actions workflows and the CodeQL CLI. This skill should be used when users need help with code scanning configuration, CodeQL workflow files, CodeQL CLI commands, SARIF output, security analysis setup, or troubleshooting CodeQL analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating publication-grade scientific figure images or prompts, including graphical abstracts, mechanism diagrams, anatomy diagrams, surgical step figures, experimental workflows, pathology mechanisms, device principles, and structured paper illustrations. If the user asks to generate the image, use ChatGPT image generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master the `agentbrain` CLI (npm package `agentbrain-cli`). Use this skill whenever the user runs, installs, configures, or asks about `agentbrain` commands; when they interact with the AgentBrain enterprise data hub — organizations, connectors, knowledge bases, workflows, media/documents, knowledge graph, permissions, LLM/prompt config, cost & usage, governance, audit logs; when uploading documents/files to AgentBrain (`agentbrain media upload`); when authenticating (login/logout/token/apiKey); when retrieving MCP context (`agentbrain retrieve-context`); when running SQL against a connector; when the user pastes any `agentbrain …` command; when they edit `~/.agentbrain/config.json`; or when they mention AgentBrain, agent-brain, agentbrain-cli, or the `.agentbrain` folder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-ticket batch workflow. Takes a batch of tickets, plans execution order, implements each via /implement in autonomous mode, runs cross-cutting quality passes, and presents results for final review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative development workflow that coordinates implementation, refactoring, QA, and documentation agents to complete features systematically. Use when the user wants a full development workflow with quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial project planning workflow. Explores the problem space, drafts tickets in batches, then runs sequential adversarial loops — a mandatory UX loop ("should we build this?"), zero or more discretionary specialist loops (security, performance) for projects with architectural implications in those domains, and a mandatory implementer loop ("could we build this?") — to find gaps before implementation. Creates well-specified, batch-tagged tickets upstream only after every applicable loop signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous technical lead. Takes commander's intent and drives a project to completion through an OODA loop over implementation, refactoring, review, and bug-hunting skills. Has broad authority — creates tickets, commits, invokes any skill — and only escalates via andon cord for irreversible actions, public releases, or genuinely blocking decisions. User acts as product owner; skill acts as tech lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mutation testing workflow. Systematically mutates source code to verify tests actually catch bugs. Multi-session with progress tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Problem redefinition before problem solving. Takes a stated problem, extracts its premises, then spawns reframers applying different lenses (problem-vs-symptom, scope-shift, stakeholder-shift, level-of-abstraction, time-horizon, inversion, category-shift, constraints-shift) in isolation, and synthesizes the alternatives into a report with an orchestrator recommendation. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Good-faith adversarial scrutiny of an idea or plan. Spawns critical skeptics across relevant lenses, pairs them with an advocate defending the idea, and synthesizes the exchange into a report. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility audit. Dispatches an accessibility auditor to identify WCAG conformance gaps, prioritize by user impact, and recommend fixes. Advisory only — no changes made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cuts a project release. Discovers the project's release procedure (Makefile target, RELEASING.md, CI workflow, etc.) and offers to capture it durably if missing. Always invokes /review-release as preflight, proposes a version bump from CHANGELOG, then presents an exact command plan for operator confirmation before executing step-by-step. Halts on first failure rather than attempting rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-release readiness review. Scans for debug artifacts, version mismatches, changelog gaps, git hygiene issues, breaking changes, and license compliance. Runs tests and build verification. Presents consolidated findings for human review before release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive test suite review across five phases. Surveys unit coverage, integration coverage, E2E (browser) coverage for webapps, fuzz coverage, and test quality — in that order. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement test changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-compaction housekeeping. Walks a checklist (persistent memory updates, git hygiene, trash cleanup) plus an open-judgment audit, produces an SBAR with a go/no-go recommendation, and emits a copy-pasteable resume prompt for the post-compaction agent if work remains. Run this immediately before /compact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box security audit. Blue-teamer and lead red-teamer run in parallel isolation for an independent first pass — neither sees the other's output during reconnaissance. A synthesis step categorizes findings into four prescriptive buckets (anchoring-suppressed, convergent, blue-flagged-unverified, divergent), producing a unified target list. Focused red-teamers then deep-dive each target. Iterates when exploit chains are discovered. Heavy and thorough by design. Advisory only — produces findings and proposes tickets; does not implement remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory workflow for understanding problem spaces and drafting feature proposals, refactorings, or complex bug-fixes. Creates detailed tickets in your issue tracker without doing implementation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。