「uat」の検索結果

Use when reviewing, critiquing, or stress-testing an existing strategy document. Evaluates seven dimensions — diagnosis quality, guiding policy strength, action coherence, assumption exposure, falsifiability — with optional 7S, Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri lenses. Triggers on: review my strategy, poke holes in this plan, what's weak here, strategy audit, red team this. Does NOT build strategy (use strategy-interview) or brainstorm project ideas (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate proposed repository harness changes with pinned Darwin tools and explicit evidence limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct substantial repository work across Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build with a concise brief, parallel agents, evidence-based completion, and optional cross-CLI continuation. Use for project onboarding, multi-step implementation, agent coordination, verification planning, low-interruption setup, or deciding how another CLI should take over. Do not use it as a permission gate or mandatory workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score candidate CVs on a 100-point scale against a Job Description. Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate, score, rank, or screen candidate CVs/resumes against a JD. Also trigger when the user mentions 'review CV', 'screen resume', 'rate candidates', 'shortlist', or any context involving matching resumes to job requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dirigent jednoho workflow kontraktu ve svém super.engineering worktree — deleguje implementaci na subagenta, mezi fázemi pouští wf-gate, review předá skill wf-review, otevře draft PR (guardovaný), vyřeší komentáře, spustí UAT. Použij, když task session říká, že se má kontrakt provést přes wf-impl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous novel writing CLI agent with web workbench (JiaOS Studio) - use for creative fiction writing, standalone short-fiction packages, cover generation, novel generation, style imitation, chapter continuation/import, EPUB export, AIGC detection, and fan fiction. Native English support with 10 built-in English genre profiles (LitRPG, Progression Fantasy, Isekai, Cultivation, System Apocalypse, Dungeon Core, Romantasy, Sci-Fi, Tower Climber, Cozy Fantasy). Also supports Chinese web novel genres (xuanhuan, xianxia, urban, horror, other). Multi-agent pipeline, two-phase writer (creative + settlement), stronger long-form chapter craft rules, hook-ledger payoff checks, 33-dimension auditing, token usage analytics, creative brief input, structured logging (JSON Lines), multi-model routing, custom OpenAI-compatible provider support, and JiaOS Studio web UI for visual book management, short-fiction runs, cover generation, chapter review, real-time writing progress, market radar, and analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

US Insurance Specialist for life, disability, long-term care, and annuity planning. Conducts needs analysis, compares policy types (term, whole life, universal, variable), explains underwriting classes, recommends benefit amounts and riders, analyzes disability income protection (own occupation vs any occupation), evaluates long-term care costs and hybrid policies, and structures annuities (immediate, deferred, fixed, variable) for retirement income. Use for insurance needs calculations, policy comparisons, or state insurance regulation compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for developed market life insurance using Embedded Value (EV) methodology. EV Multiple 0.6-1.0x, PVFP + ANAV calculation, and why P/E is unreliable for life insurers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for developed market growth general insurance stocks. Combined Ratio improvement trajectory, premium growth 7-10% YoY, expense ratio decline, and retention rate targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for emerging market insurance stocks. P/B 0.5-1.0x with 30-50% EM discount, combined ratio targets, and China vs India market comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insurance program review, coverage adequacy testing, contractor insurance verification, builder's risk/OCIP/CCIP evaluation, and property tax escrow management for AM, PM, and Development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

保险股估值分析工具。分析保险股PEV、PB、PE等估值指标，同业对比。使用AkShare行情数据、公司财报。适用于保险股投资决策。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for developed market value general insurance stocks. P/B 0.7-1.5x, Combined Ratio <100%, investment yield benchmarks, and dividend sustainability assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured initial contact summary memorandum from a potential client's first interaction with the firm. Captures case facts, liability indicators, damages, insurance details, and screening criteria. Use during client intake to support conflict checks, case evaluation, and engagement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive demo: Generate pseudo-labels from a strong teacher model, build a cheap student function, and evaluate accuracy. Showcases pseudo-labeling and teacher-student distillation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insurance policy analysis, claims evaluation, coverage assessment, and risk management for individuals and businesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIA) for high-risk AI systems as required by EU AI Act Article 27. Use when (1) deployers of high-risk AI systems (Annex III) need to assess fundamental rights impacts before first use, (2) public bodies or private entities providing public services are deploying AI systems, (3) credit scoring or insurance risk assessment AI systems are being deployed (Annex III 5b, 5c), (4) evaluating impact on natural persons' fundamental rights (dignity, liberty, privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, children's rights, etc.), or (5) creating EU AI Act Article 27 compliance documentation with market surveillance notification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates environmental liability exposure with remediation cost estimation, regulatory compliance requirements, and insurance coverage assessment. Use when analyzing environmental liabilities, estimating cleanup costs, or assessing environmental risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claim value trending and replacement cost tracking. Triggers: "claim value trending", "replacement cost tracking", "vehicle depreciation for claims", "residual value for insurance", "how fast is the insured vehicle losing value", "pre-loss value trajectory", "depreciation rate for settlement", "value retention for claims", "depreciation curve for total loss", "diminished value over time", "claim reserve adjustment", "portfolio depreciation exposure", "fleet depreciation risk", tracking vehicle depreciation for insurance claims valuation, replacement cost estimation, settlement trending, or reserve adequacy assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Database of insurance claim precedents and comparable settlements for evaluating claim values

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Use when: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery', 'assess claims fraud detection', 'optimize claims cycle time', 'review Guidewire ClaimCenter setup'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。