「lua」の検索結果

Design and evaluate programmatic SEO strategies for creating SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and structured data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pricing, packaging, plan structure, or monetization tradeoffs need to be evaluated against positioning, conversion, and margin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate pricing changes using ARPU, conversion, churn risk, NRR, and payback. Use when deciding whether a pricing move should ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

See the difference between Chat and Cowork with a live side-by-side comparison for understanding why Cowork is built differently. Use when evaluating AI tools, for comparing chat versus agent capabilities, during an AI tool decision, when switching from ChatGPT or Claude Chat, or when the user says "what is different about cowork", "cowork vs chat", "why not just use chatgpt", "show me the difference", "compare chat and cowork", or "why should I use cowork instead of chat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt engineering and task-specification skill for improving prompts, agent instructions, system messages, evaluation prompts, coding-agent tasks, multi-step workflows, and LLM output reliability. Use when rewriting vague prompts, adding constraints, reducing ambiguity, improving safety, creating reusable prompt templates, or converting goals into actionable agent instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design effective reasoning processes for AI agents and optimize decision-making strategies. Use when designing agent prompts, improving decision quality, implementing specialized reasoning modes, creating reasoning traces, or debugging agent mistakes. Covers prompting, chain-of-thought, reasoning depth, and decision evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert prompt engineer specializing in designing, optimizing, and managing prompts for large language models. Masters prompt architecture, evaluation frameworks, and production prompt systems with focus on reliability, efficiency, and measurable outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve an existing skill or repository through isolated proposals, reproducible evaluation and evidence-based acceptance. Use for self-evolve or skill improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze historical VS Code GitHub Copilot Chat sessions by model, reasoning effort, AIU, time, reliability, workflow behavior, and external quality evidence, or safely prune workspace-scoped local chat history by age. Use for session analysis, repeated-task retrospectives, model evaluation, cost/performance analysis, and old session cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to brainstorm, evaluate whether an idea is worth building, run office hours, or think through a new product idea or design direction before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Agency Theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) to diagnose principal-agent problems — moral hazard, adverse selection — and design governance mechanisms to align interests. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze conflicts of interest between owners and managers, design incentive or monitoring structures, evaluate corporate governance effectiveness, or when they ask 'how do we ensure managers act in shareholders interest', 'why is this incentive plan failing', or 'what governance mechanisms reduce agency costs'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Knowledge-Based View (Grant, 1996) and Nonaka and Takeuchi's SECI model to analyze how organizations create, transfer, and integrate knowledge for competitive advantage. Use this skill when the user needs to design knowledge management systems, understand why knowledge transfer fails across teams, evaluate knowledge creation processes, or when they ask 'how do we capture tacit knowledge', 'why does knowledge stay siloed', or 'how can we turn individual expertise into organizational capability'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Upper Echelons Theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984) to analyze how top management team characteristics — demographics, experiences, values — shape strategic choices and organizational outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate TMT composition effects on strategy, predict strategic direction from leadership profiles, assess whether managerial discretion enables or constrains executive influence, or when they ask 'does leadership background matter for strategy', 'how does TMT composition affect decisions', or 'why did this management team make that choice'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Institutional Theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) to analyze how coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphic pressures shape organizational structures and practices. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why organizations in the same field look alike, evaluate whether a practice was adopted for legitimacy vs efficiency, analyze regulatory or social pressures on strategy, or when they ask 'why do all firms in this industry do the same thing', 'is this best practice or just conformity', or 'how do regulations shape our structure'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply rigorous survey design principles including construct operationalization, Likert scale development, reliability and validity assessment, and common method variance control. Use this skill when the user designs questionnaires, develops measurement items, needs to evaluate Cronbach's alpha or AVE, or when they ask 'how do I operationalize this construct', 'is my scale reliable', or 'how do I control for CMV'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply spiral of silence theory (Noelle-Neumann) to analyze how perceived opinion climate suppresses minority expression. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why certain viewpoints disappear from public discourse, evaluate the role of fear of isolation in opinion expression, or assess opinion climate dynamics — even if they say 'why are people afraid to speak up', 'silent majority', or 'social pressure on opinions'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Uppsala Internationalization Model to analyze gradual foreign market entry based on psychic distance and experiential learning. Use this skill when the user needs to plan a staged internationalization sequence, understand why firms enter culturally similar markets first, or evaluate whether a firm's international expansion follows the establishment chain from export to subsidiary.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Transaction Cost Economics (Williamson, 1975, 1985) to analyze governance structure choices — market, hybrid, or hierarchy — based on transaction characteristics. Use this skill when the user needs to decide make-or-buy, evaluate outsourcing vs vertical integration, design governance mechanisms for inter-firm relationships, or when they ask 'should we build this in-house or outsource', 'why do firms vertically integrate', or 'how should we structure this partnership'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Dynamic Capabilities framework (Teece et al., 1997) — sensing, seizing, and transforming — to analyze how firms adapt, integrate, and reconfigure competences in rapidly changing environments. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why some firms sustain advantage while others decline, evaluate organizational agility, distinguish operational from strategic capabilities, or when they ask 'how do we stay competitive as the market shifts', 'why did this firm fail to adapt', or 'what capabilities do we need to build'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。