3,642 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design human-visible, machine-readable website layers for AI assistants, RAG, and agentic search. Use this skill when the user asks for llms.txt, LLM discovery plans, visible TLDR or direct-answer blocks, source trails, entity pages, markdown alternates, AI crawler policy, topic-to-URL maps, assistant-readable public content, or LLM-friendly architecture that must preserve canonical SEO strategy without hidden bot-only facts or duplicate story bodies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate SEO, LLM-readable site architecture, UX, content, monitoring, security, and external authority work as a task-plan-driven sequence. Use this skill when the user asks to plan, execute, validate, or route multi-skill website growth work; asks what to do next across semantic core, URL structure, internal linking, schema, llms.txt, UX journeys, analytics, citation monitoring, or white-hat link placement; or wants a central architect that preserves evidence, alarms, handoffs, and tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an engineering plan needs pressure-testing for architecture, complexity, data, risk, and operability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a design needs pressure-testing for UX, information architecture, states, and accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes Claude Project context budget under the automatic-RAG-by-window model: knowledge files vs. threshold-exempt overhead (Skills, MCPs, CI, Memory). Two modes: Quick Diagnostic and Full Budget Audit. Use when user says "check my context budget," "how much context am I using," "is my project too big," "optimize my token usage," "tier my files," "optimize for RAG," "improve retrieval quality," "should I keep compressing," "am I over-compressing," "should I accept RAG mode." Also trigger on context pressure symptoms: "Claude forgets my instructions," "responses getting generic," "content not found in my knowledge files." Also use when a project audit scores Knowledge Architecture ≤ 3. Do NOT use for content placement decisions (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), full project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), or behavioral tuning (use rootnode-behavioral-tuning if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design small interfering RNA and antisense oligonucleotide sequences against a transcript, and screen them for the failure modes specific to nucleic-acid drugs. Use this skill to tile a target transcript, apply positional and thermodynamic selection rules including duplex asymmetry and nearest-neighbour melting temperature, scan candidates for seed-region complementarity to off-target transcripts, and lay out a chemical modification pattern — gapmer architecture, 2'-O-methyl and 2'-MOE wings, locked nucleic acid, and phosphorothioate placement. Also trigger on siRNA, antisense oligonucleotide, ASO, gapmer, RNase H, seed region, duplex asymmetry, 2'-MOE, locked nucleic acid, phosphorothioate, or GalNAc conjugate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a plugin", "scaffold a plugin", "understand plugin structure", "organize plugin components", "set up plugin.json", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "add commands/agents/skills/hooks", "configure auto-discovery", or needs guidance on plugin directory layout, manifest configuration, component organization, file naming conventions, or Claude Code plugin architecture best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Backend conventions and patterns. Use when working on API routes, dependency injection, or hexagonal architecture in the backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI intuitive exploration for approaching unknown codebases, problems, or systems without preconceptions. Adapts the Coordinate Remote Viewing protocol to AI investigation: cooldown (clear assumptions), staged data gathering (raw signals → dimensional → analytical), AOL management (separating observations from premature labels), and structured review. Use when investigating an unfamiliar codebase with unknown architecture, debugging a problem where premature hypotheses could mislead, exploring a domain with limited context, or when previous attempts have been led astray by assumptions and "beginner's mind" would be more productive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and execute chaos engineering experiments using Litmus or Chaos Mesh. Test system resilience through controlled fault injection, validate hypothesis-driven tests, and improve failure recovery. Use before major product launches, after architecture changes to validate resilience, during GameDays or disaster recovery drills, to validate assumptions about failure modes, or as part of an SRE maturity program.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply software pipelining (double-buffering) to a tiled GPU kernel to overlap global memory loads with Tensor Core computation. Covers prologue/loop/epilogue restructuring, LDG-register vs cp.async (LDGSTS) variant selection based on compute/load ratio, shared memory budget verification against architecture-specific occupancy cliffs, and SASS-level verification of load/compute overlap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract the conceptual essence of a repository as skills, agents, and teams — the project's roles, procedures, and coordination patterns expressed as agentskills.io-standard definitions. Reads an arbitrary codebase and produces generalized definitions that capture WHAT the project does and WHO operates it, without replicating HOW it does it. Use when onboarding to a new codebase and wanting to understand its conceptual architecture, when bootstrapping an agentic system from an existing project, when studying a project's organizational DNA for cross-pollination, or when creating a skill/agent/team library inspired by a reference implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a generative diffusion model (DDPM or score-based) with noise scheduling, U-Net architecture, training loop, and sampling procedures including DDIM acceleration. Use when building a generative model for image, audio, or molecular synthesis; implementing DDPM from a research paper; adding a custom noise schedule or conditioning mechanism; replacing a GAN-based generator with a diffusion alternative; or prototyping before scaling with production frameworks like diffusers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design terminal output for a CLI tool with chalk colors, Unicode glyphs, multiple verbosity levels (human, verbose, quiet, JSON), and consistent voice rules. Covers color palette selection, status indicator design, reporter function architecture, ceremony/narrative output variants, and cross-terminal compatibility. Use when building a new CLI reporter module, adding warm narrative output to an existing tool, standardizing output across multiple commands, or designing machine-readable JSON alongside human-readable text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform controlled dismantling of rigid system structures while preserving essential capabilities (imaginal discs). Covers rigidity mapping, dissolution sequencing, knowledge extraction, interface archaeology, and safe decomposition of technical debt and organizational calcification. Use when assess-form classified the system as PREPARE or CRITICAL, when a system is so calcified that incremental change is impossible, when technical debt blocks all forward progress, or before adapt-architecture when the current form must be softened before it can be reshaped.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess an open-source agent framework for investment readiness by evaluating community health, supersession risk, architecture alignment, and governance sustainability. Produces a four-tier classification (INVEST / EVALUATE-FURTHER / CONTRIBUTE-CAUTIOUSLY / AVOID) to guide resource allocation decisions before committing engineering effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply collective intelligence coordination patterns — stigmergy, local rules, and quorum sensing — to organize distributed systems, teams, or workflows without centralized control. Covers signal design, agent autonomy boundaries, emergent behavior cultivation, and feedback loop tuning. Use when designing distributed systems without a coordination bottleneck, organizing teams that must self-coordinate, building event-driven architectures with shared state communication, or replacing fragile centralized orchestration with resilient emergent coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove dead code, unused imports, fix lint warnings, and normalize formatting across a codebase without changing business logic or architecture. Use when lint warnings have piled up during rapid development, unused imports and variables clutter files, dead code paths were never removed, formatting is inconsistent, or static analysis tools report fixable hygiene issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI multi-path reasoning coherence using bee democracy — independent evaluation of competing approaches, waggle dance as reasoning-out-loud, quorum sensing for confidence thresholds, and deadlock resolution. Use when forage-solutions has identified multiple valid approaches and a selection must be made, when oscillating between options without committing, when justifying an architecture or tool choice with structured reasoning, or before an irreversible action where the cost of the wrong choice is high.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a tensegrity system by identifying compression struts and tension cables, classifying type (class 1/2, biological/architectural), computing prestress equilibrium, verifying stability via Maxwell's rigidity criterion, and mapping biological tensegrity (microtubules, actin, intermediate filaments). Use when evaluating tensegrity in architecture, robotics, cell biology, or any system with isolated compression in continuous tension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。