5,064 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reverse-engineer how competitors do programmatic SEO. Detects URL pattern clusters (vs/, integrations/, for-{industry}/), estimates page count per pattern, analyzes template quality, infers which patterns actually drive traffic, and identifies gaps you can exploit. Outputs a competitive pSEO landscape report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a company's ideal customer profiles and build detailed synthetic buyer personas. Identifies 4-6 distinct buyer segments through web research, then creates rich, realistic personas with demographics, motivations, skepticism profiles, decision criteria, and language patterns. Use when you need to understand who your buyers are at a deep level — their motivations, objections, and how they evaluate solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI sales coach composite. Analyzes all available sales data — email campaigns, call recordings/transcripts, reply patterns, pipeline outcomes — to identify what the user does well, where they struggle, and how to improve. Finds patterns in top-performing emails, winning call techniques, successful objection handles, and deal progression. Produces personalized coaching recommendations based on their specific product, market, and selling style. Tool-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search Hacker News stories and comments using the free Algolia API. No Apify token needed. Use when you need to find HN discussions, track mentions, discover Show HN launches, or monitor tech community sentiment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end website audit through ICP eyes. Builds synthetic personas (if they don't already exist), runs a structured scorecard review of the client's site, then runs a head-to-head competitive comparison against top competitors. Produces a single consolidated report with persona feedback, competitive positioning, and prioritized recommendations. The complete "how do our buyers actually experience our site vs the competition?" workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft voice-tuned X (Twitter) post variants from a free-form brief. Reads a personal voice guide (generated via generate-voice-guide), produces 2–5 variants with distinct framings (simple-howto, problem-first, hype, mechanism-breakdown, etc.), and self-checks against the voice guide's banned phrases before returning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QC gate for a generated static ad image — verify the file opens, matches the requested dimensions, shows the correct product/subject (right shape, colour, label, logo), and has no garbled text or severe artifacts. Records pass/fail/needs-human in verification.md. Used as the final check in the static ad remix flow before shipping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble an iMessage notification-cascade video ad (≈14s, 9:16) from a plate of a phone lying face-up (setting chosen by the user) + 3–5 messages — authentic Apple Messages banners composited in PIL (SF Pro text, green Messages icon, warm translucent-greige fill, soft shadow) spring in one-by-one at the BOTTOM and push the stack UP, a right-aligned Show-less/X pill rides above, the X clears the stack, then a serif end card resolves. FREE assembly (PIL + ffmpeg); the recipe supplies the per-brand plate, notifications, and end-card config and gates the paid plate-clean/music calls to their own capabilities. Use for the imessage-notification-cascade format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a 'model comparison grid' video from a config — a fal-style "same prompt, N contenders" showcase — a dark real-DOM stage where per beat a monospace prompt fades in centered, docks to a small top strip, then a labeled 2-4 panel grid (static images OR muted video clips, mixable per cell) staggers in and holds for comparison, plus a minimal end card — frame-stepped via Playwright (video cells are frame-seeked deterministically) and encoded with FFmpeg. Deterministic assembly, FREE (cell media comes from create-image-fal / create-video-fal, music from create-music-elevenlabs), text stays pixel-crisp. Use for the model-comparison-grid format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Watch a brand's own product footage (screen recording, product film), pick the moment that proves each line with the user, and render those picks as a product layer — free, local. survey.py turns footage into timestamped contact sheets + scene cuts + motion so the agent can actually look at it; the agent writes a cut list (beat → source window + framing); preview.py draws it as a review sheet the user corrects round by round; cut.py renders the approved list into a silent 1080x1920 layer with the creator's area left as a plate. Also frames footage as a filmed screen (keystone, bezel, handheld drift) with dissolves between beats, and takes still screenshots as sources. Use for any format that shows real product footage beside, between or instead of a creator (split-screen, screen inserts, walkthroughs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer questions about a brand's Meta ads (spend, results, which ad is winning, is it paused, why did Goose do that) only from reads made in the same turn, with the data window and sync time on every number and a plain caveat when the connection is stale or partial. Use it whenever a user asks how their ads are doing or why an ad action was taken.