「evidence」の検索結果

Brand-narrative single source of truth (Busabase App-in-Skill) built on the TALE discipline — Trace / Architect / Land / Evaluate. The agent drafts positioning, the message house of value pillars, the story bank, evidence-backed proof points, and vocabulary/tone guardrails; the human curates which drafts become the CANONICAL narrative; a drift monitor flags off-brand usage across channels. Use when the user invokes $kelly-brand or /kelly-brand, mentions brand narrative, brand messaging, positioning, message house, value pillars, story bank, proof points, tone/vocabulary guardrails, narrative quality (NQS), brand drift, or wants a single source of truth for what the brand says.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve registered vertical composition inputs from source-grounded framing evidence, source A/V identity, layout anchors, and safe degradation. Use when a blueprint contains framing candidates or visual intents for a vertical delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Responds to security incidents in cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP) by performing identity-based containment, cloud-native log analysis, resource isolation, and forensic evidence acquisition adapted for ephemeral cloud infrastructure. Activates for requests involving cloud incident response, AWS security incident, Azure compromise, GCP breach, cloud forensics, or cloud identity compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse Windows LNK shortcut files to extract target paths, timestamps, volume information, and machine identifiers for forensic timeline reconstruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse and analyze Windows Amcache.hve registry hive to extract program execution evidence, file metadata, SHA-1 hashes, and device connection history for digital forensics and incident response investigations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Microsoft Outlook PST and OST files for email forensic evidence including message content, headers, attachments, deleted items, and metadata using libpff, pst-utils, and forensic email analysis tools for legal investigations and incident response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Examine Linux system artifacts including auth logs, cron jobs, shell history, and system configuration to uncover evidence of compromise or unauthorized activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Windows LNK shortcut files and Jump List artifacts to establish evidence of file access, program execution, and user activity using LECmd, JLECmd, and manual binary parsing of the Shell Link Binary format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse Windows Prefetch files to determine program execution history including run counts, timestamps, and referenced files for forensic investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using session replay. Watches two promises the replay product makes: that sessions are actually being recorded (capture integrity — recording volume vanishing while site traffic doesn't), and that the friction evidence inside recordings gets seen (rage-click / dead-click clusters concentrating on a page or element, error-after-interaction cohorts, recurring replay vision themes nobody aggregates). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bayesian parameter estimation with MCMC (emcee) and probabilistic programming (PyMC). Posterior distributions, corner plots, model evidence, convergence diagnostics. Use when you need full posterior distributions, not just point estimates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end post-GWAS causal inference pipeline orchestrating heritability partitioning, genetic correlation, Mendelian randomization with CHP-aware sensitivity (CAUSE / LHC-MR), colocalization, fine-mapping with SuSiE / FOCUS, mediation, TWAS triangulation, cis-pQTL drug-target MR, effector-gene prioritization (L2G / PoPS / cS2G), and GenomicSEM common-factor GWAS. Use when triangulating causal inference across multiple complementary methods, prioritizing tissues via stratified LDSC, nominating or de-risking drug targets, mapping a lead SNP to a candidate effector gene, modeling shared genetic architecture across correlated traits, or producing a STROBE-MR-compliant publication-grade evidence battery from GWAS summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify drug repurposing candidates via target-based, compound-based, and disease-based strategies. Combines drug-target-disease network reasoning with mechanism rationale, clinical-trial precedent, and patent/regulatory feasibility. Use for hypothesis-generating repurposing for orphan diseases, finding existing drugs for new indications, and prioritizing candidates by evidence and feasibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns untargeted LC-MS/MS features (m/z, RT, MS/MS) into confidence-stratified metabolite annotations using spectral-library matching (matchms), in-silico tools (SIRIUS/CSI:FingerID, MetFrag) and molecular networking, and assigns a defensible MSI/Schymanski confidence level to each. Use when naming detected features, scoring MS/MS against a reference library, running SIRIUS, or deciding what confidence level an evidence set actually supports. For upstream feature extraction see metabolomics/xcms-preprocessing and metabolomics/msdial-preprocessing; for downstream enrichment that must respect these levels see metabolomics/pathway-mapping; for lipid-specific structural annotation see metabolomics/lipidomics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic case investigation with evidence-graded findings, calibrated to the input. Use when the user asks to investigate a bug, trace what caused an incident, walk through unfamiliar code, or build a mental model of a code area before working on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft Stellar Community Fund Build Award applications interactively. Use when helping teams write their SCF submission — walks through project description, Stellar integration rationale, technical architecture, team section, deliverables, budget, and traction evidence. Produces a complete draft aligned with what funded projects look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help funded SCF teams write tranche submission reports. Use when a team has completed a tranche milestone and needs to document their deliverables for review to unlock the next payment. Covers deliverable documentation, completion evidence, demo preparation, and the specific format tranche reviewers expect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search academic literature and generate, validate, or compare Knows paper sidecars. Use for claim/evidence analysis and literature synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis, subgroup characterization, and reviewer-facing evidence control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have an existing component, flow, or interface and need an evidence-backed accessibility design review after basic checks pass. Best for WCAG 2.2 compliance, focus management, ARIA pattern quality, semantics, and state communication gaps automated tools miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to run real accessibility tests — Playwright keyboard interactions, axe-core scanning, visual regression, and WCAG 2.2 compliance checks. The measurement layer that feeds evidence into a11y-critic reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[32] ANALYZE. Ensure every critical claim has verifiable evidence with confidence levels. Each fact must have source + confidence percentage. If confidence <85%, enter Loop150 to find more sources. Use for critical decisions, factual claims, legal/compliance work, or any situation where unverified claims are dangerous.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。