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a language switch translates what the user sees, keeps what they had already typed, and is still in force after a reload. Use when i18n, a locale picker, a language menu or translation files were added or changed, when a string is suspected of staying in the old language or showing a raw translation key, or when a user reports losing their form or their language choice after switching or refreshing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove the next page of a list, or the next batch of an infinite scroll, loads NEW rows from the server, repeats none, and that the end of the list is handled. Use when pagination or infinite scroll was added or changed, when a list shows the same rows twice or skips some, or when the last page still offers a next control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare two or more companies, products, or platforms across pricing, features, positioning, and docs. Use this skill whenever the user says "compare X vs Y", "how does X stack up against Y", "alternatives to X", "competitive landscape of …", "X vs Y vs Z", or asks for a competitor matrix. Uses search to discover competitors when the user only names a category, then scrape for each competitor's homepage, pricing page, and features/docs. Returns a normalized comparison matrix as JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and normalize pricing tiers from any SaaS, API, cloud, or LLM vendor's pricing page. Use this skill whenever the user says "pricing for X", "how much does X cost", "pricing tiers", "cost comparison", provides a URL ending in `/pricing` or `/plans`, or asks to monitor pricing over time. Pairs well with `exportSkill` to turn a run into a cron-friendly workflow. Scrape-driven; no interact needed for typical pricing pages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the skill to control and verify the code interface configuration of your model — how Simulink® model elements are represented in the generated C or C++ code. This includes — (1) specifying names, types (storage classes), and placement of variables that represent model elements (for example, making a model parameter tunable as a global extern variable); (2) specifying names, types, and placement of functions that represent model algorithms; (3) selecting the deployment type (Component, Subcomponent, or Automatic); (4) selecting the interface configuration type (data or service interface); (5) linking a shared Embedded Coder dictionary to a model; (6) creating Embedded Coder dictionary entries and setting their properties; (7) for service interface configuration — specifying service interface definitions, including sender, receiver, client, and server services. Items 1 and 2 can be set per element or as a category-wide default. Item 1 applies to GRT and ERT models; the rest to ERT models only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks to summarize, or asks why Simulink Coverage objectives are missing, unsatisfied, or uncovered on a coverage result they already have — why specific decision, condition, MCDC, relational-boundary, or saturation/overflow outcomes weren't exercised, whether uncovered logic is dead code, or how to close the gap (a test, a coverage filter, or a design change). It reads an existing cvdata, .cvt file, sim-with-coverage output, or Simulink Test result; it never runs cvsim to collect coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find, show, open, or identify shipped MathWorks example models that demonstrate a concept, block, or application domain, and return the command to open them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand implementation details of .NET code by decompiling assemblies. Use when you want to see how a .NET API works internally, inspect NuGet package source, view framework implementation, or understand compiled .NET binaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build reactive/event-driven C# with R3 (Cysharp's modern reimplementation of Reactive Extensions). Covers the Observable<T>/Observer<T> model, the OnErrorResume error contract, async dispatch with AwaitOperation, Task/IAsyncEnumerable integration, TimeProvider/FrameProvider scheduling, the concurrency contract, and how R3 differs from System.Reactive (Rx.NET).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code files and reports statistics including line counts, file counts by extension, and total size. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand the composition of a codebase - asking about "how many lines of code", "what file types exist", "code distribution", or needing a quick audit of project size and structure. Make sure to invoke this skill when users mention analyzing codebases, counting lines, checking file distributions, or auditing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides how to preprocess plasma cfDNA sequencing data so the recoverable signal survives - library-prep-aware fragment expectations (dsDNA vs ssDNA/adaptase prep), UMI/duplex consensus with fgbio (ExtractUmisFromBam, GroupReadsByUmi --strategy paired for duplex, CallMolecularConsensusReads vs CallDuplexConsensusReads, FilterConsensusReads min-reads "total s1 s2"), the align->group->consensus->RE-align ordering, and the cfDNA dedup trap where naive coordinate dedup collapses nucleosome-coincident independent molecules. Covers when single-strand consensus suffices vs when duplex is mandatory, the singleton/sensitivity tax at low input, and reading the insert-size histogram as a pre-analytical QC instrument. Use when processing plasma cfDNA reads before fragmentomics, ctDNA mutation calling, or tumor-fraction estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Treats a ctDNA assay as a molecule-counting experiment at the Poisson edge and builds its analytical-validation case the measurement-science way. Covers the genome-equivalent currency (~330 haploid copies/ng), the lambda = input_GE x VAF sampling ceiling (lambda>=3 for ~95% detection), the error-suppression ladder (raw NGS ~1e-3 -> single-strand UMI ~1e-4/1e-5 -> duplex <1e-7), the CLSI EP17 LoB/LoD/LoD95/LoQ framework, the per-locus-vs-panel-integrated LoD distinction that lets bespoke MRD reach ppm, contrived/SEQC2 reference standards, and honest LoD reporting conditioned on input mass + consensus depth + replicate detection rate. Use when stating or trusting a sensitivity claim, designing a dilution-series validation, deciding how many genome equivalents are needed at a target VAF, choosing a single-locus vs panel-integrated LoD, or auditing a "detects 0.1% VAF" claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。